Afouotos Although it has its amusing moments, in eneral the plot does not convince.

FuzzyTagz If the ambition is to provide two hours of instantly forgettable, popcorn-munching escapism, it succeeds.

Grimossfer Clever and entertaining enough to recommend even to members of the 1%

Scotty Burke It is interesting even when nothing much happens, which is for most of its 3-hour running time. Read full review

supergroove00 OK, this movie was completely unnecessary.After seeing Arn: The Knight Templar i was completely satisfied with it, and decided to watch Arn: The Kingdom at Road's End, because i thought it will be decent sequel.If you saw Arn: The Knight Templar, Arn - Tempelriddaren (original title) from 2007, you will notice only 15-20 minutes of new scenes in this 2008 release.Do not watch both movies, you'll waste your time!!!So, my question is why bother and make the same movie?1/10

steph20458 Just about to watch this film - haven't read the book but it is next on my list.Have to say I thought the first movie was brilliant - even with the subtitle - and I have read the first two books.Obviously it wasn't possible to include everything in the movie but there was enough to whet the appetite for the sequel.As a Scot I wouldn't put too much store on the Braveheart comparison. Braveheart was a Hollywood abomination with little or no respect for the real story - eg No bridge at the Battle of Stirling Bridge!!! As for Troy - the first and greatest epic tale ever written (which I have also read) - Hollywood once again creates a vile and obscene version of the tale, changing the story to make sure Brad Pitt survives until the final scenes and allowing Paris to survive the final battle (and what was the pronunciation of the names about) Despite some negative comments I am looking forward to watching this movie and will mark it later.

Bor_Bas a bit low-budget, but a wonderful, warm tale. I enjoyed it almost as much as i enjoyed the first one. Haven't read the book, though, so don't know how it measures up to the original, but all in all i would very much recommend it. Nice scenery and locations, good acting. Could have done a bit more with the scenes set in the Holy Land, maybe played up a bit the Saracens he brought back home to Sweden with him later on. One of the things i really enjoyed was that they weren't spilling buckets of blood all over the place, i hate this recent trend which puts the emphasis on "gory"....I have to say i will be checking for new productions in the genre from Sweden....

Brubaker19 Most of the people who have given poor reviews for this movie have read the book - they then seem to compare the two but most people here won't have read the book, like myself. I thought the movie was, in conjunction with the 1st one, the best of last year...and I watch a lot of movies...So the story takes off from where the last one ended. It moves a little faster than the previous movie, which I also enjoyed, and there is plenty of character development. I did identify with the characters in Tempelriddaren (2007) and so was very much ready for their last adventure.This film will not disappoint and the final scene where he rides onto the battlefield will bring a lump to your throat...Super film - don't judge the movie by the film and go and enjoy it instead.