Linbeymusol Wonderful character development!

IslandGuru Who payed the critics

Redwarmin This movie is the proof that the world is becoming a sick and dumb place

CrawlerChunky In truth, there is barely enough story here to make a film.

dromasca It's 50 years almost day-to-day since the Red Army and the armies of several "fraternal" states invaded the Czechoslovak Socialist Republic and put an end to the experiment of socialism with a human face that had been tried by Alexander Dubcek and the Czechoslovak Communist leadership. I do not know whether it is a coincidence or not, but the timing was excellent for the screening and viewing of Jiri Mendel's 1969 film 'Skrivánci na niti' ('Larks on a String') as part of the Czech film festival in Israel, a film that could not meet with its audience for 20 years, as it was banned by the communist censorship until the fall of the regime. For the audience in my native Romania who lived during communism, Mendel's film will not only show themes and situations similar to those they lived, but its fate will remind the one of the film 'Reconstituirea' ('Reconstitution') made in the same period in Romania by Lucian Pintilie: The same attitude of protest and resistance, the same subtle symbolism, the same sympathetic approach to the characters, and ultimately a similar fate - the film was banned by censorship and kept 'on the shelves' for twenty years. The action in 'Skrivánci na niti' is placed in time in the early 1950s when the Communist dictatorship began to consolidate and 'class enemies' were sent to forced labor or prison for the guilt of having belonged to the 'bourgeois classes' or for the crime of trying to escape from the 'socialist paradise'. The setting is symbolic - a plant where industrial waste is brought to be transformed into useful objects, and the people who robot are the human waste that needs to be re-educated to become the 'new type of human beings'. Those who turn out to be non-educated disappear, arrested by the political police and forced into the car that will lead them to more severe prison or labor camps, the next stage of repression. Unlike Lucian Pintilie's Romanian film, which was an exception, Jiri Mendel's creation was part of a more developed cinema school, with creators like Milos Forman, Vera Chytilová or Mendel, who managed to create several remarkable films demonstrating that - within the limits of the communist censorship tolerance - making quality films was possible even behind the Iron Curtain. The look that Mendel throws back in those years of relative hope for Eastern Europe toward the beginning of the communist era is not characterized by anger or hatred. The characters of the period are presented in their humanity, even the prison guardians or the bureaucrats of the regime are surprised in situations that make them ridiculous rather than abject. Criticism is especially directed against the system, with all its power to oppress and is absurdity worthy of Kafka's country. Visual power and acting are remarkable. Jiri Mendel's film made half-century ago, has successfully passed the exam of time.

Emil Bakkum Seeing the film "Larks on a string" is one of those surprises, that make life pleasant. It reminds of the famous Charlie Chaplin film "Modern times", so need I say more? The main characters run the risk of being crushed by the anonymous system, but they are somehow saved by their decent nature. Indeed "Larks on a string" ends with the incitement to "find yourself". Still it is not a banal remake of "Modern times". In fact the many stereotypes and the surrealistic scenery (mainly a depot for disposed metals) remind of the Monty Python shows. The film was banned by the Leninist state, and therefore western spectators tend to assume that it must be critical about the system. However, this is not self-evident. Remember that the state financed its production in the first place! Indeed the scripts of Leninist films are often critical, but they target the human nature, and not the system! On the other hand in this case the narrative is truly atrabilious in its view on society. The only decent people appear to be the outcasts, the caught fugitives, and surprisingly the president. The president is unworldly, and seems to miss out on what happens around him. In fact his attitude is rather confounding, for without him the film would be just a criticism of the former Stalinist regime. The scenes of the prison camp (including barracks with straw mattresses, barbed wire and watch towers), the security police and the prison guards are depressing. Fortunately they are ridiculed in a Chaplin-Monty-like way, which is quite funny. For instance the guard falls in love with a picture of an angle and two children. The propaganda officer has glasses like saucers. The pioneer leader shows the fugitives to her class, and sighs: "The fascist beast never sleeps!" The little pioneers themselves try to tie red scarfs around the necks of the outcasts. The security officers drive around in an old nazist luxury car, and they seem to be everywhere. The outcasts are transported to the railway station in order to cheer the visiting president. The trade-union leader puts on a cap, when he enters the mill. There is a moving scene, when the fugitives and outcasts form a chain and hand on what appears to be cartridge shells. And of course there is the Chaplin-like innocent love affair between a fugitive and an outcast. Since she is imprisoned, they marry "by proxy" (a find of the local party official). In short, "Larks on a string" is recommended warmly. In order to really appreciate the mockery, you might consider seeing a "serious" Leninist film. For instance, "Spur der Steine". There are plenty among my reviews. And don't forget to comment, I love it!

Red-125 The Czech film Skrivánci na niti was shown in the United States with the title, Larks on a String (1990). The release date should really be 1969/1990. Writer-director Jirí Menzel completed the film in 1969. The Prague Spring was crushed by Soviet tanks in 1968. Possibly Menzel thought that some trace of the cultural liberation remained, but that clearly wasn't the case. The film wasn't officially released until after the Velvet Revolution freed Czechoslovakia from Soviet domination.The plot of the movie revolves around two groups of political outcasts. The Larks on a String are women prisoners who have received one-year prison sentences for attempting to escape from Czechoslovakia. They are working in a junk yard, where they can see a group of men working who are being "rehabilitated." I think the men were not actually considered prisoners. They had been guilty of "bourgeois activities," and were sent to the junk yard as a type of punishment. While they weren't larks on a string, they lived and worked under definite restrictions.One restriction that members of both groups suffered was the inability to interact closely with members of the other group. They could see each other, signal each other, and shout to each other. However, that was all they could do.The women didn't appear to have any process for complaining about their conditions. As I understood it, the men were still considered workers, and so they had channels through which to complain. The problem was that anyone who complained too much ended up in jail. This was definitely not a worker's paradise.In this movie people are endlessly trying to relate, being caught, being punished, and then trying again. In a way it's a frustrating, discouraging movie. But, in another way, it's a credit to the characters in the film--and to the people of Czechoslovakia--that they continued to struggle and never lost hope.We saw this movie at the Lincoln Film Forum, as part of the excellent Romanian Film Festival. (The Romanian Festival screens some movies from other Eastern European countries.) The movie should work well on the small screen. It's a great film-- find it and see it.

Ilpo Hirvonen Before Larks on a String, Jiri Menzel had made his most famous film Closely Watched Trains (1966) which even won an Oscar for Best Foreign Film. Larks on a String wasn't such a big success because it was immediately banned in 1969 when it was made. The new fresh waves that came to Czechoslovakia in the 1960's made the making of the film possible and it was made in the spirit of the revolution -- The Prague Spring in 1968. Even that Menzel has always been a humanist as an artist his views were this time too much for the communist politicians and therefore he got a five-year prohibition for making movies; and Larks on a String wasn't released until the fall of communism in 1990.I have had the privilege to see this wonderfully absurd film twice on the television. It is a warm-hearted story about an industrial scrap yard where "volunteers" produce cheap steel. In this yard a group of volunteers are being re-educated from their filthy bourgeois lives to loyal workers in the name of socialism. The group includes a musician, a philosopher, a dairyman, a barber, a prosecutor and a young chef. On the other side of the yard there is a group of female prisoners who are working for trying to defect. Without the strict rules, boundaries and supervision, romantic relationships start to build between these characters.In Larks on a String Menzel achieves to relay his view on the poetry of life. But the lyricism of the film is characterized by bitter irony because reality, hypocrisy and cruelty of the society exhale from the director's comedy. The entire scrap yard is, of course, a sarcastic metaphor for the experimentations of the East-European countries. The former enemies are being re-educated into common workers and from the trash of the old world a new society is built. But nothing is real: people are arrested for obscure reasons, the secret police controls everything and even the qualification of the steel is poor. However, even in these conditions people are people and they try to make the most of it.The Czechoslovakian New Wave found its inspiration from France but also from their own greatest writer Franz Kafka. In turn, they gave inspiration for many modern filmmakers. During the Hungarian Revolution in 1956, a Marxist philosopher called Georg Lukács said that "Kafka was a realist" after all. It is an important observation while reading Kafka but also works as the main thesis for the entire Czechoslovakian New Wave: because wasn't fierce, ruthless humor really the only way to deal with the absurdity of being in the Communist countries of Eastern Europe? Therefore, we shouldn't just watch Larks on a String as an absurd tragicomedy because this was real -- and that's why we can call it realism for its goals and bases which were both social. Even though the film portrays human fates, crushed by the repressive governance, the film is also full of joy, love and mundane beauty.