A Little Romance

1979 "America is having a love affair with "A Little Romance""
7.4| 1h48m| PG| en
Details

Intellectually precocious teenager Lauren King lives in Paris with her somewhat ditzy mother. On a movie set, she strikes up a friendship with teenage film buff Daniel Michon. After Lauren's mother forbids her to date the outspoken Daniel, the young lovebirds team up with eccentric pickpocket Julius to run away to Venice, where, according to legend, a couple who kiss under the Bridge of Sighs will stay together forever.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Also starring Thelonious Bernard

Reviews

Redwarmin This movie is the proof that the world is becoming a sick and dumb place
RyothChatty ridiculous rating
Doomtomylo a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.
mraculeated The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.
evanston_dad A simply delightful little film about two young kids who fall in love and the adult accomplice (Laurence Olivier) who helps them with their plan to get away from the other overbearing adults in their lives and seal their love with a kiss under a certain bridge in Venice.I think what really makes "A Little Romance" something special is the strain of melancholy running through it. These particular young 'uns are in the full flush of love, but they're surrounded by examples of people who have had it and lost it or never had it to begin with. It gives a sense of urgency to their mission and makes it feel more important than a mere whim.The performances are uniformly excellent, though Sally Kellerman could have been directed to dial it back a little bit as the nightmare of a mother she's asked to play. The film is also overall a little long - - a good 15 minutes shaved off its running time wouldn't have been amiss. But otherwise this is a charming film.Winner of the Oscar for Best Original Score in 1979 and a nominee for Best Adapted Screenplay.Grade: A
SnoopyStyle Daniel Michon is a young Parisian obsessed with American movies. He sneaks onto a film set and meets smart American girl Lauren King (Diane Lane). Her mother Kay (Sally Kellerman) is a three-times married actress flirting with her director. Daniel and Lauren start hanging out. They encounter Julius Santorin (Laurence Olivier) in the park who tells them about a romantic tradition under the Bridge of Sighs in Venice. Lauren invites Daniel to her birthday party but Kay is instead holding a wrap party for the film. Her stepfather announces that they're moving to Houston. The young couple hatches a plan to go to Venice with Julius' help. Kay launches an international search for her missing daughter.This is young puppy love. They're more like friends. Diane Lane is incredibly young in her film debut. She's quite charismatic. On the other hand, the boy is only fine. He's a young kid and his character needs an endearing scene. Then there is Sir Laurence Olivier. He adds some serious comedic flair to the proceedings. Without him, the movie is sweet and quirky without substance or laughs. This is an odd movie. It's not that funny but some of it is. The romance is light and innocent. The trio's chemistry is good. The adventure is light but it has the weight of the exotic European locations. Mostly, it's interesting to see Diane Lane as a very young actress. It's always fun to see a famous person as a young performer.
wapotter I was embarrassed for Sir Laurence Olivier who must have been in dire need of money to allow himself to be involved in this picture. The only two actors that actually seemed to know what they were doing in this film were Mr. Olivier who played Julius and Arthur Hill who played the father. Sally Kellerman was way over the top as the neurotic, hypocritical and overbearing mother (reminding of Hot Lips Houlihan in "M*A*S*H"). It appeared to me that the director was only interested in placing the children in adult situations and seeing how filthy he could get their language to be. The film might have been better if it had been completely subtitled or in English (with poor or unintelligible French and Italian accents). The only reason to actually view this film is because of Olivier. His character was believable. The story line was predictable and contrived. The direction looked like it may have been done by a film student who was unsure of how to direct...which is surprising, since George Roy Hill directed such watchable and enjoyable films as "The Sting," (which had a prominent placement in the film) "Thouroughly Modern Millie," and "The World According to Garp." If you have 2 hours to spend, it might be better to find something else to watch...maybe "Bridge to Terebithia," or "My Girl."
paradox252003 Something about this movie was extraordinary and beautiful. Its genuinely pure and genuinely innocent. If you can handle that kind of stuff you will love this movie. I first saw it in 1989 and it is still one of my all time favorites. The quality of the dialog was well scripted and the story was very watchable, simple pure and something in this movie brought me back to my adolescence and I could relate to not only the memory of those experiences, but the feelings of those memories, and this movie really understood the sensitivity and struggle of those times in the lives of young teenagers. Diane Lane was so special and beautiful, she really helped this movie to be something special.