SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.

StyleSk8r At first rather annoying in its heavy emphasis on reenactments, this movie ultimately proves fascinating, simply because the complicated, highly dramatic tale it tells still almost defies belief.

Hattie I didn’t really have many expectations going into the movie (good or bad), but I actually really enjoyed it. I really liked the characters and the banter between them.

Phillida Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.

drednm Sad pre-Code film about adultery and its effects on the people involved has Ronald Colman starring as a British barrister happily married to Kay Francis. She goes off to Italy to save her silly sister from getting involved with the wrong man. Ironically, that leaves Colman easy prey for a conniving shop girl (Phyllis Barry) he meets by chance.Although she knows he's married and nothing can come of their affair, she relentlessly pursues him and he falls for her. She loses her job and becomes totally dependent on him. He tries to break if off just as Francis returns from Italy but with tragic results.Colman is excellent as the intelligent man who falls prey to temptation. Francis is wonderful as the wounded wife, and Barry is good as the conniving Doris. Co-stars include Henry Stephenson as the randy friend who starts all the trouble, Florine McKinney as Garla the silly sister, Viva Tattersall as Millie, Paul Porcasi as the restaurant owner, Halliwell Hobbes as the official, and Elspeth Dudgeon as Mrs. Weeks.There's also a clip from a Charlie Chaplin movie.

MartinHafer Despite the fact that the film stars the ever erudite Ronald Colman, there just isn't much to recommend this bizarre Pre-Code melodrama. Much of it is because the message is muddled, inconsistent and bizarre...and the characters are completely unlikable.Colman plays a very well-respected barrister who has every reason to be happy. And, he loves his wife and tells her and everyone else how lucky he is. Because of this, what follows really makes no sense. At the insistence of his 'friend' (Henry Stephenson in a VERY atypical sort of role for him), Colman takes one stupid step after another and is headed for an affair. Again and again, Colman says 'no'--and only seconds later, does exactly what this young lady wants. Now here is the weird part--although he spends time with the lady, tells her he loves her and kisses her, no sort of sexual relationship is even implied!! So, we are expected to believe he is now cheating on his wife BUT doesn't want to sleep with the lady! Huh?!? The young lady turns out to be a bit flaky. Although he insists repeatedly that he loves his wife and won't leave her, she persists in pushing him to do exactly this. Now considering that Colman plays a real wienie who always caves in, you can understand her expectations. But, when he continues to refuse to leave his wife, she responds by killing herself and the film tries very hard to make you feel sorry for Colman--who just seems like a giant idiot and an unlikable one at that.So what is the point of the film? Should you have lots of affairs ONLY just be certain the ladies involved are non-suicidal? Is adultery okay as long as you don't 'do the nasty'? Can the audience care about a man's predicament when he creates it himself, is awfully unlikable and a dope? All I know is that I just didn't give a rat's behind for him or the story. A weird combination of Pre-Code morality and prudishness. Clearly one of Colman's worst films.

kidboots When Lubitsch ran over schedule on "Trouble in Paradise" Kay Francis was replaced by Bebe Daniels in "42nd Street", a movie that she thought could re-vitalise her career. Kay was understandably angry and to appease their star, Warners lent her to Samuel Goldwyn for his prestigious "Cynara" where all the actors came out winners. I thought Ronald Colman and Kay Francis had good chemistry as the contented couple who encounter the seven year itch.Jim Warlock (Colman) has the evening all planned - dinner at the Ritz, followed by a show with his beautiful wife Clemency (Francis) as it is their 7th wedding anniversary. He gets home to find Clemency leaving for Naples, all part of a scheme to get her flighty sister unentangled from yet another sticky engagement. His fun loving friend takes him out to a low restaurant where they pick up a couple of shop girls. Doris (Phyllis Barry) seems particularly taken with Jim but he doesn't give her a second thought, even tearing up her address as he declares there is only one woman for him - Clemency!! There was much fanfare when Phyllis Barry, an unknown, was chosen for the role of Doris, but, for me, she didn't seem to have any spark, being pretty colourless in the role. It wasn't surprising that within a couple of years her roles consisted of things like "party guest" and "brunette chambermaid" when she wasn't being put into Wheeler and Woolsley comedies.He encounters the intense young Doris again, at a beauty contest he is judging and of course she wins first prize. They begin meeting but Jim's steadfastness and integrity count for nothing when he finds himself at the mercy of the needy Doris. In only one scene in the movie, when Doris and Jim visit a cinema. Watching Charlie Chaplin in "A Dog's Life", Jim really lets his guard down and for a few minutes the viewer can see why he is drawn to the unpretentious Doris. Clemency returns and Jim hastily pens a "Dear John" letter to Doris not realising that it will push her over the brink. His friend dismisses Doris as someone who "didn't play the game fair" but because of his decency about not letting on that she wasn't quite pure when they met, Jim gets caught up in the whole sordid mess.Kay didn't have much to do in this drama of infidelity except look her usual ravishing self. Unfortunately even though by the end of 1932 she was one of the most "worshipped of stars" it proved to be the end of her prestigious years.

bobthepoet-1 From the part where Henry Stepehnson's character says "Women hope marriage will change a man, men hope it won't, both are disappointed" to the inquest scene, this is a pre-coderthis is a pre-coder with some good insights into the marriage game. The inquest scene I found rather over the top. If it was to be done, it should of been done as a dream sequence. Ronald Colman would of been ruined anyhow, due to his indiscretion. At the final scene, right before the re-emergence of Henry Stephenson, when it seems assured Ronald Colman, will leave, in disgrace, alone, my wife, yelled involuntarily at Kay Francis, "you fool".We watched this because I am a devout Kay Francis fan who is humoured. Though this really wasn't a real Kay movie, except for the suffering, it is well worth your time, keeping in mind that it has the virtues and warts of that time.Lastly, a movie inspired by one line of a Poem?