Thehibikiew Not even bad in a good way

Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Teddie Blake The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.

Billie Morin This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Harman Singh Giving 6 out of 10 while comparing this movie with James Bond series.Positive/Negative: 1. Nice plot for the first part of this new series, but screenplay could have been more interested by only if roles of the actors had been picked up with the pace of the storyline, and I felt Rajat Sharma and Gulshan Grover were wasted with their lame roles, But anyhow "Taimoor Pasha" might be useful in their next sequel.2. Actors are nice but it could have been excellent. Saif needs to look more like a spy and not like a college going boy (only Dress-ups). Kareena was excellent so as Ram Kapoor and Adil Hussain.3. Item Girls are okay but not top of the line; only Malika Haydon was good but she has not shown enough like Bond gals. other wise that Russian gal was so so.4. Camero was used which was old and outdated for a spy movies when they have shown Bugatti Veyron in a Punjab video. 5. Neulcear bomb was like a playing machine it could have been like real nuclear weapon next time try GOGGLE for this thing6. Action scenes were lame comparing with James Bond but far better than "Ek Tha tiger", "Rowdy Rathore", "Dabbang" or "Ready".---------------------------------------------------------------------Anyways there is a famous phase "Rome wasn't built in one day" Will see the next movie with more expectations.---------------------------------------------------------------------Note: this movie is not for those who like Rowdy Rathore Ready or bullshit.

salman surti I don't understand why everyone seems to be criticizing this movie of being lengthy and boring!! well on a personal note, i absolutely loved it! It was more like an Indian (Desi) version of the Bourne series or even the James Bond! As far as acting is concerned, i believe the young nawab (Saif) has done a wonderful job and so has all the other characters. I see that lots of people are hating it due to the Pakistan (ISI) connection, which i do understand was indeed exaggerated. Also due to this the movie was banned in Pakistan. However, talking from a strict entertainer perspective, this is a complete package of everything. You get action, adventure, thrill, humor, and nonetheless Saif's and Kareena's light hearted love and hate relationship.I've rated the movie 9/10. Although i just wanted to give it 7, but since i wanna appreciate such cinema and want the Indian film industry to carry on with such experiments i added 2 more points.

Aayan Mirza Well let me start by saying that this film isn't for those who think Salman Khan is the best actor in the world, Ready and body guard are best films and Item numbers and 3rd class comedy is all what film should gross on at box office. Has anyone thought about why films like 'Game, players and now Agent Vinod' are continuously failing at box office, while films with Hollywood films of similar genre gross heavily at American and UK box office its actually the problem of audience in India and in Pakistan too(cause I am from Pakistan). Agent Vinod was a film for smart audience, It was at least a try to do something out of the box. In the whole world characters like Jason Bourne (Bourne trilogy), Ethan Hunt (MI Series), James Bond (James Bond films) are liked by masses and people are mad about their upcoming films and here in subcontinent we admire heroes like those from Om Shanti Om or Ready or even Golmaal. Anyways film was above average overall, action was quite good, some camera angles were really absurd that I couldn't understand why the scene is shot in that way, but still nice try to deviate. Yes there were too much characters, I don't think that many characters were needed. It was one of the very few films where it was at least tried to keep things as natural as possible, preciously in most of the films, if the shooting location had to be abroad, to keep themselves out of effort, filmmakers use to place characters of same language on those locations, like Indian police officers at Istanbul or Malaysia but here characters were kept original. Movie duration was too long that and was unnecessarily dragged I dun know. If it's some sort of a basic requirement for all Indian films to 2 hour+ duration then it's a real bad policy. Story was good, not that compact (most probably due to duration) but overall it was good. Characters were not only too much but weren't placed that well, the raw chief didn't look like one. An intelligence chief should be smart, handsome and quick like they portrayed the ISI chief. The ISI chief was looking dashing (and being a Pakistani I liked that). But seriously guys, Raw chief should have looked like one who deserves to be on that seat. The story was little bit confusing as well, some characters weren't described that well. Also at one side it was shown that ISI chief is so smart and the agency is so strong that it helps a doctor being escaped from a British jails and then operate her for their missions and on the hand a colonel is gone rogue and ISI has no information about it, and especially in such a case where that colonel isn't trusted well within the army too. If he isn't trusted, ISI would have been keeping an eye on him or something but no such thing..so directors and writers need to go in all such details as well. Music was good but wasn't really necessary. It seems like Indians think that Mujra is the supreme part of Pakistani events. it isn't like this, we don't have Mujra's on our wedding, For God's Sake, a wedding is a family event. So (if) filmmakers go for any sequel of this film (which I don't believe they would ever think of) then all such little details should be in their mind. In One line, Agent Vinod was Bond + Bourne + BoLLYWOOD + DRAGGED + NOT WELL THOUGHT = above average..

chinvikul Calling this 2:30 hours long video a movie, would be an insult to the rest. Movie starts with some random action scene. This scene pretty much gives you a glimpse of whats coming to you. Bad guys die in tons, good guys don't even get a scratch, chicks falling for the hero etc. you get it all right.1. Its very bad script. It totally defies logic. There are many instances where you would cry out "why didn't you simply did *this*?"2. Too many characters. After 15 minutes into movie, you stop keeping track of locations, characters, questions you hope would be resolved later and people dying. Also, 2:30 hours is way too lengthy.3.Very bad editing.4. In a movie, one or two twists are accepted. When you twist the story every couple of minutes and use some random codewords which don't make much sense, you loose interest and the plot.5. Bad jokes. Really very bad jokes.