Steinesongo Too many fans seem to be blown away

Executscan Expected more

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

AshUnow This is a small, humorous movie in some ways, but it has a huge heart. What a nice experience.

yaktheripper Ehh, oh boy...this is way the heck out there. Disturbing as the day is long it is cold blooded and brutal and exceptionally filmed. This movie is revolting! That of course is it's strong point. I watched it and immediately tried to remove it from my memory. Is there some sort of message here? I don't know. Maybe. "Aftermath" was a movie I had laying around in a stack of DVD's, had no idea what it was, and was pretty shocked at what I saw. That is saying something. I have seen "Necromantik" and it's sequel and am a "fan" of both, for as high as the production value was for "Aftermath" the "story" couldn't hold the weight that "Necromantik" could emotionally. It is a "good looking" movie as previously stated, the production is tight and polished. The shock value is the only weight in the end however. See it as a curiosity and you will be shocked and even offended, but look for a story or meaning and you will be challenged.

Tanuccoon This really isn't a movie. Hell, there really isn't even a story (nor is there talking). It's just some shock content and an overly long opening credits (around 5 minutes, which is absurd for a 30 minute film). While it's not exactly art it's definitely different. The film concerns a morgue where some morticians are doing autopsies. Later, one of the morticians proceeds to violate a female corpse while he's alone. The film features full-body nudity although I'm not sure if the bodies were fakes, real corpses donated to "the arts", or actors with prosthetic effects. Either way you see full-bodied nudity (both genders).There's a weirdness to the whole thing. The scene with the morticians just going over their bodies is somewhat surreal. There's a bizarre character development that takes place despite the lack of speech and most of the mortician's face being obscured. His eyes convey his bizarre curiosity as he examines one of the men's naked frames, seemingly stopping on the genitalia. Later on when he starts with the female he seems to gingerly cut free her clothes. He plays with his blade delicately against her skin... then he guts her open. And a little after that the film really starts to get graphic, although I will say that he only uses one hand to examine her... There's a definite progression to the depravity.It's a film that I wouldn't really think I'd be interested in but there was a certain oddity to this premise. And while the initial legitimate autopsies were harder for me to watch, a morbid curiosity better kept my attention for the second half especially since it was almost downright funny in places. I'm honestly not sure what they were going for with this, though. It's short, it's a little weird, but mostly it's just pointless. All the same it's really not bad and somehow has a strange charm to it. Ultimately it's more silly than disturbing, almost like an angsty teen's attempt to be edgy.

sddavis63 This Spanish short film (if you take away the opening and closing credits) it probably comes in at about 24 minutes) is not for those who have queasy stomachs. It's set in a morgue and deals with the preparation of corpses. The opening 10 minutes or so is disturbingly graphic, but offers a portrayal of the probably fairly typical activities that are involved in the work. Be warned, though. Bodies are sliced open and organs are pulled out. It's very graphic. After that, though, the movie leaves the realm of graphic and becomes really quite sickening.When the body of a young woman is brought into the morgue we discover that one of the morgue workers is - to put it bluntly - quite depraved. Alone with the body, he engages in very violent and very graphic necrophilia. This part of the movie isn't pleasant. It's not even interesting. It's quite sick.Credit has to be given for the very realistic look to everything, and the performance of the actor playing the depraved morgue worker was quite good and quite believable. There are no words spoken in the film. When communication is necessary (as the movie begins there are two workers in the morgue) it's all done with the eyes. So, yes, credit for those things, but this is nevertheless a disturbing and unpleasant film to watch, and in all honesty it seems to lack any particular purpose or goal. Only for the strong points mentioned above I'd give this a 3/10.

gerard1976 This movie is not so good as I thought it would be. There is no story whatsoever, no characters and some dialog would have been nice. The gore effects are good and it gets quite bloody at times but nothing over the top. It starts with an autopsy on a man and when that is over the scene with the girl starts. The music is a classic score and fits the movie very well. They should have made a 90 minutes version in which they could have had some time for character development so we can feel sorry for the person on the autopsy table. And some more info about the morticians would have made this movie far scarier than it is. Don't expect a scary movie but a nice, gory special effects reel.