Honeymoon

1997
5.6| 1h33m| en
Details

Eric and Louise's honeymoon is disrupted by a stranger who claims he will perform a miracle. Meanwhile, Eric's brother and best friend are both experiencing trouble with their own relationships and want to warn him about challenges of marriage.

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

All Prime Video Movies and TV Shows. Cancel anytime. Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Breakinger A Brilliant Conflict
Motompa Go in cold, and you're likely to emerge with your blood boiling. This has to be seen to be believed.
Phillida Let me be very fair here, this is not the best movie in my opinion. But, this movie is fun, it has purpose and is very enjoyable to watch.
Brooklynn There's a more than satisfactory amount of boom-boom in the movie's trim running time.
vchimpanzee Eric is marrying Louise. His brother Anthony has been married to Helen for eight years and wants to warn Eric marriage won't be that great. Helen's not too happy either. Eric's best friend Jamie has been married to Debra only seven weeks and already they're having problems.Eric's boss lets the couple have his spectacular house in the country, in a gorgeous wooded setting. Of course, Eric's boss also expects him to work. And Jamie shows up, having been kicked out by Debra--who eventually ends up at the house threatening suicide.And then there's the vagrant outside. Or is he a vagrant? What is he building? Only Vicky seems to have the answers about Newman (that's his name).And almost no one seems understand what it means to be faithful in a relationship.The depressing funeral music with the opening credits told me this might very well be one of those movies that appeals to those people who like poetry in coffeehouses. Had it not been for Tammy Lauren, I might have given up on this. But I'm glad I didn't. Tammy turned out to be everything I had hoped for--slightly less quirky than Ginger in "Homefront", but somewhat more troubled.Thomas Cavanagh was also funny, and Susan Wilkey made Vicky even quirkier than Debra. Unfortunately, despite what I perceived to be good acting, especially by Pascale Bussières and Stephen Shellen, I'm still not certain this wasn't the type of movie that would appeal to the coffee house crowd. It had its funny moments, but Bussières and Shellen didn't strike me as funny (certainly not in the laugh-out- loud sense), and I didn't find them all that entertaining either. Mostly I enjoyed watching the very patient Louise endure one frustration after another. I was hoping Newman would be funny, but he seemed more like one of these characters from a Bronte novel (or what I'm guessing those characters must be like).These are just my impressions, and perhaps someone with different taste would enjoy this movie more.