Exoticalot People are voting emotionally.

ChampDavSlim The acting is good, and the firecracker script has some excellent ideas.

Casey Duggan It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

Cassandra Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.

TheLittleSongbird Okay, Bloodsuckers is not a good or great movie, or at least to me. If anything I found it decent and reasonably entertaining, especially compared to other low-budget movies I've seen recently. Bloodsuckers does actually have some note-worthy performances, Joe Lando, who was the best and only good thing about Meteor Apocalypse, is decent, Michael Ironside while underused does a nice job as the villain and Natassia Malthe, complete with a wardrobe that completely flatters her figure, is incredibly sexy and not too bad acting-wise either. The story is also an improvement, true it is predictable and not exactly original(apart from the interesting angle of vampire mind sex) but unlike most other low-budget movies I've recently seen it's actually engaging too, and I say the same thing about the action scenes and the gore. Where Bloodsuckers does fall down is with the rest of the cast aren't as good, either bland or irritating(Leanne Adachi manages to be both those things), the script is of rather cheesy quality, the human characters are stereotypical and not all of them are easy to identify with and the cheap effects for the vampires(who themselves as a whole lacked charisma and menace mostly). Overall, reasonably entertaining but one with many flaws. 5/10 Bethany Cox

Boba_Fett1138 Vampire hunters in space! Doesn't that sound awesome? Sure it does but that doesn't mean that this is an awesome movie as well.This is a movie from the days that vampires were suddenly cool again and the movie borrows a lot from the style of the "Blade" movies, that were flashy, fast and action filled. This movie tries to be like that as well, as well as with its characters but it of course is lacking the right budget and talents involved for that, so the movie more often feels as a lame one.But really, as far as these low budget B-movie type of science-fiction flicks go, this one is not amongst the worst of them. It's still pretty good looking and the movie simply doesn't ever become a horrible one. Bad, yes! But definitely not horrible. Not that I'll ever watch this movie again but I at least didn't feel like I was completely wasting my time with it.I still did wish for the movie to do something more with its concept though. For a movie that is about vampire hunters in space, there is a disappointing amount of vampire hunting going on. So please, if you are expecting lots of awesome vampire action, then think again.But all of this could be blamed on its story. Or well, perhaps its storytelling, since the movie doesn't seem to be very interested in telling its story. Things just happen, without going anywhere with it. It feels really messy at times and I often kept wondering what it's main plot line was actually supposed to be all about.I also seriously thought that this movie was based on a TV-series of perhaps was part of a movie series, since this actual movie does very little about its character setup and building or providing any background information to its story. But as far as I can tell, this movie is based- or part of nothing, so it's a complete standalone movie, which makes it odd that it behaves itself as if everybody should be familiar with the characters already and the far off alien worlds it is taking placing at. It really does a lot of things wrong. It has Michael Ironside as, supposedly, the main villain but he gets introduced half way through the movie and actually is also very little in the movie at all. It's storytelling and character handling like this that still makes this a pretty bad movie to watch, most of the time.It's not the worst genre example but there still is no good reason why you should ever watch this.5/10 http://bobafett1138.blogspot.com/

Claudio Carvalho In 2210, mankind has explored the space and found a vampiric menace, declaring war against different breeds of vampires some of them inclusive human flesh cannibals. The V-SAN (aka Vampire Sanitation) spaceship leaded by Captain Churchill (Joe Lando) receives a distress call from an Earth base and his team formed by the vampire Quintana (Natassia Malthe), the rookie officer Damian (Dominic Zamprogna) and the rebels Rosa (Leanne Adachi) and Roman (Aaron Pearl) seek survivors and vampires and they rescue the scientist Fiona (A.J. Cook), but Capt. Churchill is captured by the vampires. After their next assignment, the provisional captain Damian and his group disclose that a traitor has disengaged the defense system of the bases and they chase their prime suspect.I like B-movies, but "Bloodsuckers" has very contradictory characters and situations. The story has some potential but the internal fights and argues and contradictions of the V-SAN team have irritated me. The so-called vampires are actually cannibals and have nothing to do with the traditional vampires that suck blood and fear garlic, crosses, holy water and sunlight. The worm vampire is hilarious and one of the funniest moments of this flick. Natassia Malthe recalls Catherine Zeta-Jones and is also extremely gorgeous. This movie seems to be a forgettable television pilot of a series. My vote is five.Title (Brazil): "A Guerra dos Vampiros" ("The War of the Vampires")

donaldhurst It's interesting to note, in the light recent movies,that the fight to save humanity is led by a male. This said, I particularly enjoyed the character of the vampire fighting on the side of humans-One of thr problems for this movie is the plethora of high budget films with all the effects money can buy. Having said all of this I thoroughly enjoyed the movie. Part of it is the "absence" of over-whelming special effects and part it is the memories of my own days of hunting vampires. (Grew upon a farm with lots of bats.) I would certainly recommmend this movie to anyone who enjoys this genre and can accept it for what it is-low budget and all.