Janae Milner
Easily the biggest piece of Right wing non sense propaganda I ever saw.
Lidia Draper
Great example of an old-fashioned, pure-at-heart escapist event movie that doesn't pretend to be anything that it's not and has boat loads of fun being its own ludicrous self.
Staci Frederick
Blistering performances.
Pretentious_crap
As my friends have recommended me to watch this movie, because I'm a bad movie buff-- I was told I pretty much had to watch it; for this among titles like "Manos: The Hands of Fate", "Troll 2", "Plan 9...", and "Nukie" which are considered to be what are known as the worst movies ever made. Honestly, I can't say it is one of the worst because it was made to be intentionally bad; setting out to make the worst movie on purpose has been done many times, and so this is nothing new. But when the comedic value from all the crappiness runs thin, there aren't any comic relief characters or an interesting plot to keep you interested. After 50 minuets I fell asleep watching this (yes I was watching the display on my DVD player), and woke up towards the end. Sadly, after reading about what happened in that time-space I fell asleep I don't really care about what I missed.Honestly don't feel bad for not seeing this movie, you could probably make it yourself-- anyone could.
posercore247
Feeders is somewhat like a wrongly tuned piano: it creates a discordant cacophony, a racket considered by some to be utter noise, to others the pinnacle of Art. I champion the latter notion. There is a certain horrific majesty to this film. The kind that transcends its "limitations" and breaks into the realm of the transgressive.There are few films to be nationally released that acquire this level of "badness". Ed Wood certainly achieved this, but in a pre-video age. Here, is a movie, shot on horribly lit video, featuring crudely painted paper bag/sock "puppets" as the villain, video toaster effects, appearing in nation-wide video store chains. In the year 1996. The same year as the forgettable mega-budget "Independence Day".The film is at least not boring. Sure, you can ramble on about it's crude effects, its "acting" and such, but isn't it more interesting than the latest slickly-produced-yet-forgettable horror offering appearing at your local multiplex?
Tim (tim_sparks)
This film is the very definition of "b movie," and this isn't a bad thing (for that, see the sequel).Little Feeders come to terrorize, and no one is safe...from this ridiculous film. It's the Citizen Kane of Paper Bag Puppet films. Take a paper bag, dip it in goop, and use sticks for arms and you've got yourself a bona fido Feeder.What can be said about this film without laughing? The best scene of all involves photos of stuff to try to fool the watcher into thinking those places are in the movie.This movie has to be seen to believed. Just don't continue the madness and see the sequel unless you hate yourself.
quinntune
What do you get when you combine the acting/directing/scriptwriting of John Polonia and John McBride, along with the stunning visual effects of Phillip Ogden?A steaming fen of cinematic s**t, that both amuses and enriches all movie watching after seeing this movie. I've rented this movie 8 times, and I have had all of my friends watch it, as well as my mother and uncle. It seriously is probably the funniest movie I've ever seen. You can't beat special effects that consist of someone drawing stuff on the film with a crayon...And to all you guys who watch this movie...I have a few funny things you should watch for. Watch John Polonia's socks throughout the movie, especially during the scenes in which they run through the forrest. Watch closely the scene when John McBride gets out of the car to run into the doctors office. Watch closely the scene when they listen to the radio report in the car. Notice the pictures that John McBride takes at the flood site, and pay attention to what he says and than does in the next scene.This movie is simply fraught with mistakes and bad effects...Just go rent it, you won't stop laughing.
