IslandGuru Who payed the critics

RipDelight This is a tender, generous movie that likes its characters and presents them as real people, full of flaws and strengths.

Lollivan It's the kind of movie you'll want to see a second time with someone who hasn't seen it yet, to remember what it was like to watch it for the first time.

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

richard6 With special relevance against the current political backdrop of the Russian annexation of the Crimea, Haytarma is a compelling Ukrainian/Crimean produced short-film about the forcible deportation of the Crimean Tatars by Soviet authorities in 1944. Based on true events, the film stylishly portrays the story of a young ethnic Crimean Tatar test pilot (Sultan) and his efforts to protect his family from the unexpected brutal deportation.The film starring-point is soon after Crimea liberation from three-years of destructive Nazi occupation. Sultan returns home to visit his relatives, coinciding with the Commissar of State Security decree to harshly punish by deportation, based on lavish collective collaboration charges, all Crimean Tatars to Central Asia. A race historically regarded as anti-Soviet by its Moscow crony masters. A Ukrainian Crimean independent television channel produced and financed film. Given the pungent politically situation, the film aims a scattering of jingoism directed as a slap in the face to its Russian neighbours. Generally, Haytarma will be appreciated by eager historical nuts and cherished by nationalistic Ukrainians and ethnic Tatars. Yet, haply attention and interest will be recognised by mainstream international theatre audiences or DVD viewers. In short, Haytarma is a deeply moving patriotic film, visualising tales, revision told, lived and experienced by a population nations parents' and grandparents' to the present generation; yet a true-story not unappreciated by non-nationals of this geographical location. The film is historically genuine, historically accurate and admirably depicts the identity of the people and national characteristics. Even though, hefty questions still require riposte, and answers are still debated and disputed regarding the forcible deportation, carefully, though the film is neither over patriotic or aloft Russophobic.Haytarma is a short film, ending unexpectedly with a loose conclusion. Yet, the story is griping and historical faultless. A crime against humanity? Or a state security requisite? Neither should distract against the quality of this short-film.

Kirpianuscus a film who could represent , for many viewers, an enigma. because it reflects a moment from a long history of a people. because it propose the end of a fight. because it has as receiver the public who knows the past of Crimean Tatars and only rediscovers the pain, the injustice, the cruelty of a decision who remains uncured. the case of Amehdan is only a crumb from the tragic deportation of one of populations from Soviet Union. and only the music, the slices of tradition, the scenes from village and the wedding remands the specificity of drama. that fact transforms the film only in homage to the families - victims under Stalin's regime. and that could be its error. and virtue. because , as start point for research, Khaytarma could be useful. not only for understand the tragedy of Tatar's deportation. but for understand a system for who the people are only details. in many occasions, insignificant details. Khaytarma is a beautiful film. and a touching homage. but, more important, it is a warning. as each testimony about the pain from the past.

Armand piece of a long chain. remember, homage, testimony. about one of crimes from recent history. after the annexation of Crimeea by Russia, the film becomes a kind of manifesto. because it represents more than a case, first Crimeean Tatar film, a beautiful - the music has a huge role - to present a tragedy who has many another sides , many same dates for Armenians, Romanians from North Bucovina or Bassarabia, for Kurds and Jews so, it is not only a bitter story but occasion for discover the evil traces in the XX century. its great virtue is wise science of small details use. a young director who has courage and wisdom to present his community story. that is all. a film like a stop of time. who has not the ambition to impress but to be tool for not forget. because this story is, in profound sense, one of stories of each spectator of film.

dwpbike i'm being generous with the "4". while the movie has gorgeous video, there simply is no plot, no story line. i'm thinking the version i watched in ukrainian, but could have been Russian. regardless, i really saw no story or plot unfolding. i should add their were no subtitles. this is usually no problem when watching Chinese movies. some things are self evident and Chinese movies are so heavy with melodrama that you are saying "enough already" before the conclusion.my interest in the movie is because my father in law is ukrainian. he is not from crimea, but i pick up knowledge of the country in bits and pieces. while i can deduce that soviet authorities are directing the expulsion of these people, i am told nothing of who the people are, their history, what is the cause of the expulsion, etc. the movie did encourage me to google, where i find the population is Muslim and the russians have some proof that they were nazi collaborators. as confusing and complex as ukraine is, i know further research won't yield an answer of one side being "right". the movie offers no help in that respect.