Karry Best movie of this year hands down!

SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

TaryBiggBall It was OK. I don't see why everyone loves it so much. It wasn't very smart or deep or well-directed.

Raymond Sierra The film may be flawed, but its message is not.

mark.waltz By the end of the 1940's, the 20 year series of "Charlie Chan" was beginning to look its age, even if Chan had plastic surgery twice with the replacement of two actors from its originator, Warner Oland. Roland Winters, the weakest of the three actors to play Charlie during this time, was mighty bland, and most of the scripts followed convoluted plots which at times needed a map to figure out, clues thrown in at the last minute to throw the viewer off. Here, the plot line follows a poisoned gas invented by Harry Hayden who makes threats against the men who purchased the invention for use against America's enemies. After Hayden makes threats, murder occurs, and of course Hayden is the top suspect. Chan happens to be in New Orleans when this happens and gets involved in the case, number two son Victor Sen Young tagging along and putting his foot not only in the case but in his mouth too with his interference.This is probably the most straight forward of the plots of the last few years of the series, taken over from Monogram in the mid 1940's with reduced budgets and sometimes outrageous plot devices. There's a few of those developments here, but for the most part, it is on the level and overall more interesting than the remainder of the Monogram years. Still, there's a feeling that the series was long out of steam, and a sense of desperation being felt. Mantan Moreland is aboard as usual with his string of malapropisms and offers some amusement as he teams with Sen Young in getting the two into constant trouble.

utgard14 Charlie Chan (Roland Winters) is asked by one of the owners of a chemical plant to investigate the murders of some of his co-owners. The guy is worried he's next. At least, I think that's what the plot was about as it was convoluted and the movie was so dull I stopped caring early on.Winters is absolutely terrible as Chan. I can't stress this enough. I hate everything about his performance. I especially hate how he delivers lines ("How long you have..uh...been...uh..shaking hands with trouble?"). There is nothing likable or appealing about Roland Winters performance in any of his Chan films. Mantan Moreland is in this as Birmingham Brown. The less said about him the better. Victor Sen Yung is Tommy Chan. Why they messed with the names I don't know but for all of the Toler Chan films he appeared in, Sen Yung played "Number Two Son" Jimmy. Benson Fong played "Number Three Son" Tommy, a totally different son. But when Winters took over the role of Chan, they kept Sen Yung on but changed his name from Jimmy to Tommy, even though he's still referred to as "Number Two Son!" Just another example of the shoddy writing and production at Monogram. This is an exceptionally boring Chan film. Attractive Carol Forman is about the only thing worth recommending about this one.

tedg This could be considered yet another manufactured episode in a tired series.But the Chan things had some pretty clever writers, so far as plot devices.One thing that made them dull was that you were introduced to the crooks early in the game; the battle of wits was boring. Here, the crooks you are introduced to are not the only ones and are being manipulated themselves. Sure, there is the pretty woman who is part of the gang and who gets cheated...But I would like to point out a rather remarkable plot point. The plot requires that a glass container of poison gas be released. This container can be planted ahead of time and triggered remotely. As it happens, the trigger involves a radio.Now common sense in the real world would have this glass vial be secreted in some convenient place, easy to place and remain hidden. But the story here has this vial in the form of a radio tube placed in the radio. The reason is that viewers would make the radio- gas connection better. In other words, it is a concession to cinematic storytelling even though it makes no sense, no sense at all if you think about it. But it makes absolute sense when presented. Smart writing.Those Chinese!Ted's Evaluation -- 2 of 3: Has some interesting elements.

mlraymond Docks of New Orleans has one scene that makes the whole movie worth watching. Number Two Son Tommy Chan and chauffeur Birmingham Brown decide to play a duet of ' that old Chop Suey Boogie', with Tommy on violin and Birmingham on piano. The look on Charlie Chan's face as he hears the off key tune from another room, while trying to solve the murder mystery, is priceless.Spoilers ahead: The clever ending, with a captive Charlie Chan tricking the bad guys into believing they have been trapped in a room filled with odorless poison gas, is quite amusing. Roland Winters brought a very low key wit to his portrayal of Chan, which serves the character well; as Charlie frequently reacts to the outrageous events around him with one raised eyebrow and an air of humorous resignation at the idiocy he must contend with, from both dopey policemen and his enthusiastic assistants. This is one of the lesser films in the long running series, but fun for Charlie Chan devotees.