IslandGuru Who payed the critics

Incannerax What a waste of my time!!!

Reptileenbu Did you people see the same film I saw?

CommentsXp Best movie ever!

juanmanueltapiaa 101 Dalmatians: now the magic is real was pathetic, boring and no one should see, and that an actress of the caliber of Glenn Close has made the ridiculous is insulting and inexcusable, and while 102 Dalmatians was just ridiculous, at least this was entertaining and the story is more original than the previous one, is forced that want to look sequel to 101 Dalmatians, in fact dog Rabito and Chloe you remember but this film saves the fact that funny and that Glenn Close, just as ridiculous to remove smiles and suspense in this movie because if it acts as a villain, is manipulative, treacherous, obsessive, impulsive and perhaps a little degenerate.Finally, 102 Dalmatians is better than its predecessor because it's ridiculous, but fun, is very, funny, we have Glenn Close doing weird things, but takes the lead in making a good villain, fledged, as seen in animation.hey! Gerard Depardieu fascinated me as a child being lePelt before I knew who did Obelix XD

Sam Ellerton this film is completely underrated! it's so much fun and should be thought of as completely light-hearted, the acting from the main dog owners; Chloe and Kevin, were good for the role they were given, this film is perfect for dog lovers! each one of the Dalmatian puppies were as cute as the next, also which i was pleasantly surprised about was the unique plot compared to the first, i felt the first was just trying to be a solid copy of the animated classic, and flopped dramatically. but this one has so much more charm and charisma than the first film and is completely underrated for the type of film it is trying to be, whether you like these types of films or not, take it or leave it. but believe me, you're missing out.

leplatypus Maybe because it was the only name at that time, I was fed up with Disney during my childhood and it has stuck me as the best name for light, poetic and educative entertainment. Unfortunately, after each new feature I see now, I'm profoundly unhappy because the name is in fact a mirage and has lost indeed all its magic.Those dalmatians verify this rule: Making a live movie of those pets and reuniting big names in ridiculous parts as well as nice newcomers ("mr. Fantastic", ms Evans) was seductive. But, the recipe doesn't make it. The story is as indigestible as the final cake and the scenes drags loudly. All the energy of the cast is wasted on useless moments as nothing really essential happens. In addition, all these poor action is made intolerable with the never-ending sarcasm of a Jago clone (see the parrot of "Aladin"). The dogs are really leftover and don't do much. Surprisingly, the movie looks cheap for a Disney as the sets looks really like a set. So, now, you know: beware the dogs and beware the brand !

nutolm I will recommend all conscious adults to stay away from this movie, but of course, that could be a problem if you take your kids to see it. But please, keep the very youngest away, the end could be a bit too rough for their eyes and minds.Well, this movie has the same recipe as the "original" from 1996, almost everything follows the same track. It's pretty much the details in the story that more or less could come up with a few more surprises. Therefore it is predictable to the point of painful boredom, I knew everything that was about to happen in the next frames, that's not a good feeling when I am watching a movie.These extreme characters Cruella, Jean Pierre and butler Alonzo are overplaying, it's far over the top. They seemed to get as close to the original characters as possible from the animated movie from 1961, but didn't succeed. Even with yet more dog added, it didn't help, but anyway - it was the dogs who made some colourful entertainment in this disaster of a movie. It was quiet annoying to watch..