ThedevilChoose When a movie has you begging for it to end not even half way through it's pure crap. We've all seen this movie and this characters millions of times, nothing new in it. Don't waste your time.

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Billie Morin This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows

Sanjeev Waters A movie that not only functions as a solid scarefest but a razor-sharp satire.

LeonLouisRicci One of the best Westerns is unfortunately little known outside Film-Noir devotees and Robert Mitchum Fans. It is a darkly lit antithesis to most familiar Westerns of broad sun drenched landscapes and other clichés of the Genre. A brooding Character Study that anticipated the Mann/Boetticher personal Films of the 1950's.This is one of the very few Westerns that can be placed in the Film-Noir Category without dissent. From the conflicted and sensitive Anti-Hero to the moody, gloomy shadows that drape almost every Scene, to the brutal and very violent brawl that takes place in a dingy Commissary, to the changing attitudes of the Players, this is definitely a Noir without apology.The fine Acting, Cinematography, and Direction makes this stand out as a thoughtful, complex situation of Range Wars and Social alignments. A unique Movie that is mounted in a claustrophobic frame that goes against the grain of its setting. A sharply focused, but mysterious environment with Drifters and Cowgirls equally important to the Story.

bkoganbing The novels of Luke Short paint a dark picture of the old west and Hollywood has made good use of them in making some really good westerns. Blood On The Moon is one of the best screen adaptations of one of his stories. A quick cursory glance of the films made from his stories, Ramrod, Ambush, Station West, Vengeance Valley, Coroner Creek all of them are pretty dark, almost noir like stories set in the old west. Blood On The Moon has Robert Mitchum as a cowboy sent for by his friend Robert Preston to be part of scheme to grab the herd of cattle baron Tom Tully. Not that Preston wants to do a little honest rustling, no his is a complicated plan involving getting the small ranchers and homesteaders riled up against Tully and getting a small range war started. He's even seduced one of Tully's daughters, Phyllis Thaxter, into betraying her father with promises of love and undying affection.All of this is a bit too much for Mitchum for whom it is alluded was quite the hellraiser in earlier times, but now is just sick of it all. Tully's other daughter Barbara Bel Geddes is checking him out if he would only break with Preston.When discussing this film in his book about Robert Mitchum, Lee Server makes the point that this film was far from what RKO planned for its star. Originally Mitchum was to be the white hat cowboy hero and successor as its B picture western star when Tim Holt went off to World War II. Little did they dream at RKO back in 1944 when Mitchum made his first with top billing, Nevada that he would be in this kind of western and do it so successfully.Preston had finished with his contract at Paramount and was now freelancing. We now know him primarily for The Music Man, but in his early film days he played many a villain and this one is a study in malevolence. His superficial charm even carries menace with it.Blood On The Moon enters that list of really top notch westerns that were originally authored by Luke Short. Try not to miss it when broadcast.

chaos-rampant You can see the film noir lurking behind the western in this western noir in the first plot twist. Behind the facade of a typical western conflict between cattle owners and homesteaders lies a distinctly noirish crime setup, "the big con", and yet it's exactly that kind of inconistency that prevents BLOOD ON THE MOON from reaching the greatness parts of it faintly suggest. Because the conflict foreshadowed in the first act between cattle baron (usually the bad guy in a western) and the conniving leader of the homesteaders is abandoned in the third act so Robert Mitchum's drifter character can hole up in Walter Brennan's shack and exchange shots with the hired guns of his former employer. Because the perenial world-weariness of Mitchum's droopy face is undercut by a Hollywood ending where everything is tied up neatly with a ribbon on top. We're still in good guys/bad guys territory and director Robert Wise opens his cards about who's what way too early, so that the rest of the film and the promise of the good first 30 minutes is squandered in people running hither and thither, to do this or that or prevent those from happening. Gorgeously photographed and watchable throughout, but more of a missed chance than the bonafide western noir classic it should have been.

wernrgr8 Blood on the Moon is indeed, a black and white picture that is actually a"noir" western of late 40,s type. It contains a good story ,humour ,romance,action ,and very good acting.There are many dark scenes that would make the colorization process hideous at best. I think with it's sharp contrasts it would be nice on DVD for use on big screens. Great Cast! great dialog! One of my favorites!The characters come alive and you can't help but getting engrossed in the story. It comes from a Luke Short novel of which I've read many,beats the spurs of the newer 70,s. No "B" western , this one.No painted scenery like Bonanza.