WasAnnon Slow pace in the most part of the movie.

Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good

Hulkeasexo it is the rare 'crazy' movie that actually has something to say.

Beulah Bram A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.

iamtherobotman What the actual Hell was this? The 1970's Original had an innocence to it that this pile of c**p was lacking in shovels(never mind spades). What is it with the US film industry that they take what was a decent Film and turn it into a steaming pile of Dog s***e? How can they do it with such amazing regularity almost effortlessly? Instead of Rural France and two English Girls on a holiday, we have Rural Argentina( for some reason?? Why not Canada for example) and two dumb Yank Birds and a sex trafficking syndicate!! What?? Then we have the entire community seemingly in on this kidnapping scheme - again, What?? Some of the acting was passable but sadly the vast majority was abysmal. Amber Heard may look good, but for the love of all our sanity, please Hen, give up the acting. You're clearly no good at it!! The whole thing was awful, with the only similarity with the original ( which is far superior by the way) being 2 girls, holiday, one goes missing. Other than that, nope! Terrible Film, truly awful. They've taken a decent wee story and tried to tart it up and only succeeded in killing it completely.

mjsreg This is a very bad American remake of a classic British film.The original is atmospheric and has quality craftsmanship all the way thought it.This version is trashy commercial rubbish and has tacky horrible all the way through.This is full of stupid teenagers talking in an incredibly annoying way which seems to be a trademark of 'formula' films of this kind.Do yourself a favour and watch the original. It may be an oldie but it is far superior in every way.A definite 'miss'

Mitch Floratos Although this movie may have had a few cliché characters, I think it well a well put story with a great storyline. The acting in this film was also quite honorable, and I think the main reason I feel this film deserves more credit than it receives is because it is a lot different to all of the other thrillers. The story surprised me and I felt this movie was a one to watch, not only because of it's storyline, but the actors in it really portrayed the characters well.I give this an 8 out of 10.Cheers for the great watch

Theo Robertson I was intrigued about seeing this American remake of an overlooked British thriller from 1970 . The original isn't considered a classic although what it does it does very well . One worries that it'd be a simple case of taking a story featuring two young British females in France and transplanting two American airheads in to the remote Argentine wilderness Guess what this film does for the first two thirds ? And it does so in a lacklustre way leaving you thinking is the original so good at what it did or is the remake so bad ? Considering the plot revolves a young woman going missing I thought perhaps the setting might bring a political subtext to the film . Argentina in the 1970s and early 80s was of course the country where suspected troublemakers would disappear never to be seen again but there's no political commentary to this film which is just a straight forward thriller based on a superior film It does go its own way in the final third and again it's not entirely successful as the plot then turns in to a backwoods brutality type of movie similar to the Aussie thriller WOLF CREEK without the torture porn aspect and instead sees the female protagonist turn in to a Lara Croft clone . It's mildly entertaining to a very mild degree but no more than that and is disappointing compared to the British original that was both tension filled and credible