GarnettTeenage The film was still a fun one that will make you laugh and have you leaving the theater feeling like you just stole something valuable and got away with it.

Aedonerre I gave this film a 9 out of 10, because it was exactly what I expected it to be.

Doomtomylo a film so unique, intoxicating and bizarre that it not only demands another viewing, but is also forgivable as a satirical comedy where the jokes eventually take the back seat.

Casey Duggan It’s sentimental, ridiculously long and only occasionally funny

bsolorio81 I never leave a review on a movie. But this is absolutely the worst movie ever. I couldn't even finish watching it, it was so bad. I stopped halfway through. Whoever produced and directed this movie should be black listed from ever making movies again. I don't get how people gave this movie the OK.

fedor8 We already know this demon is completely impervious to everything hence invincible hence why is there a sequel? Or prequel... whatever.The film wastes no time on gore and action, I'll give it that. From the first minute - it's on, which can't be said of many horror films that waste time on "character study" and "build-up". Unfortunately, the flick also wastes no time on being stupid.1. A truck that attacks cops and contains dozens of corpses is practically ABANDONED by cops, towed away like some ordinary vehicle by just two of them. DUMB.2. The demon leaves the two cops - then comes back. Why did he leave in the first place? Why did he kill just one of them? Demons work in mysterious ways.3. And why does the female cop point her gun at him - while he's killing another cop - yet doesn't shoot? This is a COP, aren't they supposed to be trigger-happy? If there is anything that should trigger the happiness to pull the trigger, it's facing a demon. Hasn't Hollywood's Left been telling us for decades that American cops can't wait to kill someone? DUMB.4. Why isn't the army involved? The cops use an ancient machine-gun instead, as if the military is too busy to send troops to help out this town. Because OBVIOUSLY every little town should be able to handle a major supernatural threat on their own, without pestering the Pentagon for help.5. The four teens discovering the truck - a fun scene but so stupid.6. "No phone service here". Really? 2017, and still we have the new-old "can't get a signal here" baloney. Horror writers and mobile phones: they just can't seem to solve that obstacle. Writers of thrillers and horrors must hate mobile phones.7. OK, fine, we know the demon is powerful and a world-class athlete and all, but how the hell did it manage to impale both teens with one spear throw when the teens were running away next to each other as opposed to one behind the other? Even "Transporter 3" doesn't play around with basic laws of physics to such a silly extent.8. That stupid argument between the cops over the demon's severed hand. There are better ways to do exposition. And there are times when no exposition is needed: we get it, the hand is key, stop boring us with nonsense.9. The fat cop's only purpose seems to be to be a nuisance and for others to waste screen time trying to convince him to get on with the program.10. Does the guy who directed/wrote this even know how a ricochet works? Ricochet doesn't mean "goes back to sender" as Salvo seems to believe. Pretty silly.11. The truck driver turns his back on the monster to phone the cops. Why must everyone be an imbecile, Salvo?Despite being stupid, it's not an awful movie because it isn't too boring and visually it avoids the modern trappings of being mono-colour. It's refreshing to see a normal-looking horror film that isn't filmed through drab blue-grey filters. Would have been a tighter film if it'd been trimmed 15 minutes or so; lousy useless dialog and other nonsense waste screen time.

pietroschek First of all: The movie has some very good efforts invested, but more bad ones, too.Jeepers Ceepers 3 dares to face the problem of sequels rarely succeeding. Such is noteworthy, and the first 7 minutes of the movie I would have hoped this to become 8 or 9 stars.It did not, for several reasons.The insectoid actors efforts, and the police conviction were good acting. The story considered that the 'bad guy' had been successful before AND that the local superstition was already proven a rural legend!But key mistakes were made:YA is the shortage for young adult. Not for alternate-sexuality ugly teenage-twiddle brains.Actors who are busy showing how gay they are cannot focus on the acting, and hence spoil it for more viewers than they score outside of films with naked homosexuals.The plot runs low, gets boring and lengthy. Lack of additional content, side-kick characters adding their view of the legend. Too linear with that little bit of granny knows how to dig-out bad guys secret weakness.There is no final, as climate is so lacking I daresay it doesn't exist. Poho County police staring in disbelief, frustration, and helplessness from behind the barrel of the own shotgun did not remedy this either.Given health and 2 weeks of care (plus watching the 3 movies again) I could retell it as a Dracula or Alien story, and so could any even just mediocre roleplaying GM or ST.

paulclaassen This film was ok-ish as a film on its own, but not as a sequel, as all the rules from the original were thrown overboard. This installment was not scary at all and the make-up was also not as good. Also, the Creeper seems to prefer to roam during the day - why? He has interesting new gadgets, but I'm just wondering if the idea of a predator who comes to feed every 23 years and being this innovative is really credible? Why doesn't he just hunt like a predator? Like he does in the first two movies. Is he moving with the times, as well? This fact - and the fact that he hunts during the day - makes him that much less scary. The film is not entirely bad, but also not entirely memorable. There are some great action scenes towards the end, though.