WillSushyMedia
This movie was so-so. It had it's moments, but wasn't the greatest.
FrogGlace
In other words,this film is a surreal ride.
Doomtomylo
a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.
Frances Chung
Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable
Tweetienator
Interview with the Vampire is like Bram Stoker's Dracula one of the few very good to outstanding vampire movies and on top with a good shot of gothic horror atmosphere. No Twilight or Underworld mass pulp here.Excellent movie with a good story, fine acting and sometimes outstanding visuals. A classic and must-have for every serious vampire collection. Thumbs, sorry, teeth up!
cinemajesty
Movie Review: "Interview with the Vampire" (1994)Closer to its 25th year of first receptions, the unmissable hyponotic nature of director Neil Jordan's movie adaptation of Anne Rice's 1976 Vampire Chronicles debut has nothing lost of its seductive power.Too close seem Hollywood giants Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt intervene as vampire companions, one "the hunter", the other "the giver" only to heartbreaking proportions, when the character of Claudia, portrayed to newly-cast highest beating potential by 12-year-old Kirsten Dunst, the vampire, which learns, feeds, seduces and hunts but never transform into an adult woman for deadly love.Calmly ascending to the major stardom to come, actor Brad Pitt fights through nearly every scene in order to come to terms with the nature of eternal life, meeting supporting stars Antonio Banderas and Stephan Rea through magnificiently gothically shimmering 35mm cinematography as Tom Cruise must steal the show due to utmost professionalism in an high-end sexual as sensual driven beats of homosexuality.Cinemajesty Entertainments LLC 2018
Andres-Camara
Why I say, seeing the background of the film? Because this movie that is of vampires, I do not really see it as a vampire movie, I see it as a Neil Jordan movie, bone, liberals against no liberals, I'll explain it in spoiler zone. That's why I like this movie. Some struggle for their individual freedom and others struggle not to be what they are. I do not know if many people will say what I'm talking about but it's what I see that shows this movie.The film, is an entertainment production with almost a great deal. Set in many centuries and is very well set. We believe the whole atmosphere.The actors are great. Kirsten Dunst is brutal, what a discovery, for me almost the best part of her career. Tom Cruise, who has already demonstrated how great he is, does it again.He has a very nice picture. Proper and well conditioned. The movie tells us.The address is normal. Entertains. Normal planes, nothing more. But it is well worn.It has a setting, wardrobe and makeup that is very good.What happens is that it does not become a mythical movie. Stay in entertainment.Spoiler:I love the show between the two, Tom Cruise and Brad Pitt, two ways of being so different, one looks at his individual freedom taken to the extreme and the other can not accept what is almost let himself die. And the confrontation decides with Kirsten Dunst, who a moment comments that why they did not ask if she would always want to be like that, because they decided for her. Can there be a more liberal thinking? Can anyone be opposed to it?
Smoreni Zmaj
In endless sea of vampire vomit, this movie stands as one of the best movies in vampire "genre", and after every vampire crap I have misfortune to see I gladly go back to this one to wash off crap from my brain.I don't like Kirsten and I hate Tom Cruise, but here both of them fit perfectly. Brad is good by default, I love Christian, and the only issue is Banderas. I simply can not see him as vampire, but his role is too small to have influence on overall impression...........................................
