Boobirt Stylish but barely mediocre overall

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Lela The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

Wyatt There's no way I can possibly love it entirely but I just think its ridiculously bad, but enjoyable at the same time.

Maddox Cox If i could give it a zero, i would, i have never seen it but i hate Evan!The animation is terrible, and kids should not make movies unless they do at least 6 years of animation school.This is a rotten tomato.0/10

mrmut Sometimes you get a hold of the movie, which makes instantly clear to you that it would be impossible to produce it in US (most of the movie production), or other studios around the world. That is mostly because Scandinavians have a very "intimate" way of depicting mosty anything in their movies. Their movies are often focused on interrelations that are often deemed unacceptable or inappropriate in other countries.Good example would be "Let the Right One In" (Låt den rätte komma in), which would be essentially impossible to record in US.Beyon Beyond has substance, the characters are not black and white - they are complex; both bad and good at the same time. All of the movie is in positive, childish tone, which makes it a pleasant experience to watch and learn from it, especially for children.While this movie is not something "stellar", like Nauciaa, or Laputa, or Wall-e..., it has qualities beyond the ratings. The way this movie is made, is characteristically immersive, specific to Scandinavian culture, and I absolutely recommend it.Watch it with your kid, and let it learn from it. We made a projection for 4yr old boy who loves spaceships and rockets, and he really liked this move. He asked to watch it again at some point later on.

Reno Rangan Animated film from Sweden? I don't remember I have seen one. So probably this is my first from that region. It was less than 80 minutes, that means short and sweet. They should have stretched it a bit longer, but the point of the narration was perfectly accomplished, so it does not matter even it was shorter than the usual length. This is a pure children's film, that families might as well enjoy it. I thought everything in it was cute. The characters, and the simple story. But the animation obviously was not that great as we see in Hollywood. Also not bad to ignore it completely.This takes place on the planet of the rabbits and tells the story of a young Johan. He's the happiest kid, living with his loving parents, but until one day when the feather king gets his mother. Missing her presence, the desperate Johan in a boat at the sea alone, uses the situation after receiving a sos radio message. He now enters the forbidden land without an invitation and his adventure begins to fight for his mother's return. It also helps him to learn an important lesson that ends with what seems the right way."The feather king took my mom. And I want her back"After seeing this I think the director should get a shot at Hollywood, so that he can come back and make the international quality animated features for his nation. I said that because American production houses usually pour a big amount because of their international market that gets them five to ten times what they have spent. If you are an animation film fan, then you should try this. But you should not compare it with any Hollywood animations. I saw it during the week of Christmas and New Year, the best season to watch such magical tale.I liked how they avoided the word 'loss' or 'death'. You would understand the situation in the story, but the film is not intended to go details. This is the film about losing someone you love and when unable to cope, especially the little kids who can't understand such concept, this film tried to give something fictional version of logic. For that reason alone, it's worth a watch with your little ones. Like the Americans say after someone had died that he/she/it is in a better place, this film set in that place and that's why it was called 'Beyond Beyond' that rhymes with 'Mirror Mirror' kind of fairytale. 6/10

S. Soma Would-be storytellers sometimes make the mistake of thinking that, because the story they are telling is a fairytale and involves magic, that the niceties surrounding "willing suspension of disbelief" may be safely ignored. Important plot elements can then simply be pulled from various bodily orifices, flung at the audience in cheerful disregard and with a brightly smiling face accompanied with jazz hands while shouting "Wow! See?! It's magic!".And so it is with the storyline of "Beyond Beyond". Which is more than simply unfortunate because, in most other respects, "Beyond Beyond" is actually quite good. Well-designed caricatures of characters, good production values, and vivid imagery all combine to make a movie that would have been quite memorable had a decent plot line been a part of the mix. The "moral of the story" punchline at the end read as ridiculous to me because the plot elements it was supposed to flow from were… ridiculous.The context of the story is the life and afterlife of anthropomorphic rabbits. There are only a couple of characters in the story which are not either rabbits or very closely rabbit- related creatures.The characters are engaging, especially the young rabbit-son Johan with his unflagging determination to reunite his family. Johan's mother, for unexplained reasons, has become ill and has been carried off by The Feather King, which is the equivalent of dying in this universe. The Kingdom of the Feather King is, for the purposes of the story, where you go when you die. Johan is having none of this and is going to the Kingdom of the Feather King to retrieve his mother and reunite his family, and he isn't taking no for an answer.Johan's grim determination to get his mother back is the thing that carries the entire film. He tries to be polite and gives adults and those in authority the opportunity, repeatedly, to give a reasonable explanation as to why things should be the way they are, politely listens to what are essentially non-answers, does a quick "Nope, not buying it" turnabout and forges ahead while the adults look on, appalled.There's another character in the story, Bill, who is also one of the few non-rabbit characters. He's as dissatisfied with the status quo as Johan, and goes about doing quite a bit more damage to that status quo. Where Johan is singly focused on retrieving his mother and has no desire to upset any apple carts beyond that one objective, Bill seems determined to rearrange everything in the rabbit- afterlife to suit himself. Bill's character is self-centered, random and rebellious and so, quite predictably, The Kingdom of the Feather King begins to come apart at the seams as the effects of Bill's changes begin to set in.The net result is that everything has to be set back to rights, Bill's changes have to be undone, and Johan has to accept the fact that he can't be with his mother until such time as his own ticket gets punched. Literally. But hey, it's not so bad because Johan can always send his mother letters as messages in bottles cast into the ocean. I kid you not. More reliable than the USPS. We're even given the sense that others are communicating with their loved ones through message bottles as well.The trouble with all of this is that none of it makes any sense.For the purposes of this review, I have barely scratched the surface of the plot line which involves a giant, tentacled creature that normally runs things in the Kingdom of the Feather King and sheds scales which determine who's to die and be collected by The Feather King, phalanxes of rules which must be obeyed without rationale or explanation (or even comprehension, for that matter…), and completely glosses over the fact that the very presence of Bill in The Kingdom of the Feather King fundamentally contravenes the rules all by itself (how was he in there without his ticket being canceled in the first place, and why did he need a ticket now to go back there and how did he get such a pivotal role in the creation and maintenance of The Kingdom without having apparently died to get there in the first place, etc.). The plot is arbitrary, complex, and full of elements that don't need to be there.None of it makes any sense, none of it hangs together, the rules appear arbitrary (especially when every question that gets asked basically only gets "just because" for an answer) and so on. One completely empathizes with Johan and his blanket rebellion against the "order of things" because no one in their right mind would accept any of this nonsense, ESPECIALLY when the rules give a sense of simply being made up for no particular reason other than to portray an absurdly complex structure to the afterlife. Supporting the desire to rebel is the fact that everybody dwelling in the afterlife seems to just stand around, unhappy and bored. As irresponsible and destructive as Bill is, one has to emphasize with his motivations even if his very existence makes no sense at all. Write down the plot elements to the next fever-induced nightmare you have and I guarantee it'll make more sense than this does.Because of all this, the moral you actually derive from the story is, "Life and death makes no sense at all, it's horrific and sad AND boring. But tough nuts to you. Follow the rules and like it."Personally, while I can enthusiastically recommend the movie to be enjoyed for its production values and imagery, as long as you go in with eyes open and knowing that the story is a complete loss, I would certainly never recommend letting any sort of a child see this picture because NOTHING in it makes for any sort of impression I would like a kid to have.