Titreenp SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?

SpuffyWeb Sadly Over-hyped

BroadcastChic Excellent, a Must See

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

susanmariesabo Oh wow, this "documentary" is really just a couple of hours of self-indulgence. Made by the same man who made "Cropsey" (which was ok), this film purports to reveal the origins behind 4 urban legends. The facts are sparse because it's not a real documentary. So the time is filled with visiting old locations where literally nothing else happens, telling innocent residents that their homes were formerly occupied by killers, and a plodding, uninteresting, downright irritating narration that I suppose is supposed to sound menacing but comes off as ridiculous and heavy-handed. If you're really into urban legends, your time would be way better spent at Wikipedia. This "film" is dull, uninspired, and boring.

gil-191-414728 I really enjoyed this piece! Rachel Mills and Joshua Zeman do an excellent job of examining several urban legends and the crimes that may have inspired them. I would really like to see them turn this into a series that explores true crimes and studies the twisting of the facts by the general public. Rachel and Joshua take a first person role in examining the facts and perceptions surrounding several high profile murders that spawned or at the very least bolstered urban legends such as the man with the hook, the babysitter and the caller and 'killer clown'. Their objective look at these is very believable and I think would do well in an ongoing examination of other high profile crimes and how facts get twisted in the retelling.

butaneggbert Man, I wanted this to be good. The study of urban legends is so fascinating, and the right approach would dig into all their social underpinnings and (the point of this movie, apparently) how they might have evolved from true-life events.But this ego-driven mess (I won't call it a "documentary", which would dishonor the craft) isn't really about urban legends. It's about two wanna-be sociologists throwing every horror movie trope they can think of onto the screen.Eerie lighting: check.Contrived, faux-spontaneous conversations: check.Heavy-handed, non-professional narration: check."Oh oh the monster is creeping up!" music under EVERY scene: check.Meanwhile they do their best to look like serious researchers, but the avalanche of illogical leaps and unsubstantiated conclusions keeps giving them away.It's only mockable up to a point, then it turns truly ugly. When you're going to linger on explicit photographs of actual torture and murder victims, respect is essential. But because this is merely the cartoon of an "investigation", these shots come off as lascivious exploitation. I feel for any family members who come upon this movie.Unwatchable. I turned it off.

indigo-silhouette I was actually pleased someone had the idea to produce this film. Urban legends are all around us, and some really do have a "real life" basis.The Phantom Killer was the basis for The Hook, Halloween candy tampering and poisoning ( yes, it's happened....with a real case proving it (Candy Man), baby sitter murders ( remember Black Christmas?), and Killer Clowns (John Wayne Gacy). Even Cropsy is mentioned briefly.I think many urban legends are, as they suggest here, not only stories that warn us that bad things can happen; they are also created to help us cope with real evil in the world.The film is shot as a documentary, which it is. It combines many facts, which, over time, blurred that fine line of fact into fiction. Great legendary serial killers, such as Zodiac (the original one in San Francisco) will eventually turn into the urban legends we know and shudder to.I only wish they would make this into a series. Good job!