Smartorhypo Highly Overrated But Still Good

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Janae Milner Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

Ella-May O'Brien Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.

Reanna Keller I will at least say this is one of the better sequels that has came out of the series. It is watchable, it was just not my favorite one.Issac makes his return and the story somewhat focuses on him. I think he could have had a better part in it. 19 years after the first one, he has a child who is supposed to be the main guy but the title goes to Gabriel.The man who plays Gabriel does a fantastic job of being "He who walks behind the rows". He plays the character well and I think that is one of the better parts of the movie.It does link back to the first one, Rachel (Who was the one who helped Amos pass on). I just wish things would have been a little different and I think the plot with the recurring characters is just too much.

Stephen Goldberg I've watched all of the Children of the Corn films leading up to this one and enjoyed them all on different levels. Some good and some so bad they're good, but all entertaining. A lot of the latter direct to DVD films in this series all consistently have great cinematography and this one is no different. Other highlights include the titular, Isaac's return. This was a nice call back as it's always nice to have a villain in a horror franchise rather than just a consistent theme, as the Children of the Corn films do. There is also a nice twist that you don't see coming, or at least I didn't see coming in this film and not everything is explained. Which is something more films should do. If you don't have a good explanation sometimes it's best to not say anything, a viewer's imagination is probably going to add more to your film than a weak story.

Whitetygrr Honestly until I recently signed up for Netflix I was unaware of how many of these movies existed! I knew there was the first one which I had seen and it was OK. Though truthfully isaacs voice was quite annoying, perhaps that's part of the horror. Anyway I have been watching them for free of course late at night a couple of them put me to sleep and now I am up to this one. Have yet to see however many more are after this one. Well this certainly not the best movie. A bit confusing at parts but that may be because I was not fully interested. In fact I had to stop and resume a couple times. I did make one observation about Isaac though. He just woke from a 19 year coma or whatever...despite being killed...yet correct me if I'm wrong but in the beginning of the move when he is just waking up is he not wearing contacts? Seems as though if you had been out of it for almost two decades you won't be wearing contact lenses!

Michael_Elliott Children of the Corn 666 (1999) ** (out of 4)The sixth film in the series is a mildly entertaining if rather needless direct sequel to the first film. This time out a young girl (Natalie Ramsey) goes back to Gatlin to try and find out who her real mother is. Once there she awakens Isaac (John Franklin), the original film's leader of the children. Soon he is back preaching his religious stuff with hopes of passing it on to his son. If you've seen the original film then you know it's impossible for Issac to be in a coma here let alone have the possibility of coming back to life but this is a horror series so you'll just have to put that out of your mind. I thought the first half of this movie was rather slow without too many good things going on but the final half really picks up and makes for a mildly interesting film. The story is pretty much what we've seen in the previous films with a group of religious nuts spitting out gospel but this time there seems to be something a tad bit deeper in their motives. A few minor changes makes for an entertaining second half that includes a rather exciting ending. Ramsey does a pretty good job in the lead role and Franklin doesn't miss a beat in stepping back into the role he last did fifteen years earlier. Stacy Keach is good in a thankless role as a doctor and Nancy Allen is on hand looking better than ever. The two are in here for their name value but both are good. The special effects are a tad bit better than average as is the editing and various other technical things. The music score is also a step up but the killings are all rather bland with the exception being a suicide that happens towards the end. I doubt fans of the first film are going to jump all over this "conclusion" since there are many unanswered question or facts that are overlooked.