SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

Protraph Lack of good storyline.

ClassyWas Excellent, smart action film.

XoWizIama Excellent adaptation.

blanche-2 Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and Anthony Bushell are the Prescott brothers in 1931's "Chances," and both are in love with the same woman, Molly (Rose Hobart). The two brothers go off to war while Molly does her part in the effort, Tom (Bushell) believing that Rose is waiting for him, while in fact, she loves Jack (Fairbanks Jr.) and only turned to Tom on the rebound. Jack and Molly meet while he is on leave, and when he returns to battle, he doesn't know how to handle the situation with his brother.This is a very dated film done in that weird time that was the transition between silent and sound. This makes the dialogue pacing off and the film seem mannered and stagy. It's by no means a heavy look at war as some of the films made around the same time were, but rather focuses on the brothers' relationship and their mutual love for one woman. Fairbanks Jr. emerges as the best actor, giving a solid performance. Hobart is very serious and kind of boring, and Bushell is good-looking but callow. It's all very stiff upper lip and pip-pip."Chances" is a dark-looking film with some well-done battle scenes. One interesting bit of trivia about the cast is that all three leads lived to be 90 and above. One wonders if in later years, they even remembered this early effort.

bkoganbing We're so far removed at this point from the generation during an after World War I that a film like Chances is almost incomprehensible today. Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Anthony Bushell are the Ingleside brothers and both are soldiers, officers and gentlemen in the best British stiff upper lip tradition.Anthony Bushell is in love with a childhood friend played by Rose Hobart and Fairbanks likes to play the field. Problem is that Hobart's decided she's got eyes only for Fairbanks and then Fairbanks realizes what's been blooming in his back yard. If you're a fan of these kind of romantic films and knowing that the background is World War I, you know that the issue will be settled on the battlefield.I don't like panning these kind of films because they do reflect their times and are done with great sincerity. The battle scenes are very nicely done by Warner Brothers. Nevertheless I'm not sure how today's audiences would take to something like this.But I will say that Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. does show in abundance the style and charm that made him a star. It wasn't just on his famous father's name that he stayed a star.

tonstant viewer This film is a weird hybrid of silent film and stage play, but it never quite manages to be a movie.The battle scenes are impressively cinematic, well-staged and photographed in the D.W. Griffith mold, but what comes between them is very uneven.The British accents come and go and the acting is stagy. Douglas Fairbanks Jr. is engaging as a rake at the beginning but can't encompass the deeper emotions towards the end. Rose Hobart is much better at playing resentment and bitterness than romance, which is my guess why she slid from lead to character woman so quickly. Anthony Bushell is a wet noodle as the stolid brother, which is probably right, but no fun to watch.And what was this project doing at First National (Warners) anyway? Paramount or MGM could function well with a bunch of rowdy English aristocrats at play, but they might as well be moon-men to the studio home of Jimmy Cagney and Edward G. A tommy-gun or malicious half-grapefruit would have helped this film immensely.So, interesting as an awkward curio, but constipated compared to the great silent WWI films like The Big Parade or What Price Glory? and clumsy compared to the great talkies that would accompany WWII.

drednm Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. is very good in this romance/war film, playing a man who loves his brother's fiancee. Good cinematography helps put a gossamer glow on this early talkie that also boasts good work by Rose Hobart and Anthony Bushell. It never gets sticky but still manages to show moving relationships between brothers and between Fairbanks (always underrated) and Hobart, who unaccountably sank quickly to second leads. The story may seem a tad dated now, but this old film is definitely worth a look. Mary Forbes is the mother, and I think Ethel Griffies plays the drunken flower seller.