Stellead Don't listen to the Hype. It's awful

Majorthebys Charming and brutal

Rio Hayward All of these films share one commonality, that being a kind of emotional center that humanizes a cast of monsters.

Mehdi Hoffman There's a more than satisfactory amount of boom-boom in the movie's trim running time.

Martin Pronk GREAT STORY! Love Everlasting was engaging and heartfelt from the start. It's a classic love story with some unique twists and turns. Lucky Blue Smith in his first film was amazing. The entire film was well cast with some very inspiring performances. The comic relief in the film was perfect. It was shot and edited beautifully. It's tastefully done. I highly recommend this film.

castercasting Sadly, this "film" was just disappointing. I was hoping it would be decent but it was not well done. The cinematography was good but the poor direction and poor story greatly overshadowed that. I was wondering if this was Rob diamonds "directorial" debut, but sadly it isn't. The goal is to get better, not worse. I hate saying such things but films like this are what's dragging down the film Industry. If this continues no ones going to want to go to a movie or the quality of films will decline. I don't want that to happen. Again, I'm sorry for telling the truth but someone needs to. I hope somehow he gets better. keep it up.

chrissparreboom The trailer itself gave a "hot guy falls for shy girl" vibe, so that's what I had in mind when I started watching the film. And I was right! Not only were the plot lines very, very predictable, but the fact that there was no chemistry between the leading actors made the kissing scenes actually very awkward and cringy to watch. Also, it would've been better if Lucky Blue Smith had his hair dyed in a more normal, natural color that would fit the theme of the film. Now every time he appeared on screen with the glazing look and barely moving eyebrows I saw only him, not Bridger. That, and the fact that not one character was properly being "deepened into". This, and the viewer just isn't able to emotionally connect with the characters and the film. It'll feel plain and empty. For example, the film starts with a scene where an older man isn't exactly nice, somehow the mom arrives at the right moment, and they decide to leave. It would've been better if they had played it out first (with a couple more "bad" moments), because now there is no way for the viewer to feel for the characters. We don't yet feel upset or remorse for Bridger and his mom because we've only been watching for what, 3 minutes? Do have to give props to the woman who played Clover. She did do the crying well, though, pulling crying expressions and letting out small pained cries. That was actually believable. Sadly Lucky Blue on the other hand kept a straight face during most of the film, when sometimes one would expect him to respond to the mom or Clover in an suited emotional way. To have him stare at someone else without doing anything might be extremely hot as a model, but not very smart if you want to make it as an actor as well.

lisapaul I enjoyed this movie. There was plenty of humor. There were very touching moments that had the tears streaming down my face. I felt that Lucky did a great job. It is a lot harder to convey emotion without words, and he was awesome at this. He is very engaging to watch. Landon did an excellent job as the teacher. He was very believable and I enjoyed his character. Emily did a great job and I enjoy her as an actress. Shawn did a wonderful job with his character. Christie was very believable and I enjoyed her chemistry with Lucky. The other supporting actors were believable and fun to watch. I was drawn into this story. My only criticism is, I would've enjoyed more of a backstory on Lucky's character's condition. I thought the scenery and music were wonderful. This is an enjoyable movie to watch.