Linbeymusol
Wonderful character development!
Inclubabu
Plot so thin, it passes unnoticed.
Comwayon
A Disappointing Continuation
Rio Hayward
All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
guszak
This was as bad as anything I have ever watched. Forget the terrible acting or the fact that the actress playing Bonnie had an accent that has never been heard at anytime, anywhere in the world. The "historical" events depicted here were pure fiction and ludicrous I am fascinated by the bank robber era of the 1930s, one of the most interesting periods in American history, but geez, who wrote this, a 7th grader? And I am a big fan of Emil Hirsch, a great actor, but he is miscast here and less than convincing as Clyde. I know this was a made for TV production, but that does not excuse it for being so bad.
fidraisle-1
This is another of those films that gets a "1" only because it's not possible to give it a "0". Normally, I am critical of a film if it is meant to be historic and the costuming fails abysmally. This is not true in this case. If there is one thing that could be praised, it would be the very well done costuming. But sadly, like another "historical" series ("Outlander") though the costuming is brilliant, the story line is absolute rubbish. The story of Bonnie and Clyde is fascinating enough without the voice-over, the pure fantasy story that was woven through this. I tried about three different times to watch this (thank goodness for Netflix) and I gave up. The 1967 version with Warren Beatty and Faye Dunaway was not good, but it was far, far better than this nonsense.
james-wiley
The chronological history of this movie is totally wrecked. The absence of two key criminal partners diminished the authenticity and flavor of the real B&C. W.D. Jones who was a paramour for several years and he was replaced with Henry Methvin. The chronological order was totally misplaced. B&C started their infamous joyride with WD Jones a 16 year old who yearned for adventure and of course sex. Frank Hammer, Texas Ranger, did not get involved until after Clyde raided Huntsville Prison in Texas. Get the facts and see the history at http://texashideout.tripod.com/bc.htm.All total, Clyde & Co. murdered 12 police officers and kidnap numerous persons. Clyde was 5 feet, 4 inches tall. He was a runt punk and Bonnie was 4 feet, 9 inches. They had the appearance of children but Oh so deadly.
colonel52
Spoilers not much but some. I don't see where to give it star rating, so will just say.I give it a 9 out of 10.I did not think this would be good , but it was. The actress who played Bonnie " Holliday Grainger " did a outstanding job with the role. She brought Bonnie to life in a compelling manner. I would have to say she was the star of the film. All the actors did a good job, and the directing was good too. The story although fictional at times was a good story.The ending is one you would never think of, but I have to say is very possible, considering that at the point of the Ambush Clyde did not have much to live for, and had said he would never go back to prison. The film indicates that Clyde set up and drove into the ambush on purpose. This is original and possible.I enjoyed watching this, and I think it is better and more factual than the 1967 W.Beatty movie. The film does portray Bonnie as a fame seeker, and active in shooting people, which goes against historical accounts.They use the false story of Bonnie shooting a cop on the ground , and saying "his head bounced like a rubber ball" a gang member who was there said this was not true, but at the time this story was used to get the public to not like Bonnie and Clyde, and it worked. So if you get a chance watch this , it is a good film.