NekoHomey
Purely Joyful Movie!
Borgarkeri
A bit overrated, but still an amazing film
Senteur
As somebody who had not heard any of this before, it became a curious phenomenon to sit and watch a film and slowly have the realities begin to click into place.
Ava-Grace Willis
Story: It's very simple but honestly that is fine.
hellsbo
Yes.. the CGI is pretty poor and the stagery ditto, but I like the plot-twists to the usual told story of the evil Dracula and the effort of telling a lovestory instead - of a monster with a longing human heart (Beauty and the Beast-like). And though I'm not impressed by the general acting performance, Luke Roberts (Dracula) is an exception. Styling him perfectly like a Castlevania character and Roberts' downplayed expressions - and sudden emotional explosions - makes the character very interesting. His almost aristocratic facial features certainly doesn't hurt. The Fiennes-brothers would have been a good choice too - especially Joseph. All in all a decent watch.
Trish K Kotiah
I am really shocked at all the bad reviews for this movie. This is by far the best version of Dracula I have seen. And I pretty much enjoy them all. Granted Jon Voight wasn't the best Van Helsing and I agree about the cheap CGI. In those days it really was all about God and Christianity which is why I think this unexplored version to be the best retelling. It has all the elements for a classic. I liked seeing Dracula as a blond. The actor was amazing! He is everything we would come to expect from Dracula. He makes this movie awesome. I love the twists in the plot. In my humble opinion this is every vampire lovers must see movie.
kosturistika
Dracula has that power to heal wrath(i mean Lich king)even he repaired the broken armor chest, the thing about this movie is that the makers don't know the real good story bout Count Dracula, Vlad the impaler. the castle design ha ha even in games the 3D designs are better.. so much supernatural(the TV show) here.. demons, undead etc. but not a story bout vampires... my votes -15/10 the best char with hugh jackman - van helsing 2004 and in my opinion if the director was another , someone who has made high rated movies could make this so much better for watchin and excitement... but as i can see this director should stay on the path to make some bad horror movies, don't give him a chance to make another disaster movie like he has done right now about Dracula the blond gay ..
WHO OPODER
It would be a good movie if: Had no unnecessary nudity;The clothes were more appropriate to the time and more rustic;Women do not appear with a look from a beauty salon (much production in the face and hair);The younger actors seem to have left the Glee show.The story became very different, it was not bad, just different. The production is modest, within the available budget. Being a super production is not mandatory and does not guarantee a good movie. The film has some good actors, yes. And it's easy to see who they are, the more experienced and less exaggerated.
