Exoticalot
People are voting emotionally.
Protraph
Lack of good storyline.
Seraherrera
The movie is wonderful and true, an act of love in all its contradictions and complexity
Neive Bellamy
Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.
Adam Hampton
Watch the movie, and note that the director isn't force-feeding you the date and time of the movie. There are slight hints to let you know approximately when it happened. Note the symbolism of the circle, above their heads at the table, and their own lives, all having no beginning or ending, just a loop. That is their future, no matter how they live it. Rich or poor, all are living in a loop.Very well done. There was no need for constant flashbacks. It was explained well enough to understand what happened, and what is now going on.
alanpgini
Took me a while to figure out how to rate this thing, which is always a good high gauge on my barometer of film excellence. Many reviews wanted this to go somewhere. But the complete absence of memory in stark reality, says you wont, because you wont remember where to go. And for those who still have memory, is it worth having if you are isolated? And if you have intelligence, how do you fight this plague? It also gives a stark look at the ID. Who are we without memory, when all we have left, is our basic nature? I have seen many memory loss movies, but this is by far the best. The acting is superlative, on all fronts. Just like any film buff, I like a good conclusion. But I was happy with this negative one, because of the very nature of the subject matter. In this case, the beginning was the ending, and well, visa versa.
crspano
I loved the acting. my favorites are Tucker Smallwood and Jason Ritter. I thought the bunker vignette was an interesting contrast against the other story lines. The bunker characters look to the future and the notion of hope or the eventual demise of the human race. You have to consider that this is an independent movie shot on a tiny budget. With that in mind the directing, camera-work and editing are awesome. If you appreciate movies, script writing and directing you will value this movie. In summary, it is a thought provoking concept. Could the human race survive for very long without memory. Would there in fact be any social context for the survivors. This of course goes back to the plot line and writing the script. How do you hold it all together and advance the plot when none of the characters with the exception of the bunker characters can remember what happened a few minutes in the past. An interesting and challenging writing and directing dilemma. if you really enjoy movies as an art form Embers will give you something to think about
gavin6942
After a global neurological epidemic, those who remain search for meaning and connection in a world without memory.On its surface, "Embers" is a very simple movie. We have a series of people who have lost their memory to varying degrees. Some can remember for a day, some only minutes. A few seem to be able to push the limits a little bit further. Good science fiction is taking reality as we know it, and pushing the edges out just a bit to what is not yet actual, but possible. And "Embers" succeeds in that endeavor.Writer-director Claire Carre was fully aware of the importance of keeping the infection idea grounded in reality. "I did a ton of research, looking at different neurological case studies, and specially looking at the lives of people with amnesia
The characters in the film suffer from symptoms similar to the type of brain damage you might get from viral encephalitis." Thus, what we see in "Embers" is entirely possible, as unlikely as it might be that amnesia would occur on a (presumably) global scale.Whether intentional or not, the film evokes the idea of location as a character in its own right. The filmmakers went out of their way to find just the right settings: an abandoned church in Gary, Indiana and an underground bunker in Poland are two prominent examples. The bunker shown in the film is not a set, but was built as part of the Nazi line of defense during WWII. The spiral staircase scene is real: the stairs run ten stories deep with over twenty miles of underground tunnels to explore. The locations serve as characters because they tell as much of the story – perhaps more – than the humans, showing how much the world has fallen into decay.Within the simple plot structure, we are left to find subtle messages on our own. At least two dichotomies are evident: Hope versus Chaos, and Freedom versus Safety. Freedom versus Safety is a bit more obvious, as the character of Miranda and her father have a discussion touching on these themes. After years of isolation, she longs to be free, to search for her mother or just to see new surroundings. Her father, perhaps wiser, tries to explain how she is the safest she could ever be: one step outside, and she risks falling victim just like everyone else. So which is the right way to live: alone and safe, or free and struggling? The character of Chaos is in the form of a man, but could just as easily be a metaphor for chaos in general. The world, left to its own devices, will inevitably decay and turn to dust. He is part of that process, just working at an accelerated rate, killing and smashing as he plows through life like a hurricane. Countering him is Boy, who stands as a metaphor for hope. Just as Chaos wanders, so does Boy, and we get the impression that maybe, possibly, he has not been affected by the virus. Because he is mute we can never fully gauge his memory, but he seems to comprehend the passing of days better than anyone else. If there are more Boys (and Girls) in the world, it may not decay and chaos may not reign after all. This one character (Boy) inverts the whole narrative from a tragic, depressing tale into one of hope."Embers" is a complicated film disguised as a simple one. For anyone who wants to see a film about a glimmer of hope in a world at its lowest, this is the film for you. "Embers" premieres July 22 at the Fantasia International Film Festival.