Blucher
One of the worst movies I've ever seen
Ogosmith
Each character in this movie — down to the smallest one — is an individual rather than a type, prone to spontaneous changes of mood and sometimes amusing outbursts of pettiness or ill humor.
filippaberry84
I think this is a new genre that they're all sort of working their way through it and haven't got all the kinks worked out yet but it's a genre that works for me.
Taha Avalos
The best films of this genre always show a path and provide a takeaway for being a better person.
pkneer
Any super hero movie needs 3 things - a good script/story, good acting, and great CGI. This movie had none of these things. The only actor that did a decent job was Ezra Miller as The Flash, all the others were truly horrible and stiff. The story was lame and the attempts at humor fell flat 90% of the time. The scenes did not flow, no continuity. Finally, the CGI was by far the worst of any hero movie I've seen in years. The bad guy, Steppenwolf, looked like stepped right out of a video game. I give it a rating of 4/10 solely on the better action scenes. I am baffled how Marvel can do these films so well and DC so poorly.
Joe
I guess this is that movie that has been so easy for people to just throw pelters at it. If anything, it's been incredible the reaction against but also some of the support also. Let's be honest much of the criticism is also due to the rivalry faction of DC fans v Marvel fans, and i can't be bothered with all that.Anyhow, as for this, I am much in the centre. Having only just watched the film I thought that there was actually a lot to commend it for, but yes there are some flaws. Lighter in note than either "Man of Steel" of "Batman V Superman", it's more accessible. Characters are a good mixture and entertaining, and I really warmed to them. I thought Aquaman stole the show but The Flash was also excellent. Humour was good and simple. So much to like and it all keeps your attention.Flaws? Well, the story could have been better and Wonder Woman actress Gal Gadot really can't act or hold the screen. The villain just wasn't strong enough but thankfully wasn't a simple copy of Marvel. The final battle was confusing, not sure how it was all resolved. Also what's the point of Lois Lane in these films? She's been terrible used, or just simply the wrong actress. Just not convinced.Despite those criticisms, don't get me wrong, it's a fine enough tentpole film. Most critics have gone over the top, and personally I think it's incredible that this has taken as much flak as it has when a number of far inferior Marvel movies have been given an easy ride in comparison (e.g. Avengers 2).It's a watchable and enjoyable film. Deserves more breathing space, and really it's a fine evening out. The series will evolve and improve, especially with new directors in line, so should be interesting.
justenpittman
Fun, would watch again, Affleck's aging batman was commendable, Momoa's Aquaman was excellent
starsteamer
Okay, I'm a bit late to the party as I've not seen Batman vs Superman. But Affleck is a terrible Batman. Like, a really terrible Batman. As the character is pivotal to this movie, it caused a major problem for me.
The other characters/ actors are all pretty good. The plot is completely cliched, but hey, it's a superhero movie so that's expected. But Batman. The worst actor out of all of the Batmen. Worse than I could've even expected.
On the plus side, Cavell is a great Superman.