Perry Kate Very very predictable, including the post credit scene !!!

Actuakers One of my all time favorites.

Micah Lloyd Excellent characters with emotional depth. My wife, daughter and granddaughter all enjoyed it...and me, too! Very good movie! You won't be disappointed.

Patience Watson One of those movie experiences that is so good it makes you realize you've been grading everything else on a curve.

MisterWhiplash Once again, I'm not so certain if it were not for the return of Mystery Science Theater and having this particular title (one of the many that they've taken on over the years from Roger Corman) I would have gone out of my way to see it. And surprisingly it has a pedigree cast, and for a Corman production for one of the handful of times in his career he spent a little extra money - though, also as well, it didn't make money back. The reasoning to make it seems fair enough: cash in on the disaster-movie binge of the period (Irwin Allen became for a short time a little like a bigger-ish spending Corman for these disaster flicks with Towering Inferno for example), and have a little of Jaws in there for good measure. Of course the creature this time is the actual avalanche itself, though that doesn't happen for more than halfway into the movie.What we get stuck with, then, are the human beings and their (sorta) dramas and conflicts; a day later after seeing the movie, I remember that Mia Farrow - who looks like she sorely needs some actual direction to work from - is trying to avoid having to talk long with her ex played by Rock Hudson, though since they're in the same spot she doesn't have much of a choice. While he is running what is a sports competition (I think?) and there's also some small drama involving an ice-skating competition (yes, this is a plot point, and it comes back around during the act of the title), and not to mention Robert Forrester, who I didn't even know was in the movie until watching it, who is the Sheriff ala Jaws of the movie trying to warn people about the oncoming avalanche that could happen.So many stupid things happen here (not least of which how the avalanche gets started), and Farrow and Hudson have less than zero chemistry. What makes it fun (outside of the robot commentary) is that the actors are taking this ever so seriously, even Farrow who seems like she should be having fun (and, occasionally, like when she's in the car trying to get away with some of the others after the avalanche happens, is having *too* good a time, smiling and looking like she has that less-than-zero direction going on), and the cheesiness of the effects. But the funniest WTF part of all goes to Rock Hudson's character's mother, who has some of the battiest dialog in moments. Oh, and I'd be remiss not to point out a moment where a character falls out of a moving/spinning-out-of-control car as it then careens off a cliff. That's pretty hysterical and awesome to behold, commentary besides.I think the frustrating part of Avalanche is how long it takes for it to happen, and then how comparatively to what comes before how fast the post-avalanche events occur. There's a death-defying rescue of characters, and Hudson and Farrow sharing some champagne (I won't say when they do it, that's a spoiler, pshaw me to do such a thing for AVALANCHE!) And then... the movie just ends. It's a slim 90 minutes where we get to see characters who don't have much chemistry act off one another - Forrester is a little better than Hudson with Farrow, but not by much - and other side characters who don't get much developed aside from their tropes. So it's a knock-off of what was already a silly genre of the 70's - and man oh man is this very 70's (a performance midway through at the ski-lodge by the rock band Paladin is evidence of that), but for the purposes of MST3K it works like gangbusters.

Coventry I'm an avid fan-boy of 1970's disaster movies. Not so much because they're intense and captivating since, quite frankly they're not, but actually just because they're so exaggeratedly clichéd and kitschy. You can easily summarize ALL the 70's disaster movies ever made with one and the same synopsis, only the nature of the disaster differs. It can be a fire, flood, volcanic eruption, virus, shipwreck or – like in this case – an avalanche! The main difference between this film and the majority of classic titles (such as "The Towering Inferno" and "The Poseidon Adventure") lies in the budget. Usually Irwin Allen produced this sort of stuff and he had plenty of money to spare. "Avalanche", on the other hand, is a Roger Corman production and he's mostly (in)famous for delivering cheap and extremely low-budgeted cult films. A half-decent disaster movie is simply impossible to accomplish without a bit of budget, and this clearly shows in "Avalanche". The special effects are pitiable, with whole bunches of people getting buried underneath thick and oddly shaped boulders of Styrofoam. But, aside from the budgetary restrictions, "Avalanche" does live up to four out of five essential disaster movie trademarks. #1: there needs to be at least one major star and a long list of secondary stars. Rock Hudson and Mia Farrow were big names around the time, but the supportive cast is a bit disappointing. I assume that Roger Corman spent all his actors' budget on the aforementioned two names and Robert Forster. #2: The characters are usually split into two camps with completely opposite ideals and/or initiatives. Why, yes! Although the "righteous" camp is extremely small this time. Rock Hudson is the owner of a fancy winter sport resort in Colorado and he keeps on expanding the area to lure more tourists. Robert Forster is the tree-hugging reporter who endlessly warns him that the expansion needs to stop otherwise there will be avalanches. #3: regardless what type of disaster we're dealing with, variants of the exact same perilous situations are always applicable. Too true, we have people that are buried alive, trapped in ski lifts, crushed or dead in gas explosions. #4: always remember that, when the situation appears to be at it worst, it can and will still get even worse! That's another true cliché of the disaster film! In "Avalanche", for example, there's a sequence in which an ambulance transporting people who narrowly escaped dead already, crashes into a ravine! Only for die-hard disaster movie fanatics.

bkoganbing I was surprised to see that Avalanche was produced by Roger Corman of all people. I would think that even the skimpy budget that this film had by Irwin Allen standards was not something Roger Corman was used to dealing with. Corman didn't spend it on big name guest stars for sure. His stars are Rock Hudson and Mia Farrow. Hudson is the Donald Trump like owner of a big state of the art ski lodge which is hosting that weekend some winter sporting events. He's been told like William Holden in The Towering Inferno that the lodge is in a bad place and the snow looks like it's about to come a tumbling down.Tumble down it did during a storm when a plane crashes into the top of a mountain. The Avalanche starts and it buries the whole cast in that white stuff. This is a disaster film made on the cheap, some winter sports footage mixed with real avalanche footage and some cheesy special effects by seventies standards to bind it together. The plot such as it is, is almost non-existent, the characters are never developed in the slightest, so you don't really care about them.I guess the lesson to be learned from Avalanche is for Roger Corman not to try to be Irwin Allen.

man_your_ugly Though Rock Hudson is my favorite actor, his acting in this film is very amateurish and highly unbelievable. Mia Farrow's performance is also wooden and I have seen better acting in school plays by grammar school students. Of course, the fact that other than a fake avalanche, there is no substance or story line that I could perceive to this film. The only good actor was Robert Forster and he also had the best script. I couldn't believe it was made in 1978 because I felt it probably was one of the training films made by new actors and actresses in order to develop their craft for Mia and Rock. I wouldn't view it again.