Solidrariol Am I Missing Something?

SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

Bluebell Alcock Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Benedito Dias Rodrigues Another B movie that explain a hundred years of British occupation in India,l like this genre of movie,they are cheap entertainment but have a charming of those glorious days in 50',almost done in studios with fine sets gave us a good feeling of nostalgia.Arlene Dahl was so gorgeous,but Hudson didn't like to kiss,sorry for him missing a good opportunite to take in arms such beauty girl!! Fine casting with Arnold Moss,Michael Ansara,Torin Tatcher and the exotic beauty of Ursula Thiess,as a friend mine said,how more B,more better it is!!Resume:First watch: 2018 / How many: 1 / Source: DVD / Rating: 6.5

MartinHafer "Bengal Brigade" is a strange movie for two reasons in particular-- the casting as well as its championing British colonialism. As far as the casting goes, several Americans without even a hint of a British accent were cast (such as Rock Hudson and Arlene Dahl)...and Hudson seemed completely out of place here. By the 1950s, the British Empire was being split apart and colonialism was on its way out and India had already gained its independence...yet this American film is another 'Hizzuh and three cheers for the Empire' sort of picture they made in the 1930s. We are supposed to be rooting for the Brits in this one...though the Indians were fighting for self-determination, an admirable thing!The film begins with Captain Claybourne (Hudson) being court martialed unfairly. The problem was that the man in charge during battle was indecisive and suffering from anxiety...and Claybourne took command. Later, the C.O. lied to save his reputation and Claybourne was charged with disobeying and striking his C.O....and soon he's out of the British army. There's some stuff after this...but it's all unimportant until the great Sepoy Rebellion which breaks out soon thereafter (in 1857)...and the film actually did a very good job of explaining it...most other films set during this time don't bother explaining why many Indians revolted against British rule.Overall, a rather dull film that covers a lot of familiar material but which seems hopelessly out of date with changing times and attitudes.

mark.waltz While this is certainly a very entertaining movie, it doesn't at all obviously historically accurate. Obviously told from the British perspective, it is the story of the uprising of Indian rebels against the British rule of their motherland and the British officer (Rock Hudson!) who professes love for both England and India. He is put on trial after false testimony concerning an order he was accused of not obeying and he is basically court-martialed. The Indian Raja wants to utilize his military skills to train Indian soldiers to fight against the British army which would automatically make him a traitor or cause his instant death the minute he refused the Raja. This leads to battle scenes where the British, who had basically tried to take over most of the world by this point in real history, are presented as heroes, and the Raja and his followers as the villain.Centuries of British rule obviously caused anger in the Indian natives, and here, there are also rumors that the British purposely put cow fat on the bullets that they sell to the Hindus and pig fat on the bullets they sell to the Muslims. The Hindus and Muslims believe that this will make them return to the earth as slugs, but as they reveal, this is only a method of the Raja to turn the natives against the British. This makes the rebels rather one dimensional and put sympathy on the English. Of course, with Hudson present, there's also a romantic triangle, with him in love with the General's daughter (Arlene Dahl) at the beginning but breaking up with her out of bitterness as to his fate, and later hanging around a beautiful Indian girl (Ursula Theiss).The action sequences are well done, and there is also a very tense hunting scene with Hudson and a tiger seeing eye to eye as they stalk each other. It is beautifully photographed and features gorgeous costumes and scenery, but there is never any doubt in my mind that Hudson is not at all believable as being British. So with all the films that Hollywood has made which distort history for dramatic effect or for other motives, its best to take them with a grain of salt, roll your eyes as little as possible, then do your own research to figure out what really happened in the history that they are trying to present.

TrevorLupus A thoroughly enjoyable story. Rock Hudson is cashiered from the Regiment for disobeying a direct order, in order to save his men from slaughter. He is still loyal to the Raj and ultimately his loyalty to his men is returned to him in the last exciting action scene when India is in the throws of the Mutiny. Excellent action scenes and characterisations make this a movie well worth watching.