mraculeated
The biggest problem with this movie is it’s a little better than you think it might be, which somehow makes it worse. As in, it takes itself a bit too seriously, which makes most of the movie feel kind of dull.
MisterWhiplash
This will sound like a minor complaint but this is something that bugged me about this documentary... why did Peter Berg have to converse with Wayne Gretzky on a golf course? I understand the latter probably plays it and maybe Berg (not, most likely) wanted to get him in a calm environment, but it doesn't come off as something that feels right considering the subject matter: a tale of greed and loss and 15 million dollars (also draft picks) for Edmonton's "Great One" to leave in 1988 for LA. It seems off that a story that is all about how a man who felt conflicted but went for the change from working-class Oilers to the hoity-toity Hollywood-elite level of the Kings (or at least that was the fan-base seemingly at first) has the backdrop in some part of an activity that is for the upper-crust and well-off.This isn't to say the movie wouldn't be worthwhile if they were picking through trash or something (on the far extreme of the otherwise). There's a compelling narrative here that is hampered mostly by it being too short (it was done as the first of a long, massively successful series of 1-hour documentaries about sports by a variety of directors for ESPN): what happened for Gretzky, who had been playing through the 80's for the Edmonton Oilers and, along with the likes of Mark Messier, making one of THE major hockey teams that went to win four Stanley Cups (the last in 1988 when this deal took place), to go to the Los Angeles Kings? Berg's depiction of the story is fair and balanced as far as looking at the many sides: the former owner of the Oilers (who was beset by money issues as the team, while noted for Gretzky, wasn't as successful as a major city team like the Kings or, the last team he played for, the NY Rangers), the former owner of the Kings (who had his own extremely shady business dealings, which comes out in the final text crawl at the end), and the former coach of the Oilers (to say the least he said he never got emotional, but certainly did when news came to him of a deal being made to trade Gretzky).A lot of it came down to economics, but one of the things that sticks out is when Gretzky - faced right before with the point by the owner of the Oilers "if you don't want to do this you don't have to" (maybe passive aggressive, maybe not) - has the press conference to announce his decision. He fights back tears and finally lets go and can barely say a word. It's the hardest part to watch in the movie, though the point is brought up by an interviewee that this might have not been genuine, that Gretzky was really an ego-maniac. The various clips of Edmonton fans reacting to the move to LA is rather wild; one minute we see this city rally around this team because of this player as if it was like a gigantic communal church (tickets were said to sometimes go for as much as 5,000, though the former owner says they usually just paid between 20 and 40 dollars, odd contradiction but there you go and speaks to the money problems the team might've had), and then the next they go so far as to call Gretzky's then new wife Janet Jones the "Yoko of hockey", like she would pull him from one team to another. Wow.The story is inherently captivating, but I wish it was better presented. Berg's editing style is to have a lot of time-lapse shots of LA and other things, and to have rapidly cut montages whether it's with the Oilers or in LA. It's never bad exactly but it's uninspired. And it really deserved, or deserves, a longer treatment: what happens really when Gretzky gets to LA and plays with them? We hear tidbits from the Great One about how the team wasn't as good and he had to pull extra of his own weight, and that they only made it to the cup finals once, but I'm sure where was more intriguing material to explore. The people who are interviewed - golf course confessionals included - make this worth a watch, especially for hockey followers, but I wish it had received a larger treatment and with less "flash" and "pizazz" that seems contradictory to the story being told about green and ego... or if it's meant to compliment that, it falls flat.
MartinHafer
This is the first episode of ESPN's "30 for 30" film series. I appreciated it not just because it was well-crafted (as usual) but because I learned a lot about the Wayne Gretzky move to Los Angeles. At the time, back in 1988, there were LOTS of rumors about why he left Edmonton and went to LA and I assumed, like many folks, it was because he wanted to be in Los Angeles because that's where his new wife had been living. Not so! Instead, the story goes a little deeper but boils down to his leaving because he found out the team was negotiating to trade him. In other words, he had no intention on leaving until the team started discussing the possibility of a trade. Now on the team's behalf, I could also understand why they did this--after all, Edmonton was a smaller market and would have trouble paying a mega-super star's salary when he contract came up for renewal.Using interviews with all the parties involved (even including Mrs. Gretzky), the filmmakers did a fine job all around and it's a film that hockey fans should not miss.
Michael_Elliott
30 at 30: King's Ransom (2009) *** (out of 4) The first film in ESPN's series has director Peter Berg taking a look at the 1988 trade that sent Wayne Gretzky from the Edmonton Oilers to the Los Angeles Kings. This trade is considered to be the biggest in sports history as the Edmonton owner got around $15 million in cash and sent the entire face of hockey packing bags, which causes him countless death threats from the people in Edmonton. The documentary takes a look at both sides of the trade and shows what impact it had on the cities moving forward. Gretzky is in the film and gives his thoughts and feelings on the trade years after it all went down and it's interesting to hear him say he wouldn't change a thing considering he wouldn't win another Stanley Cut but the team he left would win another two years after the trade. No one will ever question the greatness of Gretzky but I do wonder if he's telling the truth here when he said he wouldn't do anything over. The two owners are also interviewed and you can't help but understand why the trade was done even though fans are still going to cry foul. Berg does a very nice job at getting all the details out there and this includes new interviews as well as the original news conference as well as other footage from various stations covering the event.
