Marketic It's no definitive masterpiece but it's damn close.

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Kayden This is a dark and sometimes deeply uncomfortable drama

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

AlexanderAnubis CONTAINS SPOILERS No long vistas of sloping decks under starlit skies or of a sinking ship with rows of frightened people lining the rails. The film opens with a close up of a derelict WWII mine sloshing about in the sea while the sound of a large liner's engines gets louder and louder. A very brief swirl of explosion, fire and smoke set to a score of people screaming as a voice intones "Abandon Ship!" This is followed by a short sequence of some effective images - particularly a baby doll floating face up - with a narrator telling us the rest of the background we need to know for this unusual, unsettling drama about survival to begin.The story is simply this: a lifeboat is too overcrowded to survive a coming storm and the senior officer must decide unilaterally who to jettison overboard so the rest can have a chance to live. A simple problem with a simple solution - sort of.Based on events following the loss of the William Brown which departed Liverpool, England on March 13, 1841 for Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, with 65 passengers and 17 crew, and sank about 250 miles off Newfoundland after colliding with an iceberg on the night of April 19. (The Titanic sank about 300 miles off Newfoundland after colliding with an iceberg on the night of April 15 - 71 years later.) The film upgrades the ship to a large luxury liner in the mid-20th century and places it in the Pacific or South Atlantic Ocean as opposed to an emigrant vessel in the North Atlantic in the mid-19th century. It also takes many dramatic liberties with details and invents some over-dramatized subplots yet retains the larger events and moral dilemma essentially intact. The time line of the real events is naturally compressed in the film for clarity, but very well paced.In the actual sinking, two crew members made the decisions about who to sacrifice: the First Mate, Francis Rhodes and a crewman named Alexander William Holmes. Again for clarity, the film sensibly distills these into one character called Alexander Holmes (Tyrone Power) and makes him the senior officer. It also creates a plausible, (but not perfect), scenario for how one person in a crowded lifeboat could alone compel others to throw some overboard. Not that easy a plot device to construct without arming him with a machine gun - the script only allows its 'Alexander Holmes' a pistol which is initially unloaded and a flare gun.The real Holmes, Rhodes and other survivors eventually reached Philadelphia; Rhodes fled and was never found. Holmes was tried between April 13-23, 1842 in Philadelphia for manslaughter, found guilty and sentenced to a fine of $20.00 and six months in prison. The defense offered an argument of self-preservation, which had some merit hence the relatively light sentence and the jury's recommendation for leniency.The film ends with the survivors being rescued by a passing ship. At the finale the narrator returns, (nicely book-ending the story), explains that the real Holmes was tried, found guilty, sentenced to only six months due to the unusual circumstances and then asks the viewer to decide for themselves. This isn't Bergman or Campion or Kubrick but even so some serious thought went into this production.Another IMDb reviewer is very hard on this film, finding the plot absurd and unrealistic. Indeed it does appear fantastic, yet the historical accuracy is unusual for a movie in general and exceptional for 1957 US/UK co-production from Columbia Pictures. Before the invention of radio, ('wireless telegraphy'), in the late 19th and early 20th centuries, survivors of a disabled or sunken ship were pretty much on their own and had no way to call for help - the times when ships could literally "disappear without a trace." (Of course, at the time the movie takes place radio was well established - the script eliminates this inconsistency quite nicely.) The type of case the film is based on wasn't exactly unique: an excellent examination of the issues surrounding survival after shipwreck is "Cannibalism and the Common Law," A.W. Brian Simpson, University of Chicago Press, 1984. The book focuses on Regina v. Dudley & Stephens, the 1884 trial of two seamen for killing and eating the cabin-boy following the loss of the yacht Mignonette.Technically the film is very well done. The black and white photography is excellent and must have been difficult with so much water everywhere. The script has enough grit and rough edges to give it some real substance. Very good, solid performances by Tyrone Power, Mai Zetterling, Moira Lister, Lloyd Nolan and the rest of the cast. (Perhaps 'heroic' performances is more accurate given how often everyone on screen is soaked either from being immersed shoulders deep or from having spray blown onto them.) Often compared to Hitchcock's Lifeboat, which, I think, is a bit of apples & oranges as the claustrophobic locations are similar but the core plots distinct. Lifeboat is the earlier film and, not surprisingly, even though he had to make it up as he went along Hitchcock captured the claustrophobic feeling somewhat better. But director Richard Sale does a very good job as well and I would guess he probably had Lifeboat memorized before production started on Abandon Ship.David Langton, Gordon Jackson and Laurence Naismith have small parts: Langton and Jackson would work together again as the characters Richard Belamy and Angus Hudson, respectively, in the outstanding BBC series Upstairs, Downstairs of the early 1970s. Naismith plays the briefly surviving captain and the following year would play the Titanic's captain EJ Smith in A Night to Remember - not a lucky actor when given the command of a celluloid ship.Not flawless and perhaps a bit dated, but still a rather powerful, disturbing film. If this sort of story appeals, I recommend it very highly.XYZ

Richie-67-485852 Most excellent entertaining movie bringing us a cross section of life and real life situations with human nature at work. Some very difficult decisions have to be made in this movie by everyone involved. We are reminded that when not challenged, your opinion or belief just sits there. You may or may not ever know if it bears fruit. But when summoned into action, the we find out what works and what doesn't sometimes much to our own disbelief too. In this movie, the players and even the viewer is forced to confront themselves. Is what we are seeing acted out real and is it plausible? Yes, frighteningly so. Should we all die unnecessary deaths or should some live for the right reasons. What makes you more attractive to "live" and contribute than let's say the other guy? Strangely enough, it is not being judgmental when you see the other persons abilities or lack thereof. Observing what will or wont work is raw reality and then acting on it is raw courage. That is what you will find here. Sometimes the majority is wrong and the minority unsure, but going along to get along is not an option. This movie presents and proves that point. The stage is set well in the beginning and then leads to a point where it roller coasters...then hold on..Popcorm recommended, I roast fresh sunflower seeds and chomp away....Enjoy and do spread the word and may all your decisions be your own

Robert J. Maxwell A case study in raw utilitarianism -- "the greatest good for the greatest number." A cruise ship explodes at sea and there are twenty-six survivors who find themselves in, or clinging to, a small boat with minimal provisions, designed to carry only nine passengers.No distress call was sent out and the boat is adrift in the south Atlantic, fifteen hundred miles from the nearest coast. The captain is aboard the boat but promptly dies, leaving another officer, Tyrone Power, in command.Well, Power has inherited a mess. The ship had hit a derelict mine that exploded under the keel, killing almost all the other passengers. Some of the survivors are injured or otherwise weakened by age or illness. The engineer, Lloyd Nolan, is mortally wounded. With his last breath he urges Power to get rid of the detritus and keep only the strong aboard, who might have a chance if they row for Africa. Noland dives overboard and drowns himself. Power broods and decides in the end that Nolan was right. There are too many passengers and he decides to abandon the weak.Nobody is particularly happy about this sort of Darwinism at sea, especially the weak and injured. As is usually the case, everyone wants the greatest good for the greatest number, but everyone wants to be among the greatest number, not the smaller one. At gunpoint, Power orders a half dozen injured passengers overboard to be left behind -- also one effete playwright and his French poodle. There goes the opera singer, then the nuclear physicist. For some strange reason, a beautiful and sarcastic blond who is in her underwear is kept aboard. She can probably row or at least tell funny stories.Thus lightened, the little boat manages to survive a terrific storm that night. The next day, everyone is grateful to Tyrone Power for having had the courage to dispose of some of the jetsam. A spokesman for the survivors begins to make a formal speech of gratitude to the now-wounded Power. But he's interrupted by the arrival of a freighter that rescues them. The survivors then move away from Power and sit with their backs to him. According to the epilogue, Power was charged with murder and given the minimal sentence.One of the first things a viewer might notice about the film is that it's so disjointed that it must be "based on a true story." Else why does Power first climb aboard a raft with four others, then leave them and swim to the distant boat. What became of the raft and the people on it? Why is the raft and its passengers IN the movie if it hadn't happened to be there in historic reality? Second, wow, what a lot of familiar faces are in this boat. Not just Power and Nolan, but a lot of British actors and actresses whose faces will be familiar, if not their names.Third, in certain very general ways the film resembles Hitchcock's "Lifeboat" but is far cruder in its execution. No time here for a semi-comic romance between a communist stoker and a rich socialite. This is all grim, tense, and moves inexorably towards its ambiguous and arguable end. Anyone who finds this story as involving as I do might want to watch Michael Sandel's lecture on The Queen vs. Dudley and Stevens (1884), a case of cannibalism at sea. Can I include a link here? http://www.justiceharvard.org/2011/03/episode-01/#watch And it IS a gripping story. Tossing a dignified old opera diva overboard or a fairy playwright is one thing -- but a dog? "They'll be in the hands of God," says Power, but of course it's his hands that are putting them there. There isn't much room for character or development and, as I say, the movie rushes like an express train along its moral path. There is a black crew member aboard and, though he does get to sing a "Negro spiritual," at least he's a complaining pain in the neck most of the time. Power undergoes one transformation -- from not knowing what to do, to a solemn and unbreakable determination to save most of the passengers at the expense of a few of them. If there's a problem with that transformation it's that after it takes place Power seems to ENJOY his authority over the lives of others. The guy is pitiless. But it's hard to condemn him out of hand. I don't know what I'd have done -- probably melted away under the stress. What would anyone do? I honestly recommend catching Sandel's free lecture, which is anything but intimidating.

bobbobwhite This copycat film was not nearly as compelling as the late '40's film Lifeboat, the best post WWII lifeboat film. Both shared similar story lines, but Lifeboat had better actors and more interesting story twists.See Lifeboat instead. Much better cast and more subtle and effective acting than with the over-the-top, chew-the-scenery overacting from Tyrone Power. Lifeboat also had a good and sympathetic-til-the-end, rescued German sailer subplot that was effective in pulling our heartstrings until we saw that often things are not what they appear to be. They are often worse.