MoPoshy Absolutely brilliant

Janae Milner Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.

Casey Duggan It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

Brenda The plot isn't so bad, but the pace of storytelling is too slow which makes people bored. Certain moments are so obvious and unnecessary for the main plot. I would've fast-forwarded those moments if it was an online streaming. The ending looks like implying a sequel, not sure if this movie will get one

adonis98-743-186503 A musical re-imagining of the 1987 film, Dirty Dancing (1987). Dirty Dancing is one of my favorite Patrick Swayze films and this TV movie remake has none of that excitement or the magic of the original in general, hell even Dirty Dancing 2 was better than this and at least Swayze was still alive and even had a small cameo that was pretty fun. This film uses the same music but it doesn't use that same fire or that same energy as the original and even the casting is all wrong and don't get me wrong Abigail Breslin is a great actress and she has proved that with movies like Maggie and Signs but she is no Jennifer Grey and that other guy is no freaking Patrick Swayze in any shape or form at all. (0/10)

fuller-lucy I do not even know where to start with this. I am genuinely still in a mix of disgust and shock that they have desecrated dirty dancing with this appalling knock off. I just do not understand why they have not only completely altered the story line but also cast it terribly. I find it hilarious that they cast casper smart in a non dancing role when he is such an amazing dancer and I really cannot believe they cast abigail breslin as baby. Abigail was clearly too large for the role and lifts and couldn't dance throughout even after 'being taught' by an unworthy and awful acted johnny. I also cant understand the musical aspect of it or why they tried to 'make it stand out from the original' by completely changing the plot so it was unrecognizable. The whole point of remaking dirty dancing is so that we can not only reminisce when we watch it of the amazing original but we can also experience the revamping of an old classic with a new and current casting, none of which were even remotely done. They should have also stuck to the original soundtrack and not created their own version so that it not only sounded awful but it disgraced the classic songs we remember fondly. I am angry that I have watched it as it will now pop into my head each time I watch the actual dirty dancing film but its only good quality is it really does make the original look and be even better if thats even possible. I think the people behind this failure should be ashamed and disgusted at what they have done.

optimumlaser I would rather watch the remake of Ghost Busters 137 times than have to watch 15 more minutes of this garbage. Baby is supposed to be attractive, she's not called baby because she hasn't lost her baby weight yet. Baby was not supposed to be a millennial feminist. And why did they make her 18? We all know that no one in Hollywood cares about age. Jennifer Grey even turned down a part because of how horrible it was. I'm surprised this has 3.1 stars, it should be hovering just above zero. The pandering was over the top. Nobody puts baby in the corner (she wasn't even in a corner in the movie) mainly because she wouldn't fit.

browser123 Terrible remake. Bad acting and the person who did casting should be hung! At least Jennifer Grey was thin and attractive in a way. Baby was mediocre at best and chunky. Not a good choice for the character. Patrick Swayze would not be happy with his replacement either! If you are going to do a remake, use characters that compliment the originals, not desecrate them! If there was a 0, I would have rated it that. Would not recommend this movie to anyone!