Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

ChicDragon It's a mild crowd pleaser for people who are exhausted by blockbusters.

ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

Mehdi Hoffman There's a more than satisfactory amount of boom-boom in the movie's trim running time.

eeyorestail3 "A Life In The Theater" is an insightful and thoughtful look inside the life of two actors in repertory theater. If you are looking for action, you might as well stop reading and go watch Star Wars again. If you are looking for a film that makes you think long after the movie is over, you have come to the right place. Lemmon is near the top of his game. I say "near to top" only because of his incredible performance in "Glengarry Glen Ross." Veteran actor John (Lemmon) and young actor Robert (Broderick) are stuck together by chance, sharing a dressing room and the stage throughout a long series of plays. They even frequent the same diner. John, a lonely old man who clearly understands that his days are numbered, seizes upon this opportunity to impart his years of experience in the theater to young Robert. Robert's initial pleasure at his companion's attention quickly turns to hauty anger, which in turn dissolves into frustrated bewilderment and concern. For a brief moment he glimpses, through John's actions, where his own path might lead, and it is a sad place indeed. It is not something on which Robert dwells, but his attitude towards John is somewhat tempered by the experience. Practicing his lines in the empty stage of the empty theater, he half-suspects that John is watching from the darkness at the back of the theater--and he is, watching proudly and reciting the lines quietly in concert with his young protégé. It should have ended there. John's interrupted soliloquy to an equally empty theater is anti-climatic. My only other criticism is that Broderick's performance is too understated--he needed a bit more passion. Still, an excellent film.

cobrompton I would classify this movie as a 1 because I cant imagine anyone who would have even a slight spark of interest in the plot of this film. I was unfortunate enough to have my time wasted by this film because it was given to me as an extra bonus for buying movies from a rental that had closed down. If a movie doesn't offer anything substantial in a way of enlightenment, a differing world view, good cinematography, or something along the lines of a good reason to watch it, it should at least have a plot. Terribly unimaginative and incredibly boring are the only way to describe this movie with Mathew Broderick; an actor who I must say has only one usable character in his repertoire, Ferris Bueller-silly, and Ferris Bueller-not silly.

moviejunkie1 If you have ever been involved in community or local theater groups, you may enjoy this film. After spending several years with the same actors, play after play, I found this film to hit the bullseye. Mamet's writing is brilliant as the relationship between the veteran actor and the budding actor develops - not only off-stage, but is intensified by the repertory plays in which the two actors are cast. Mamet never fails to entertain, nor does he ever fail to unmask the human dilemma. This movie is considered a 'comedy,' however, if you have ever acted or been involved with production 'behind the scenes,' you may just say to yourself, "this is not funny - I 'know' these people!" This film delivers its goods to those who understand them. And as always, Jack Lemmon and Matthew Broderick are a pleasure to watch perform their craft.

Dan Zelman Unless you are trying to watch all of Jack Lemmon's or Matthew Broderick's films stay away from this. 78 minutes of conversation between the 2 actors. I thought it was awful. Nothing interesting happened and the conversation never developed. The viewer never learns much more about the characters and after awhile doesn't care.