PlatinumRead Just so...so bad

filippaberry84 I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.

Roy Hart If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

Matylda Swan It is a whirlwind of delight --- attractive actors, stunning couture, spectacular sets and outrageous parties.

Michael_Elliott Jimmy Fund: At Home With Joan Crawford (1953) *** (out of 4) This short film was made to help raise money for the Jimmy Fund, which was a hospital in Boston that took care of children with cancer. The film shows Joan Crawford walking out of her daughter's bedroom and heading for the camera where she talks about the children with the disease and then asks people to donate money. Several of these shorts were made back in the 1950s and if you're a fan of Crawford then you'll want to check this out. This isn't the most cheerful short ever made but it did serve its purpose. It's rather sad to think that 55-years after this was released that we're no closer to any cure.

utgard14 Brief public service announcement for the Jimmy Fund for children with cancer. It's basically just Joan Crawford saying goodnight to her children (we never see them -- I assume the voices are from actors), then descending a staircase and talking directly to the camera about this cause. That's it. Why it is so low-rated on IMDb is a mystery. I gave it a middle-ground score because basically it's just an ad for a charity. There isn't anything good or bad about it on a technical level. There's no "story." I certainly have no beef with the cause. Who would? I assume that its low score is because of the "Mommie Dearest" allegations that have colored people's perceptions of Joan so much that the opening part where she says goodnight to her children is being met with a judgment of some kind. If that's the case, it's pathetic to me but people can vote however they want. Anyway, it's just a harmless well-meaning public service ad.

charlytully A totally naive person might wonder why an ancient public service announcement (PSA) is taken note of on IMDb. The reason is that Joan Crawford appears in it. That's right, if Nadine Schwackhammer, who has never had a SAG card, recorded a PSA for a local Cedar Rapids TV station 10 years ago for the Beulah Benzie Park Beautification Project, that PSA--apples to donuts--would NOT be here on IMDb. However, the average PSA recorded by Crawford, or Kate Hepburn, Gary Cooper, Jean Harlow, Clark Gable, Betty Davis, Cary Grant, Marilyn Monroe, Jimmy Stewart, and the other major stars in Hollywood's firmament are MORE worthy to be archived here than the average TV sit-com episode of MY MOTHER THE CAR or CAR 54, WHERE ARE YOU? (even though these ALSO have their own niche on IMDb). The reason being, that researchers need access to every minute of screen time that EVER has been publicly released by such figures. C'mon, this is not just Lindsay Lohan getting out of a car, or something.Like any ratable item, Joan's PSA for the Jimmy Fund SHOULD be judged in the context of its own genre and time period. Know-nothings who automatically rate things a "1" because they're from the 1930s, or they're shorts, or they're black-and-white or silent, or some actor named "David" is in it and they divorced a "David," or they read MOMMIE DEAREST may LEGALLY be able to vote in the IMDb ratings process, but their arbitrary nuisance marks are absolutely no different from spitting into a punch bowl: they are spoiling something other people value. This is a definition of vandalism, if there ever was one.Raising money for child cancer victims, which Joan was doing when this plea for Boston's Jimmy Fund was made at New England theaters (followed by the movie ushers passing the hat) is no laughing matter. Joan begins the PSA at the top of a staircase, presumably leading to the kids' rooms at her own home. She does NOT mention wire hangers at all. This is a straight-forward plea for a worthy cause, and deserves at least a rating of "7." They were not attempting to make WHATEVER HAPPENED TO BABY JANE? here; they were just trying to keep little kids from dying before their time. It is really sad that dozens of meanies cannot get this through their brains.

DeanandJoplinforever yes this short is dated and could possibly be seen as money grabbing but it is for a good cause....the Jimmy fund! which i believe is for cancer research, and Joan is delectable as always, the users who gave this a 1 rating are either, Joan haters, uncharitable or just plain dumb. Most people don't know but Joan actually anonymously paid for (most of her life) a hospital bed for people who don't have much money for them to use. She's not the child beating sado-masochistic mother that her Jealous daughter Christina (John Travolta) makes her out to be, she was a beautiful woman outside, but especially inside and is still to this day loved and missed.