Matcollis This Movie Can Only Be Described With One Word.

Pluskylang Great Film overall

Bluebell Alcock Ok... Let's be honest. It cannot be the best movie but is quite enjoyable. The movie has the potential to develop a great plot for future movies

Phillida Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

Andres Salama One of Director Otar Iosseliani's stronger films. The movie takes place during several periods of time in his native country of Georgia: in the Middle Ages, in the early 1900s, during the Stalinist period (the bulk of the movie) and in the chaos of the early 1990s. The same actors often play different characters at the different periods of time (for example, the guy playing the medieval king also plays a Stalinist henchman and a contemporary smuggler). The movie works through vignettes full of deadpan humor, and a common thread of all the stories seems to be the absurdity of life, the arrogance of power and man's inhumanity to man. Iosseliani even plays a couple of roles here, as a Stalinist torturer, and as a present day bumbling projectionist, in one of the film's most elaborate gags. Overall, a great movie, with Iosseliani's caustic humor telling us, as the old Latin proverb said, that homo homini lupus, man is a wolf to man.

Cristi_Ciopron What are the features of Iosseliani's cinema?It is so savory,so fresh,so intelligent,so original,ironic,unconventional, inspiring.The Carnivalesque and conventional barbarity of the medieval scenes is strongly contrasted with the cold cruelty of those settled during the Communist epoch.Brigands, Chapitre VII (1996)'s theme is a historical one:the Communism 's atrocities are keenly investigated.The conception is a phenomenological one:it shows the facts in themselves.The content's treatment is calligraphic,and of a wonderful transparency.Each frame is minutely composed,and almost any scene has a joke or a gag.There is no lumber.Despite its relatively big length,the show excels in in concision and its narration is lapidary,succinct,elliptical.Otar Iosseliani's gusto,and the make-up's economy,are delightful;he uses a refined photography and chromatic.In a playful and funny note,that only serves his fundamental sobriety and propriety,Otar Iosseliani is caustic,sarcastic, incisive,clever.The scent of the torture tools;a schoolboy's denunciations include his father and his teacher.The jail,then the lock-up,the dead's stretcher, the death's corridors,swallow step by step everybody.The terrorist system devours itself,but its reserves ,its resources are huge.An executioner drinks water from his palm's dipper sullied with his victim 's blood.The segments about the Communist world are rending,in their concision.The stretchers are covered by shrouds.The executioner's son is invited to watch his father's trade,from behind a screen;when the boy goes out in the street,he describes enraptured to his mother the methods he saw.His father is a tall man,with long,expressive,nimble hands.The unbelievable violence of the Communism ,the absurd of a civil war nowadays,are graphically presented.There is an in-exhausted artistic plenitude in this movie that expounds the Communism's wickedness,corruption, dishonesty,ill nature;unlike other anti-Communist shows,this one does not scoff at the collectivism's folly and very low human level.It grasps its devilish,cruel,measureless wrong-doing.This stripping of the accessory,this appeal to the comic's categories strengthen the impression of meaningful realism.Caustic and sardonic realism:of the historical content,of the themes,of the facts;the freshness of the approach,the striking gist of the story.The tact excludes all exaggeration.Iosseliani has much to say,and Brigands, Chapitre VII (1996) is never an empty,formal exercise.

a_drew_k i suppose the trick while watching Ioseliani's movies is to take them just as they are. trying to conceptualize them as less as possible. movie figure out the ideas himself while head is tranquil and mind is open. the colors, the visual series seems to be rather not less important then the plot gimmicks and characters. and all together it's a very special flow if perception. personally i enjoyed it a lot. i really liked his way of seeing.

Grégoire "Freak" Dubost if i hadn't seen his Otar Iosseliani's next film, 1999's masterpiece "Adieu, Plancher des vaches !". So my comment will probably be linked to the two films rather than only to this particularly strange journey, adrift in a Parisian's tramp mind. War is the main thread that links his dreams, as he embodies a medieval king, or a communist leader, or remembers of his east-european country, ravaged by war. But more interesting is the permanent obsession, for Iosseliani, of typical features like Cinema in itself, Paris, where the director actually lives (he's from Georgia), tramps, alcohol and songs. The scenes which I think are 'real' in opposition to 'dreamt' ones, mainly show the hero, with his unfortunate friends, but still happy singing beautiful harmonies. Just like the last scene (and others) from "Adieu,..". It is a bit difficult to follow the plot, since there are so many different ages edited together, but as the very first sequence shows us, this is only Cinema. So just let your mind wander with the pictures.