Hellen
I like the storyline of this show,it attract me so much
Titreenp
SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?
Solidrariol
Am I Missing Something?
Istvan Kolnhofer
Where to start with a historical action-adventure-romance based on a legendary myth, directed by..... Jerry Zucker.
I don't think they could have chosen a worse director. Ok they could have, but Zucker woefully lacks the vision to helm a blockbuster like this. And it shows - from the drab lifeless cinematography, to the awkward casting of Richard Gere, to the redundant costumes, and a production design that shows the foam and screws the set was put together with.
We can go on and on.. from Jerry Goldsmith's half-assed score, to the awful dialogue, and a villain that encapsulates every cliche in the book... including a DIRTY FACE! Because how would we know that Malagant is the villain if they didn't make his face greasy and smear it with dirt????Right off the bat, the movie opens with a 20th century American Lancelot, swordfighting to show off for villagers, or for money? Can't be sure... the scene serves no other purpose than to show that Richard Gere is a master swordsman, as long as his sword looks lighter than a feather. Everything about this scene seems phony and fabricated. Not a single moment rings of 6th century authenticity.
This movie can't even decide with millennia it is set in, with weapons from the 19th century, costumes that look 16th century, etc... SO HORRIBLE. lol
I get it that this movie isn't for historic authenticity.. but come on, at least display the slightest modicum of attention to historic detail. Its like they got a huge budget, spent it all on Sean Connery and Richard Gere, painted a giant foam castle, and then had to make do with props and costumes already available. I doubt that's the case, but that is what the movie looks like! Recycled from other movies.
Richard Gere as Lancelot could go down as one of top 5 worst casting choices EVER. The man is a mediocre actor, and an even more insufferable movie "star" who coasts on his milquetoast leading man looks. He has the charisma of a retarded puppy.
Didn't anyone see King David? Were lesson NOT learned from that casting???The ONLY redeeming values this movie has, is Sean Connery as Arthur and Julia Ormond as Guinevere. Both sparkle in their poorly written roles, and you could tell than in a better movie, this could have been top career performances from them, but they get buried in the mediocre production and Richard Gere's anachronistic presence. I cannot think of a more disappointed movie, its so bad.
Skip this entirely and just stick to EXCALIBUR, a masterpiece, or even Antoine Fuqua's King Arthur, which is at least a pretty good action movie with some cinematic flair. But this FIRST KNIGHT is a turd of the first order.
djk-38670
It has been years since I watched this movie, but whenever anyone asks me what the worst movie I ever watched ... it's this one. Yes it's pretty, but I could not believe anything that happened. I wondered if there was an in house joke where they believed it would never be released? Whenever I measure performance, quality and value this is my low bar at 0.
annbreuer
This movie enchanted me when I was a 13 year old girl. Recently I spotted it on Netflix Instant and decided to see if it held up 19 years later. Uhh, no. Medieval Han Solo gallops to and fro rescuing a princess stock character not once but TWICE and in between he pressures her to have sex with him. Julia Ormond is the picture of some dude's idea of feminine perfection, alternating between girlish impetuosity, over the top expressions of feminine fragility ("It's so beautiful I'm almost frightened!"), and gazing slack-jawed at her two love interests. BARF. Richard Gere delivers a stellar comedic performance as Lancelot, sword-wielding, moat-diving, swaggering and tossing about his luxurious locks. Even Sean Connery cannot make this movie less silly. But on the other hand, young Sir Davos is featured, and that's pretty awesome.
amethystwings32
I love this movie,Richard Gere (Lancelot) was the hero, that won the heart of Julia Ormond (Guinevere).In this movie she was to marry the King.Which she did even though she loved the first knight.When they met he was just a common man that fought for money. That is my mom's take on the epic tale of King Arther and Lancelot. Mine I love this movie as well, it is one of the best renditions . About the legend of Camelot, I have seen it has adventure lust. And forbidden love , between Lancelot and Guinevere! But this tale of the sorted love triangle, has a dark side like all movies. It has a villain Ben Cross (Maligant) a cruel black hearted monster. Whose sole purpose was to dethrone the King and claim Camelot as his own! Until his untimely demise , by the sword of the first knight!
