Grimerlana Plenty to Like, Plenty to Dislike

BroadcastChic Excellent, a Must See

ChicRawIdol A brilliant film that helped define a genre

Yash Wade Close shines in drama with strong language, adult themes.

tawandalou Alex Jones is included in several places talking about conspiracies. Unfortunately, he eliminates all credibility from anything he's involved in.

packoftwenty So Jane Graham appears in this film, but they don't ask her about the two perpetrators of the bombing, who she saw in the building twice, on the two days before the bombing, and then saw, by accident, on television, walking in front of the cameras, right in front of the Murrah Building? Jane Graham gave video testimony to this effect, in great detail, in the video 'Coverup in Oklahoma', where she holds a photograph of a screen grab of that video of two of the perpetrators. She talks for almost one hour, in two interviews, about those two perpetrators. Their photo is very clearly shown both at 47:10 and at the very end of 'Coverup in Oklahoma' - so why does A Noble Lie not mention these two murderers? Why didn't Alex Jones ask Jane Graham about these two perpetrators when he interviewed her? Therefore, you can take 'A Noble Lie' as a REAL 'noble lie', it is disinformation, designed to allow the perpetrators to go free, because we have VIDEO evidence of who they are, yet these two men have never been arrested or charged.

Ryan Taylor I was very impressed with the way A Noble Lie tells the story of the OKC bombing. The film makers don't use cheesy sound fx, savvy editing or the like to add fluff here. Any documentary that does usually means the content is not strong enough to rest on its own. That is not the case with this one.A Noble Lie uses physical evidence, eye witness testimony, media reports, and court documents to allow the viewer to come to their own conclusion. All in all it was very informative, and did not pile on too much at the same time. I would like to see some things discussed more in detail, like Tim McVeigh's interviews in prison, and I'm hearing a sequel is in the works, so hopefully that happens. Any person with a critical eye that likes to think for themselves, I recommend checking this one out.

ereetos The film was a bit slow to start off. The intro was well done and grabbed my attention for the first few minutes but it jumped into what seemed like a whole lot of "here-say" from eyewitnesses. i was beginning to lose interest (having been spoiled by the overwhelming hard hitting quick facts from documentaries like "Loose Change"). The movie took a turn for the better when they started getting into the facts of the bombing, the inconsistencies, etc. Once the movie hit this stride, it became more and more interesting while infuriating at the same time. watching it i felt like i was duped by the "official" story. Overall it was a great film that didn't force an opinion on you but laid out all the evidence for you to analyze. Other films and books i'd have to recommend if you're interested in these types of cover ups would be the following:Loose Change 2nd edition Kill Zone: A Sniper Looks at Dealey Plaza by Craig RobertsThe truth is stranger than fiction my friends, don't believe everything you're told to believe.