Fabled

2002 "There once was a wolf named Lupold..."
5| 1h24m| R| en
Details

Joseph just broke up with his girlfriend and is not taking it very well. He thinks she is plotting against him with their mutual psychiatrist. His dog is missing and he suspects the people at work might be behind it. Then there is the unshakable guilt over his past. It just might all be bearable, somehow possible to live through, if it weren't for those damned 'monsters' that keep trying to kill him. Through an allegorical 'fable' that is told in parallel with Joseph's struggle, we are left to decide for ourselves in the end, who is the crow and who is the wolf., was someone out to get Joseph, was it a stroke of bad luck, or was it all in his head?

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Steinesongo Too many fans seem to be blown away
SpunkySelfTwitter It’s an especially fun movie from a director and cast who are clearly having a good time allowing themselves to let loose.
Phillipa Strong acting helps the film overcome an uncertain premise and create characters that hold our attention absolutely.
Staci Frederick Blistering performances.
tempoemarea I like this movie very much. It is very flashy and stylized, but still thoughtful and entertaining. The acting was very good, particularly the actor who played Joseph. I'm looking forward to seeing him in some more films. I also liked the psychiatrist that looked like Peter Sellers. He should have played him in that awful movie about Sellers. Was he supposed to look like Sellers for a reason?The best part was the fable. I loved that extra layer.I read some of the reviews of the movie. No one seems to like it much. They say it leaves a lot of questions unanswered. I don't understand why that's a bad thing. I also don't remember there being much unanswered too.SPOILERS *******In the end, she was fooling around with his friend and probably the psychiatrist and so he made it look like she killed them both.What's so hard to understand?END SPOILERS ******I guess I would agree with the critics that there wasn't much to the plot. However, since when does a complicated plot make a movie.
frelonbrun There is a certain bias when it comes to foreign films in America. American critics cut foreign films more slack. If you have a film in French and it has no discernible plot and is very interpretive, then it is considered artistic, abstract and everything was intentional. Now if an American made the same film in English, then that film is labeled vague, meandering, and the filmmakers were unable to make it complex, especially without being pretentious.It is a double standard.Don't believe me? Okay, how about this. Take Hero - Make it in English, with Bruce Willis instead of Jet Li and have it take place in the old west, but otherwise the exact same film. In fact, let the same director direct it, but change his name to Frank Walker instead of Yimou Zhang. Critics will hate it. Yet, it has just as much story and just as good, if not better performances, since Bruce Willis is probably a better actor than Jet Li. Why would they hate it? It wasn't in Chinese, about Chinese history, starring Chinese actors and made by Chinese filmmakers. Lost in translation -I watched Fabled and I couldn't help feel that it was very European at heart. If you compare this to I'll Sleep When I'm Dead, you'll find Fabled is the stronger of the two, yet that Mike Hodges film is considered great film-making, and the critics found this arrogant and not successful.Another glaring double standard is symbolism. In Europe and perhaps the rest of the world, symbolism is smart film-making. In the United States it's always looked upon as one, unnecessary and two, as the filmmaker thinking he/she is being clever when they clearly aren't.It all comes down to expectations. This isn't Memento, nor is it the Grudge.Come on people, the movie is called Fabled. If you go into it not expecting symbolism and a references to a fable, then go watch Boogeyman.If you like to think at the movies, at least more than about why did this cost so much, then spend some time with Fabled.PS. Don't listen to those who say it is only worth one viewing. While there are no twists, there is plenty going on for another go. If only for understanding the voice over alone it is worth that second try.
gumpyflies Simon from the movie Go goes nuts. This is one of those everyone's out to get me paranoid flicks. If you like the is-it-really- happening-or-not storyline, then Fabled is for you. If you are looking for something really scary go rent the Exorcist or the Ring again. The filmmakers try to make more out of a very simple plot and it works for the most part, but it could have used a bit more in the plot department. The acting is as good as could be expected for a small indie movie. Desmond Askew really stands out, but since he's in almost every frame it would be hard to not to. It's hard to say something bad about the movie, since it was clear that so much thought and heart went into to it and nothing was particularly wrong, but I'm not sure it came together in the end. I guess I was a bit disappointed it was just good and not great.
donatsu2000 Fabled is an excellent debut film by newcomer Kirshenbaum. The plot is not very complex, but everything else seems to have been very well thought out. A lot of attention seemed to go in to the performances and subtleties. Visually, it is striking for a small indie pic. Desmond, who I've only seen in Go, was great as the lead.I like the way a lot was left up to interpretation. This is not a film for the intellectually challenged. If you're not paying attention you'll miss a lot of the little details, which are what makes this movie a cut above most.The movie has great atmosphere and mood. I can't wait to see what this writer/director does next.