Kansas City Confidential

1952 "The Crime That Shocked The Nation!"
7.3| 1h40m| NR| en
Details

An ex-convict sets out to uncover who framed him for an armored car robbery.

Director

Producted By

Associated Players & Producers

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 30-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Spidersecu Don't Believe the Hype
Dorathen Better Late Then Never
Zandra The movie turns out to be a little better than the average. Starting from a romantic formula often seen in the cinema, it ends in the most predictable (and somewhat bland) way.
Stephanie There is, somehow, an interesting story here, as well as some good acting. There are also some good scenes
Idiot-Deluxe "Alright you two knuckle-head's, now you're gonna listen to me. Unless you wanna join the guns in the well."Kansas City Confidential is an terrifically well-crafted Film Noir, starring John Payne (in the lead-role), Lee Van Cleef, Preston Foster, Jack Elam and the angelically beautiful Coleen Gray. The films plot is quite simply fantastic, an ingenious, though not fool-proof, heist (a bank robbery of 1.2 million dollars) and the gangs subsequent rondevu in Mexico a month later where the loot is to be divided. But things don't go as planned and what unfolds is a gripping Film Noir of intriguing complexity, full of twists and turns and betrayals - as crooked crook's conspire against. Preston Foster's character is the mastermind behind the crime, whose meticulous planning and execution is all for not, upended by the persistence of "Joe Rolfe" (John Payne); who rightly feels scorned for being set up as the fall-guy for the crime. John Payne delivers one of his best performances in this film, deftly out-witting and/or over-powering his opposition (oily gangsters in fedora's) in a tangled web of encounters that run the gamut, from seedy hotel's, to back alley's, to airport terminals, to chic, palm-shaded, bungalow's in the tropics. As mentioned above this classic and seemingly under-rated Film Noir has many slippery moments, that which routinely revolve around deceit and betrayal. But the part of the film's plot I like best, is the way Joe Rolfe assumes the identity of the recently departed Pete Harris - one of the masked men who pulled off the bank heist - once that happens things get real complicated for all involved. Complicated, that's the word that most deftly describes the plot and the ensuing developments to follow.One must mention a detail that's very important to the films plot, one which essentially shapes the entire movie, which is the fact that all crooks who were in on the robbery wore masks the entire time and in doing so NO ONE, other other then mainman Tim Foster, knows the identities of their fellow partners in crime (therefore they're "stool pigeon-proof"). As instructed they're to identify themselves at the rondevu, by presenting their half of a playing card which had been torn in two by the bossman - without that ripped card they don't get their cut of the loot. That's the key reason why this film works so well, as it creates an air of uncertainty among thieves and crooks; and when one considers this films elite cast of wise-guys, this inevitably means lot's of scenes with oily crooks shooting each other lot's of looks, from across smoke-filled rooms, in the form of acidic, distrustful, sneers and lot's of close-up's of inquisitively squinty eyes, as they feel each other out, trying to pick each others brains. So in other words, this film has a lot of great poker-faces.Once in Mexico the full cast is quickly and effectively fleshed out, particularly so in the case of Tony Romano (Van Cleef's character) a slick, big-spending, ladies man, who, as you'll see, is driven entirely by greed (even more-so then his accomplices). I find Van Cleef's performance in Kansas City Confidential to be among the best of his earlier roles, constantly squinting, sneering and smoking, perfectly cast, his sense of villainy translates palpably from the screen and is easily my favorite character of the film. That's another thing, as you'll see, virtually all the main characters are constantly smoking cigarettes and/or lighting cigarettes (very common in films from the 50's and Film Noir's in general) - the cast smokes like a series of chimneys. Watch with both amazement and amusement when Van Cleef won't give up his cigarette, even when John Payne puts him in a headlock, twists his arm behind his back and points a revolver to his head - now that's one dedicated smoker and he continues to calmly puff away, dropping it only when he has a gun forcibly thrust into his neck.To further complicate Mr. Foster's plans and the films plot as a whole, his gorgeous young daughter "Helen" (a 20-something and lawyer in the making) unexpectedly and certainly unannounced comes to visit him at the very same seaside resort, where he (in disguise as a fisherman) and all the crooks have gathered. She quickly takes a liking to Joe Rolfe and amid their playful flirting a romance is budding and soon to bloom, but her father wisely try's to steer her away from him - for multiple reasons. She even unwittingly saves his life on one occasion, during a "very warm conversion" once his cover has been blown. Seeing no possible recourse Foster try's and nearly succeeds in pulling a double-cross, in a seemingly legit way, which as a reward, would still allow him to line his pockets. This culminates in a scene marked by deadly betrayal and a fight to the death, aboard a certain fishing boat that plays into Foster's newly laid plan; but yet again luck is not with him and a bloodbath ensues, where only one can emerge as the victor. Ultimately I find Kansas City Confidential to be mighty compelling viewing, with a great cast and a witty, complex plot.
Mac Mcleod The performance of the actors in this movie is very strong- comparable to modern standards with subtle moments of shifting emotions well displayed on their faces, a complex plot with characters who have more depth than they get in many films like this. All have their own motivations and none are simple stereotypes.The action is also creative and surprising with some actions taken which I've never seen in a movie before.I suspect that the director has something to do with the uniformity of the excellent performances by the cast. In the case of Jack Elam, his work here was extremely strong and he wasn't alone.Production values are nothing spectacular but don't distract.I'm going to look for other works by this director. I think this is a gem among movies in this period and budget range.
milam_ogden I decided to review this film noir today because it is opening at the Film Noir festival in San Francisco. I own a copy and usually watch it once a year. I have watched it seven (7) times over the last ten years.Phil Karlson directs and utilized a variety of actors who are recognizable in the film noir genre. These include: John Payne, Coleen Gray, Preston Foster, Neville Brand, Jack Elam and Lee Van Cleef. The plot gets complicated in Mexico because Foster's daughter (i.e Coleen Grey) falls for the anti-hero Joe Rolfe (John Payne).The plot is multi-layered and involves all the major actors. Justice prevails after a number of plot twists in a sleepy, isolated resort in Mexico.
Thomas Drufke I know a lot of people are against remakes of any sort, but I think Kansas City Confidential is one of the few classic films that are hard to argue against remaking. With an updated and star studded cast it can be a possible Oscar contender. Film Noir's just aren't really made anymore and I can totally see someone like Ben Foster or Michael Fassbender taking on these roles. But don't get me wrong, the film doesn't need to be remade. The original 1952 crime drama is fantastic. Not only is it utterly suspenseful but the performances across the board are flawless. The actors make the unlikable characters hard to root against and that's an extremely difficult thing to do, especially when you're dealing with murder and bank robberies. The film tells the story of a perfect bank robbery done by 4 troubled men, and then the framed man who wouldn't give up.I love the mysterious beginning. Sure, you know who is truly behind all of it from the get-go, but the film does a great job of creating cryptic characters and let the story unfold without interruption. At first I found the film to be hard to follow considering some of the main characters look similar in black and white, but after 20 minutes or so I was sucked in. When the tables start to turn for each character, the film elevates to a whole other level. One of the best scenes in the film is the poker match. It reminded me a lot of The Departed where each character thinks he is starting to understand exactly who everyone else is, only it's just the beginning. I had wondered throughout the entire film which one of these characters would come out on top. Or better yet, who would crack first and go to the cops.I think the only part of the film that fell short was the romance. I feel like Joe and Helena weren't developed enough as a couple for the relationship to blossom that fast. The film needed a few more female characters. I think if they ever do remake the film they could totally have one of the main bank robbers be a female. But I guess the time period just didn't have a lot of female roles to go around.+Performances +Utterly suspenseful +That poker match though...+Unpredictable -Lack of female presence 9.0/10