HottWwjdIam There is just so much movie here. For some it may be too much. But in the same secretly sarcastic way most telemarketers say the phrase, the title of this one is particularly apt.

Lachlan Coulson This is a gorgeous movie made by a gorgeous spirit.

Bob This is one of the best movies I’ve seen in a very long time. You have to go and see this on the big screen.

Walter Sloane Mostly, the movie is committed to the value of a good time.

Niklas Pivic What a heap of troubles.Sweden often combats crime; one may say it's "our" forté.Trouble is, the same actors adapt the same dour, sour stance when affronting the crimes perpetrated by other film-makers and actors, all from Sweden. It's a downward trajectory.Here, the biggest crime is courtesy of Jacob Eklund, who would not be able to act his way out of a paper bag; he's far too lackadaisical and apathetic to be a lead guy, and his character's simply not believable.This story is somewhat interesting as one specific criminal quickly proves to be an informant for the police. That's about it, really. The action is questionable as I kept looking at my wall behind the TV at times, for more exciting stuff; I'm not exaggerating when writing it.Fingers crossed for more excitement.

Bene Cumb In fact, for me, the film in question was the first one to familiarize myself with Johan Falk - although the first films with this character were shot a decade before. When the participation of Beck or Wallander in chases and shootings was rather limited, then Falk has well "settled" in the challenges related to modern depravities and felonies; Sweden is not a nice and calm place anymore - mostly due to the influx of immigrants and development of mobility - and more severe crimes need more severe measures to be taken. Falk and his colleagues are equal to the task, using all the help the modern technology can provide. Nevertheless, old approaches are still in place, enabling to exploit the Frank Wagner's character (giftedly performed by Joel Kinnaman), who sometimes overshadows Johan Falk himself (well, Jakob Eklund is pleasant, even as older). Anyway, all the characters spending more time on screen are elaborated and well played, and there is no contrasting of "good" and "bad" guys.Thus, the film is virtually as good as any good British crime thriller, for example. I am eager to see all other Falk films as soon as possible.

awpkiller2 There aren't many titles to reckon with when it comes to Swedish action/thriller genre. Remember the Hamilton disaster? It was suppose to be a movie, but instead it's tagged as a TV production at IMDb. Again the Swedish film industry tries and fails miserably. I'm not being mean by saying that, just realistic. There aren't many talented film makers to start with in Sweden. And those with talent are never around Swedish action/thriller productions.This is just another typical cop-snitch story written poorly and directed with a terrible manner. Acting was good, but I couldn't say that about all the actors in these series of GSI movies. There are a few of them(don't wanna name them) that should NEVER be in front of a camera, or nowhere near a film-making-team. What I hated the most with GSI is that through out the whole set of them, you get the feeling that your watching a B-TV-series. The camera shot's all the angles stiffly, and you get a feeling that your watching a theatre play. The "action" scenes are also similar, and have no dynamic at all. I don't have to be an expert to know that capturing the action scenes badly will result in a disaster.That being said, GSI is not a disaster, it could have been worse. As I understand many people "with low expectation" actually enjoy the GSI series and movies alike. And the film industry in Sweden probably makes a few bucks(kronor) out of them. But with these low expectations and poor directing there might never be born a-grate-action-movie-of-Sweden. I'll keep dreaming of that day to come.

Enchorde Recap: Johan Falk is back in Sweden after his work at Europol ended. He joins GSI, a special task force in the Swedish Police against organized crime. This task force has a unusual high success rate and when a series of unusually brutal robberies GSI is the spearhead. They get a tip that few of the robbers are hiding in hotel downtown, but the hit against them goes awry. One of the GSI members is killed in shootout and then everything breaks lose. But in this chaos Johan Falk is approached by one of the robbers, claiming to be on the payroll of the killed cop claiming to be innocent. Now the two of them can't rely on anyone, neither cops nor robbers, and least of all each other.Comments: The fourth movie about Johan Falk, a series that started with Noll Tolerans (1999), and the first one in a few more movies in the series. The series has been successful because that it has emphasized the suspense instead of effects and high-octane action, things that budget constraints and lack of experience in the Swedish movie industry make almost impossible. GSI, Gruppen för särskilda insatser, continue to do this very well. And that are a very good thing, because the few special effects that are in the movie are ridiculously bad.But the things it can do well, it really does well. Gruppen för särskilda insatser is a very good, at least for Swedish standards, actionthriller, with the emphasis on thriller. It is a good story that builds the suspense slowly but at moments it really put me on the edge. The team behind the movie knows what they can do well, and they do it really well.I think the cast does well too, even if it is a risky proposition to put a well known comedian as the lieutenant of the task force. With few exceptions, that gamble worked out well. Jakob Eklund returns as Johan Falk, and does it well, but that was critically important for the series. It is never a good idea to change actor as the lead character. The others in the supporting cast does well too, even if the story revolves very much about only three characters.One of the few Swedish movies that I actually liked, but that comes with what I stated above. It's a thriller that just has the aim to be a good thriller, nothing more. And therefore it succeeds.7/10