Kidskycom It's funny watching the elements come together in this complicated scam. On one hand, the set-up isn't quite as complex as it seems, but there's an easy sense of fun in every exchange.

Catangro After playing with our expectations, this turns out to be a very different sort of film.

Kodie Bird True to its essence, the characters remain on the same line and manage to entertain the viewer, each highlighting their own distinctive qualities or touches.

Brenda The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

mark.waltz That mastermind of sophisticated deviousness, George Sanders, turns heroic as a British correspondent who turns traitor to turn on the Nazi's and destroy them right in front of their schwatickered backs. He does it very cleverly too, in a somewhat convoluted plot line which reveals that other major characters may not be whom they claim to be as well. He's joined by two darkly beautiful women, Marguerite Chapman and Gale Sondergaard, characters with German sounding names who may or may not be on the side of the Nazi's. Typical war propaganda is no better, but certainly not worse, than other films of its kind of the war years, of which there were dozens. It flows by quickly, but is often perplexing as it moves from one segment of deception and danger to another. Sanders, an excellent actor in villain roles, easily convinces his British pals that he's betrayed them, and that makes the betrayal all the more believable. You can understand why even the Nazi's are fooled. It served a purpose during war, and now serves as a reminder of what the future needs to avoid if continuing freedom will prevail.

SimonJack One interesting thing about "Appointment in Berlin" is that it shows the mixed attitudes of the Brits in the time leading up to World War II. That includes different opinions among the military, and public expressions of disagreements. Few films made during the war, or after, show this. The same thing was true in the U.S. There were strong divisions of public opinion. Many wanted the U.S. to stay out of any conflict in Europe. Others were anxious for America to help defend Europe from the growing Nazi tyrannies and threats. I suppose that after December 7, 1941, when much of the world was at war, movie makers didn't see much sense in spending film space to cover the divisions of public opinion before the war. But I think it is very important that we remember this for history and for lessons it may hold for today and the future. So, this film has some historical value in that regard. The plot is quite original with some very unusual twists even for the genre of espionage. For instance, how many people would be willing to go to prison for 18 months, and endure public disgrace, as part of a ploy to becoming an espionage agent? There were some far-fetched things done during the war – many that the public didn't learn about for decades after the war. And, by now, most people should realize that almost anything is possible in the realm of clandestine operations. George Sanders played his role perfectly as Keith Wilson. He was a dissident, then discharged, then dishonored RAF Wing Commander. The answer to the rhetorical question I asked – who would endure prison and such disgrace – is, "A true patriot." And Wilson's role makes it clear that he is a true English patriot. In the scene when the secret service recruits Wilson, Col. Patterson (played very well by Alan Napier) says he knows of no one who cares more about England than Wilson. His resolution for the sacrifice he is about to make in suffering dishonor and serving a prison term is reinforced on Wilson's face when he looks at a British flag on a building as his car drives by it. The romance aspect of this film is more legitimate than many that seem to be thrown into wartime movies to give them more public appeal. In this case, Ilse Von Preising is the attractive German woman whom Wilson must pursue in England and then on the Riviera. Through her, he hopes to get into the Nazi propaganda field in which her brother, Rudolph, is a top officer. Marguerite Chapman plays Ilse, and the relationship blossoms into love, but it isn't played up very much. Ilse initially falls for Wilson but then cools when he seems to so eagerly embrace the Nazi way. She changes again toward the end when she finds out Wilson is a British agent. Her character seems cool throughout, and somewhat wooden at times. Wilson too, shows uncertainty about her in his face at times. He can't figure out if she is a hard core Nazi, or if she has sympathies for the Allies. The rest of the cast for the film are good in their roles. Among the major supporting roles are Onslow Stevens as Rudolph, Gale Sondergaard as Greta Van Leyden, and Steven Geray as Henri Rader. He is the owners of the Riviera casino and a Nazi supporter. Two American broadcast reporters, Babe Forrester and Bill Banning, are played well by Jack Lee and Don Douglas, respectively. "Appointment in Berlin" is a Columbia movie released in America on July 15, 1943. IMDb doesn't have any information on when (or if) it was released in Great Britain. Since it's about British intelligence in the war, I would think it would have been shown in England. But, maybe there was a reason for not showing it across the pond during the war. The story and screenplay are very good. The directing and acting are good. I couldn't find much information about the shooting locations, so it most likely was filmed all in the U.S. Columbia's lots would have worked for the London and Berlin scenes, and the southern France coastline was most likely shot somewhere on the California coast. At times, the scenes seem stagy – as though they were on a studio lot and not out in the real world. Only one aspect of the movie is quite terrible. The scene at the end with the bombing of the Nazi ships and invasion craft on the Frisian Islands. It's clear that this scene is all models and not real. The explosions and crashing planes are OK, but the antiaircraft searchlights are very amateurish. They look like what they most likely were – white strips pasted on a black background and then quickly covered or removed when they were bombed. The ending may not suit some people, but it is a fitting one, especially for the leads, Keith Wilson and Ilse Von Preising. Some see this as a propaganda film, but it's clearly an action film about espionage. It does have a subtle message to audiences that all may not be as it appears regarding people and events during war. This is a movie worthy having in any good World War II film collection.

blanche-2 George Sanders stars with Marguerite Chapman in "Appointment in Berlin," a 1943 film directed by Alfred E. Green.Sanders plays Keith Wilson, who is disgusted by his fellow Brits believing that Hitler will abide by any non-aggression treaty and speaks out against their passivity. Because he is an RAF officer, he is dismissed from the service. A friend (Alan Napier) in the secret service recruits him to pose as a traitor/Nazi sympathizer and spy for England.Wilson is given the job of doing radio broadcasts, and by embedding a code in his speeches, he is able to give valuable information to Britain. Meanwhile, he falls for his Nazi boss' sister Ilse (Chapman), who seems unsupportive of her brother's actions.Though this is kind of a downer - it's about war, after all - it's a good movie. Sanders gives his usual smooth, charming performance, though I think he was capable of much more. He had a wonderful voice and screen presence and livened up many a film.I also liked Gail Sondergaard as a member of the underground. I actually didn't find Marguerite Chapman was all that good, though very pretty. Many years ago, before the Internet, I used to get a magazine for memorabilia collectors, and she had an ad in the classifieds to sell her personal memorabilia. I actually wasn't familiar with her at that time.Worth seeing.

origin1860 I enjoyed this movie. Love these movies from the forties. This is one of four war dramas that George Sanders made in 1943. Sanders was handsome and charming as usual and watching him play a counterspy and a hero was fun. He gave an excellent performance. You can count on Sanders to make a movie worth watching. He played the role of RAF officer Keith Wilson, who is dismissed from the RAF in disgrace after bitingly criticizing the British peace pact with Hitler in 1938. He is recruited by the British secret service and ends up in Berlin as an apparent traitor giving propaganda broadcasts for the Germans, but his talks contain secret codes which help the British. The other actors played their parts well also. Of course there was a love interest. I always enjoy it when Sanders gets the girl. The only bad part of the movie was Sanders' death in the end.