Claysaba Excellent, Without a doubt!!

Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Hayden Kane There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes

Clarissa Mora The tone of this movie is interesting -- the stakes are both dramatic and high, but it's balanced with a lot of fun, tongue and cheek dialogue.

kosmasp There are movies that only (or more likely) work when you watch them with children. Or with your inner child being on. This is no Pixar and nowhere near it of course. But it's still a nice little movie, that succeeds in letting us into a world where flies can be heroes. Of course no kid will want their parents to buy them flies after that ... And of course, the flies do not look anything like real flies. There are quite a few animated movies out there, where science was thrown out for fantasy ... same happens here.The 3-D is decent enough, but it's more the dialogue and the characters that might convince to watch this and like it. On the other hand, I can see that some people will find it "too patriotic". But I do think, that it plays clever on the whole old rivalry, the two (former) most powerful countries had. If you can handle the cynic in you, you will actually enjoy this

soger It is pretty surreal what these flies can do... eh well... this is a cartoon, so anything can happen in it.At first I must tell you that I love animated movies. Unfortunately this year's repertoire is very weak. This cartoon is nothing but a list of flaws:1) I quoted the tag line. It suggests that this movie has great 3D effects. Well, I did not see any, at least not something special I never saw before.2) The "flies" in this movie look nothing like real flies. At least they could've make them black. But cyan flies, seriously? With giant heads and slim torsos?3) The story. I guess it was written for 6 year old kids. I could tell it in two sentences it is so over simplified.4) Excessive patriotism. For example: "They are American files after all!" Oh, give me a break.

ilikepuppies I saw this about two weeks ago in the theater and dismissed it as pedestrian in all but one area. The 3-D, I thought was done in a new way (to this inexperienced viewer). A way that convinced me, in fact that after many decades in existence already, the technology was hitting a breakthrough moment and had a huge future yet ahead of it. My theory was then, and is now that this film started as an excuse to showcase an innovation in 3D animation. Probably made by computer specialists with little to no experience with narrative creativity.No, these guys instead specialize in spatial creativity. And I gotta say that the experience in the world of this film stuck with me. It has changed me in a minor way. The way I think spatially has been permanently altered just so much.Here's the deal. I've seen 3D just a few times, but to my experience, it had always been gimmicky. Fun, but gimmicky because the only trick anyone seemed to know was the push-objects-into-our-faces thing, which is merely a carnival ride, a novelty.But this! Somebody here is using a much more profound approach. Instead of being merely prodded at, the viewers here have an entire world built around them architecturally. A strong feeling of occupying the same space as the characters is created. Movies are all about engagement, the deeper the engagement, the more we like them. This film demonstrates how 3D alone can engage.There's a big future for the product highlighted in this advertisement.

Mike Barnett As long as there's been 3d technology, (1950's I think) there's been animation made for it. I remember specifically, a Donald Duck cartoon with Chip and Dale in it. I don't remember the name at the moment, but the plot was that Donald worked at a circus, was feeding an elephant peanuts and Chip and Dale were stealing the peanuts. This was made to watch in 3d probably 1960's. If you happened to watch Meet the Robinsons in 3d in theaters, they showed this cartoon before the movie and explained the details of it's origin. There are probably somewhere around 100 cartoons made specifically to be viewed through 3d glasses. This claim was a bad move because it's not difficult to prove them wrong. On top of that, this just looks like a bad movie.