Softwing Most undeservingly overhyped movie of all time??

Grimossfer Clever and entertaining enough to recommend even to members of the 1%

Sammy-Jo Cervantes There are moments that feel comical, some horrific, and some downright inspiring but the tonal shifts hardly matter as the end results come to a film that's perfect for this time.

Roy Hart If you're interested in the topic at hand, you should just watch it and judge yourself because the reviews have gone very biased by people that didn't even watch it and just hate (or love) the creator. I liked it, it was well written, narrated, and directed and it was about a topic that interests me.

davidmuntjac What a mess of a movie! The first few minutes were fine with some good location filming and a voiceover by the main character which explained why he was walking along the beach towards a large house and windmill. He discovered two bodies in the house but from that point I simply couldn't follow what was going on. One thing's for sure - if you don't want to be a murder suspect don't go rummaging around for documents, leaving a trail of fingerprints. If no one saw you approach the house you take the money you think you're owed and get out quick. The next hour was a total mess. I have no idea who several of the characters were or how they came to be involved. Who was the blind pianist who popped up wherever the script required him to? Why did the character Walter never reappear after his one scene despite being at the other end of a phone? Why did Hugh McDermott's character think the blind man drove off in a speedboat? By the end of the film I was totally confused as to who was working with who or what they were doing. The murderer was revealed but as to his motives - who knows?If the voiceover had continued for the whole film this may have helped explain the plot. On the other hand it may have just confirmed that none of it made any sense.The acting was pretty suspect too, particularly that of the star Hugh McDermott who gave an extremely unconvincing performance.I've given this film three stars but only because I did enjoy the location filming in Sussex and London.This is the second film on Renown's Crime Collection Volume 3 DVD set and is probably the poorest to appear on any of the first three volumes. There are a few forgotten gems to be found, such as The Third Alibi on Volume 2, but you can't expect them all to sparkle.

Leofwine_draca JOHNNY ON THE SPOT is one of the worst British crime films I've seen. Everything about it says that it's an entirely derivative effort with zero effort made in terms of writing, acting, and direction. The guy who wrote and directed it, Maclean Rogers, also helmed a handful of serviceable detective potboilers including some of the Paul Temple series, but this is his worst yet.The film features the charisma-free Hugh McDermott as a guy who's released from prison before immediately blundering into a murder scene. He's apparently treated as a suspect by the non-existent police force, and must clear his name, with only the clue of an old blind man to go on. The plot that follows is completely incomprehensible and I still didn't have any idea what was happening as the credits rolled. Nothing about the film rings true, and it all feels obscured and murky.The only interesting thing about JOHNNY ON THE SPOT is that a few of the supporting actors are well known from the period. Valentine Dyall, Ronald Leigh-Hunt, and Ronald Adam all make appearances here. The fresh-faced Scottish starlet Elspet Gray was married to British comedian Brian Rix, while McDermott appeared in the same year's DEVIL GIRL FROM MARS.

malcolmgsw This film starts out encouragingly enough when 2 murdered bodies are found by the leading man in a house with a blind man playing a piano. You get some idea of the confusion to follow when our hero wipes his prints on items by the dead man but then leaves a trail of fingerprints throughout the house.Additionally the blind man hears him going about the house,so why didn't he hear the murders? After that all is confusion and the actual murderer introduced until late in the film which entails a lot of explanatory dialogue.Despite this and running through the film a second time I still don't quite understand what the plot was.

GUENOT PHILIPPE I'll be fair. I don't know the director and none the characters either. It's only a British thriller, grade B of course, among several hundred of others. A feature I will forget after tomorrow. It's not the British cinema at his best. Far from that.A guy is charged to take some documents from another guy, in a house near a beach, and he finds the man dead. So our lead tries to clear himself from a murder charge which he has not even been accused of. Who is the murderer?Astonishing, is not it?You can prepare the lunch or dinner during the viewing of this movie. You have not to follow the story, because you already know how it will end. And concerning the real murderer, who cares?