CommentsXp Best movie ever!

Benas Mcloughlin Worth seeing just to witness how winsome it is.

Kirandeep Yoder The joyful confection is coated in a sparkly gloss, bright enough to gleam from the darkest, most cynical corners.

Cody One of the best movies of the year! Incredible from the beginning to the end.

TMKluski Buster just wanted every dog to be free, I do not know what is wrong with that. Two little doggies were way too young for a relationship. Making babies like crazy is NOT the answer.

OllieSuave-007 Much of the Disney sequels do not compare to the magic, charm and imagination of the originals and this one is no exception. When you're watching these sequels, sometimes you are left missing the original even more because. even though there is a little bit of nostalgia, the sequel doesn't bring back the quality of the original.Yet, for this movie, there are some memorable characters, great animation, charming songs and a quick-paced plot, where we get to see Lady and the Tramp's son Scamp, tired of rules he has to follow at home, yearn for the out yonder life and decides to join a carefree group of junkyard dogs.There is really nothing original in the film and the two title characters, Lady and the Tramp, are not in the movie much. The plot is rushed, which made little room for character development. However, the chemistry between Scamp and Angel was somewhat nice, and the overall family importance theme is touching.Overall, this film is nice for the kids to enjoy, but adults would probably stick with the original.Grade C+

Bethany Lawrence Lady and the Tramp II is one of the Disney sequels which I keep as "okay" in my books. They could have done a lot worse (like what they did with The Little Mermaid sequel..horrible!) and this one stands as being a pretty okay sequel. Some problems about this sequel are the totally rushed and not needed romance between Angel and Scamp. It was tasteless and bland, the duet they share was sweet but did not compare to Bella Notte from the first film. I also did not like what they did with Tramps character development. Like Simba in Lion King 2, they turned him from a fun loving adult to a cold, serious parent. Tramp used to be a very lovable character in the first film, chasing chickens and avoiding dogcatchers. But what does he say when Scamp runs through the lounge with a pillow in his jaws? "Now come on son, you're gonna make a mess!' It's just unfamiliar of our old Disney characters to change personality so quickly. Lady had little to no dialogue, which is a sad change from the first film where we learned so much about her. But all in all, it's an alright sequel. Learning about Tramp's past was interesting and the film still kept some of the old settings from the original. Disney fans should see, but if you are not a Lady and the Tramp fan, this may not appeal to you.

William Webber Where do I begin? Walt Disney's happiest motion picture "Lady and the Tramp" is one of, if not possibly, my favourite in the theatrical canon of Disney animation. The sequel, however, is... to say the very least, enjoyable. I enjoyed myself throughout the whole movie. It was, (flame-shield up!) adorable! The Broadway style of the songs and the movie kind of worked, and I was humming the songs for the rest of the night. I can, if you asked me to, still sing all of the songs.But where the movie was (really) good for me, it was bad in a lot of other places. The animation was kind of scary at times. Every time there was a close up shot of someones face, I don't know... it just seemed scary to me. Also, where the hell was Lady? She gets like two lines of dialogue and only doggy hugs Scamp at the end. She gets 0% interaction with the plot and her only son!But all in all, I liked it. Compared to the original does it hold up? No. The songs aren't as good (still kind of catchy though), the plot was a lot less involved, Lady had almost nothing to do with it, and it's not as cute as the first one. But, if you go in with an open mind, you'll have fun, and maybe 'gasp!' Like it?