28 Weeks Later

2007 "When days turn to weeks... the horror returns."
6.9| 1h40m| R| en
Details

The inhabitants of the British Isles have lost their battle against the onslaught of disease, as the deadly rage virus has killed every citizen there. Six months later, a group of Americans dare to set foot on the isles, convinced the danger has come and gone. But it soon becomes all too clear that the scourge continues to live, waiting to pounce on its next victims.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 7-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

SunnyHello Nice effects though.
Baseshment I like movies that are aware of what they are selling... without [any] greater aspirations than to make people laugh and that's it.
Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.
Cheryl A clunky actioner with a handful of cool moments.
caaroraakash After watching 28 days later .I think i should watch this . the first 20 minutes of the movie is great but after that there are many scenes which i found illogical and stupid . there is a genetically immune women who is suppose to be a vaccine and cure for the infected but brutally killed by his Stupid and Coward husband . There is several scenes in that movie which resembles itself with the original 28 days later about humans and human emotions but all the emotions are float away with that stupid code red fire explosion . The explosion is so Stupid not because of the bad script but also because of Stupid CGI.
robborulez Unfortunately for me the film having come off the back of 28 Days Later left me wanting more from it. While the few twists in the storyline were good they were able to be seen from a mile away. Robert Carlyle did a brilliant job as the lead actor in this but to see both Rose Byrne and Idris Alba trying to portray an America was the stuff of nightmares. Jeremy Renner's character did a good job of keeping the plot moving along I just felt the film really lacked much of what came from 28 Days Later. The opening scene itself was magnificent and kept me on my toes especially what seemed like I guess we'd now have as a drone following Robert Carlyle's character.
lialovesjonas As far as Horror movies go I usually stay away from sequels etc as they rarely live up to their expectations and this was no exception. I did expect gore and being completely honest I was hoping for a bit of story line that didn't fall into the cliché category, but I was wrong on the second one. If you liked the first movie then I do not see the point in spoiling your love by watching this movie. If you liked the first one, but still want to give it a chance due to the actors in the cast then go ahead, but be prepared to face some very bad acting. My score was given solely on everything summed up together.
afrodome 28 Weeks Later is certainly not a bad movie by any means. This is why people's subjective points of view are unneeded. If you want a horror movie with lots of blood and violence, quick editing, choppy cuts, followed by more violence, etc. this one supersedes 28 Days Later by a mile.For me (note: me; what I experienced, not the foreshadowing of your experience) there was a mean spirited vibe throughout the entire film. I felt like I was just watching bodies pile followed by close-ups of brutality with In A Heartbeat (the score from the previous film) being played GOD KNOWS how many times. My biggest gripe was with the thumb-in-eye thing: what the hell? Boyle did this in the first one to show human behavior in a state of rage and survival and how it mirrored the behaviors of the infected. They throw in Don newly infected doing it to his wife while she was strapped to a bed; seriously? From then on the movie leaves horror territory and starts becoming a sadist's playground.