Leoni Haney
Yes, absolutely, there is fun to be had, as well as many, many things to go boom, all amid an atmospheric urban jungle.
stormhawk2018
Man, this movie is not for great shakes...but curious as it may seem "Home Alone 3" has not seemed so sloppy as they put it. And at the risk of filling my humble criticism of negative votes I will try to defend, as I can, because it is unnecessary (that is undeniable) third part can be entertaining despite its failures.The story moves away from the McCallister family to present us with a new headline by Alex Pruitt, the new rogue who will pass them on to the bad guys on duty. And it turns out that at the hands of the child comes a toy car with a military chip that high-level thieves want to get at any price. And, as always, Alex will defend his house ... also at the same price. Oh, and it's Scarlett Johansson's sister, almost nothing.Well, when the synopsis is made, the question is: does the movie have fun? Well, in my opinion, of course, as long as you do not have anything better to do, you can enjoy (not laugh out loud, that was in the first two) of this third part. Alex D. Linz I think it plays a good role as a substitute for the original Kevin, I found it funny and nice but it is normal that the shadow of Macaulay is very long. On the other hand this third part has something that improves with respect to his second that no one seems to value: he tries to differentiate himself from the previous ones by putting different situations (Alex is not alone in his house although nobody believes there are thieves lurking) as well as traps totally original Do they make fun? Fair, but the formula is pretty exhausted. But remember that the great evil of his (in my opinion good but somewhat overrated) second part was to be a copy of his predecessor, here does not happen the same, is more original within what fits.For the rest, the film does not give much more than if because, as I said, it is already very seen and it is hard to laugh at something you already know. The family of Alex are quite flat and do not give tender moments but where the film fails miserably is on the subject of the villains. And with better villains, maybe the movie would have been better valued. Now there are not two, but four thieves, but more does not mean better. They are excessively serious and boring, characters identical to each other so their personality is not marked, no doubt you miss the funny Harry and Marv of the first two parts.Finally I will give another reason why I approve this movie: "Home Alone 4". And I have had the "luck" to have seen this insult (not only the saga, but the cinema in general) in the form of a quarter before the third. Given the level of slop that the saga arrives with the 4, I can not but raise a little this third part that is infinitely better.Conclusion, an unnecessary third part but I think you can see, if you do not kill this saga, stay with the first two (especially the original), if you like the tricks of these children, you can give this third party a chance . But stay there, hell really starts from now on.
Bob Smith
John Hughes disappoints in this one. This film is that of the most ridiculous, over-the-top I have ever seen (besides mega shark vs giant squid, that was abysmal).First of all, the traps in this movie would kill ya! No way did that bloke fall down 4 stories, landing on his back, to then walk away like nothing happened. No way did those two fellas jump into sub-zero waters and walk out like they just got out the shower or sum ting. The most ludicrous part of this movie was when the geezer with the budget roller skates did a front flip down some stairs. WHAT WAS THAT ALL ABOUT?!?!This film offended me. Overall I give it a 1 :)It was pretty funny though, watch it if you fancy some laughs just do not watch it with your kids!
adonis98-743-186503
Different cast, different director, different everything even tho it's not perfect it's still better than the reviews that it has here. Home Alone 3 doesn't have great direction or casting or even acting but it has 4 or 5 scenes that they totally killed it and it was hilarious it also has some scenes that they are so bad written and the humor is pretty awkward i wouldn't call it a bad sequel or the worst film of all time but for sure is not that bad too it's not perfect but it's OK although it has that made for TV feel. I give it a 6 i was around a 5 but i think that was pretty low even tho Kevin isn't back the new kid was actually pretty OK. Scarlett Johansson also has a small role here and let's face it it's miles better than Home Alone 4.
