Aedonerre I gave this film a 9 out of 10, because it was exactly what I expected it to be.

Livestonth I am only giving this movie a 1 for the great cast, though I can't imagine what any of them were thinking. This movie was horrible

Robert Joyner The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

Teddie Blake The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

cfvgbhnjmk Great movie! When AFR was reviewed in the danish newspapers, the journalists found that the main theme of the movie was to provoke, and give an indirect critique of the former danish prime minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen. Maybe so... But this movie is much more. I personally find the story, of a young man desperately in love being gradually radicalized, to be the most interesting part of the movie. Great acting by all the "side"-characters makes this journey inside a desperate man's mind, very realistic and trustworthy.This movie is better if you are Danish.

Jaw What is the worst thing you can say about a movie that is supposed to provoke? God damn boring! Being Danish and having lived in Denmark during the time the move should portrait. I can say that the characters are completely unreal and the movie dose not in any way portrait the society it is supposed to.This movie is a complete waste of time and an embarrassment for the Danish film industry.Don't waste you time.

Bent Holshagen Hemmingsen I saw "AFR" last week in an inner city Copenhagen cinema with a few friends, all hoping to be provoked, inspired and certainly entertained. Well, we were all somewhat entertained by the absurdity of seeing the danish prime minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen portrayed absolutely fictionally vague in his grasp of political ideologies, as well as the pathetically desperate attempt at trying to cut him down to a very human size in the shape of a love-desperate closet homosexual, which allows us to both patronize and in the end sympathize with him. Somewhat entertaining. Ultimately failing at carrying the weight of the task the director attempts to undertake.Obviously the disclosure of the personal life of important political figures are somewhat interesting, but I'm utterly befuddled with why one would attempt at trying to raise such thought-provoking issues and absolutely vital questions concerning the current danish and international state of politics and the media, and in the end chose to go so exploitative and low-brow about it. What was supposed to be a movie about how tight the borders around such things as freedom of speech, sexuality, ideology, and so on, ended up being a rather hurried satirical tale told from a tongue tied at all times where it attempts to preach its personal definition of tolerance. If this is the consequence of the thinking that spawned such a feeble screenplay, then the thought process behind such writing is on all levels incredibly uninteresting in the context of the discussions that the movie tries to ignite.Granted, vulgar attempts at intellectualism aside, the movie is not entirely without merits, and one thing worth noting is the interesting use of editing interviews and manipulating words of various political figures portrayed in news footage. Such a practice is one known to be used by the popular media, and it's absolutely interesting to be witnessing this strategic instrument used to fabricate truths quite unlike those with whom we're accustomed to seeing the danish prime minister spun into.Technically, (without myself being a diploma-holding dramaturge) the pace of the movie seemed very rushed, not in the sense that there wasn't a decent build up. It just felt like the character development was so forced, and lacked subtlety to a tenth, which severely hurt the believability of the story that emerges from the premise. The acting was artificial at times, and though its was apparent to the audience that the format was documentary, many of the actors and actresses was obviously encouraged to try to "act" naturally. Something that made it extremely difficult to maintain a suspended disbelief.In short, this film was entertaining, but it failed at all attempts to raise any serious questions. Once the audience has become satisfied with mundane, such as "what if the prime minister was homosexual", then that's what the debate would be about. I give the movie 5 out of 10, and mostly because of the skilled, though unremarkable editing, and because of the element of sensationalism that the movie brings to the table.

tplesk Very impressive film. It's a sharp and thoughtful movie with provocative and make-you-think story. It appeals both to emotional and rational parts of your personality. I don't know if it's a real story or not, but it makes you believe. What is shown there is so damn true for the modern society! To describe it briefly it looks like a documentary that is built on the interviews with different people. One line of the plot is the story of Danish prime-minister's murder. The second line starts with a cruel murder of a young guy Emil. We hear people talking about prime-minister, then about Emil, discovering their personalities, gradually understanding where they came from and how they've become who they were. Both are much into politics, so it's a film not only about personalities, not only about love, death, self-expression and searching for one's place in the world. It is also about social problems, politics, globalization, extremism. It is definitely worth to see. I think a good movie is a movie that makes you feel a bit different after it's finished. This one does.