Pluskylang Great Film overall

ScoobyMint Disappointment for a huge fan!

Gurlyndrobb While it doesn't offer any answers, it both thrills and makes you think.

Ortiz Excellent and certainly provocative... If nothing else, the film is a real conversation starter.

Jimgaddis I just rented "Lost" from iTunes for $.99. Can I have my 99 cents and 90 minutes back? Yes it's "Phonebooth" + "Duel" + a few other bad movies I can't put my finger on right now. And CHEAP! Looks likely was shot in two days for about $1000.Voiceovers by Danny Trejo and somebody (my guess is the writer of this travesty) doing ALL of the other voices ( radio & TV voiceovers, "audio guru", even the VERY bad hysterical Mexican woman) Ludicrous writing. NO production values. NO character development. NO suspense. Also, there aren't that many roads in the entire state of Nevada! And the ridiculous road and place names sounded like the writer was sitting in his apartment in Santa Barbera ( where the story starts) and just picked random cul-de-sac names from his posh housing development! C'mon, guy! Do a LITTLE research before you kill an entire weekend banging out a script! At least pretend to strive for a teeny bit of authenticity! I won't say I'm disappointed because this is just the kind of crap I would expect to see Dean Cain in.

rboy8 i really wanted to enjoy this movie. it started out with a nice premise and as it unspooled, it just ended up a bungled mess of celluloid on the floor. when i found out the lead was actually involved in a bank heist, i became very interested until the actual robbery was revealed. that is what took all of the air out of this tire. what was the lead really thinking? he helps criminals rob a bank that he works at and attempts to take half the money instead of the agreed upon 5%. his plan is that he will disappear while the bad guys get caught. what?????? first of all, if they are apprehended, don't you think that they would be happy to implicate this idiot to gain revenge? and what was this lead truly thinking? the minute the robbery is committed, he and his fellow employee vanish with the loot. oh yeah. he's gonna take a plane to somewhere and will never get caught. just move to a secret place with his photo and description plastered all over the media. with a wife and kid in tow. yeah. right. sorry......i know the guy was in over his head financially, but that does not mean he could pull off something so thin and flimsy. plus on top of everything else he never thought to have several escape routes just in case so he gets........lost. wonderful, i guess there would have been no story if he had actually used his head. bah

MrsClarenceWorley This film is a low budget wonder! It may not have had the budget to pursue its potential 100% but it is fantastic and definitely better than most large studio productions."Lost" is a film spawned from the fundamental and most crucial aspects of film-making: good acting and good writing. Most big-budget Hollywood films rely heavily upon the star system (the popularity and "pull-power" of its cast)and upon multi-million dollar advertising campaigns. "Lost" relies on neither of these superficial aspects, and is a far better film for it. Using but a select few actors, the film carries a story that is both entertaining and enthralling. The end was an unexpected surprise and the movie, in its entirety, introduced and explored several moral themes which provided a lot of food for thought. The main character, played by Dean Cain, was the type of person that we could all relate to and his actions in the film were VERY pertinent to anyone and everyone watching the film. All of these factors made the film quite enjoyable.Like I said in the very beginning, the one and ONLY aspect lacking in this film was a larger budget. But regardless of that detail, the film's impressive script and great acting performances made it thoroughly entertaining!

bobbyhonea all in all it was a pretty good flick,but a few questions need to be addressed;first off he was driving a brand new something perhaps a BMW i dunno couldn't really tell, but he did run low on fuel and had to stop and fill up,but later when he was driving the 1980,81 ford f-150 p.u. gas was no longer an issue.(i drove one of those gas hogs for years),and his ran pretty damn good for $500; 2.if archer was such a good Apache tracker why couldn't he see the rush cover-up job that Stanton did with his tire tracks in the sand when he hid behind the billboard? i mean the apache man did see a cigarette butt on the highway while doing 70!; 3. how in the hell did archer figure out he was using g.p.s. and Judy at that? but in the end i thought she was working with the feds and was leading him into a trap for a reward.