Rio Hayward
All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.
Beulah Bram
A film of deceptively outspoken contemporary relevance, this is cinema at its most alert, alarming and alive.
Edwin
The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.
Prismark10
This early Boulting brothers film is a low budget quickie based on a stage play with an axe to grind on the role of the Coroner's court.However the Boutlings turn this into superior courtroom drama with some comedy presided over a fussy, supercilious, biased and officious Coroner.A gun is found hidden behind a wall in an attic with what looks like a bullet being fired. A young woman who was the previous occupier of the house ends up being accused of killing her husband who was previously labelled as dying of heart failure. The Coroner's inquest will decide the actual cause of death and his verdict could lead to the young woman being sent to stand trial for murder in the Old Bailey.A distinguished King's Counsel who is a family friend is acting for her, but the widow wants to maintain her silence and is fatalistic. It seems she is protecting somebody and her case is also hampered by the attitude of the Coroner.This is actually a rather enjoyable yarn, the denouement was slightly complicated and unlikely. The setting kind of gives the film's stage bound origins away.
Leofwine_draca
INQUEST is a short, early effort from the famous Boulting brothers, a film that was originally based on a stage play which becomes apparent in the single location nature of the proceedings. And what a delight it is to watch. Initially when I read that this was a courtroom drama exposing the workings of the coroner's court, I thought it would be dry beyond belief and more than a little dull given the era.Not at all. In fact, this is almost a comedy, with the cast giving occasionally histrionic turns as the script requires, and it's certainly very funny despite the deadly serious nature of the narrative. In essence, a young woman is accused of her husband's murder when her gun is found hidden behind a wall and missing a bullet that was lodged in her husband's back.The rest of the story is made up of the court trial as the facts of the case go back and forth. And what this all boils down to in actuality is a battle of wits between the fussy and old-fashioned coroner, played by Herbert Lomas, and the idealistic KC, played with relish by Hay Petrie. These two guys argue their points, engage in shouting matches, and overact with relish. They alone are responsible for much of this film's entertainment value, such as it is, and both actors deserve commendations for making the antics of their characters so enjoyable to watch.
trimmerb1234
Although short in duration this is distinctly a cut above a "quota quickie". Hay Petrie, who seems to have later been consigned to many small but distinctive supporting roles, here is centre stage in the court-room scene, gives a very spirited and dominating performance and makes the most of, for once for him, a very good role. Opposite him is a worthy foil both in terms of script and actor in the shape of (and here is a very rare thing) a comic Coroner with only too obvious human failings. The quotations in the opening credits questioning the purpose of a Coroner suggest that someone might have been grinding an axe in this intelligent and entertaining legal/crime-comedy.
malcolmgsw
The Boulting Brothers had a long and fairly distinguished career which stretched from the 30s into the 70s.They started,as did many technicians of that era in quota quickies.This film is a whodunit played out during the course of a Coroners Inquest. Herbert Lomas plays the rather tetchy coroner,who being wound up by the ever present police officer,wants to thwart the eager eyed barrister,played by Hay Petrie from taking the spotlight off of him.Eventually,mainly through the efforts of petrie we discover who killed the deceased the subject of the inquest.It does become rather convoluted and slightly difficult to follow.Elizabeth Allen maintains her silence almost to the end,which is rather unbelievable when her silence is likely to lead her straight to the Old Bailey.No better or worse than many similar films of the same genre.
