Comwayon A Disappointing Continuation

Ginger Very good movie overall, highly recommended. Most of the negative reviews don't have any merit and are all pollitically based. Give this movie a chance at least, and it might give you a different perspective.

Skyler Great movie. Not sure what people expected but I found it highly entertaining.

Billy Ollie Through painfully honest and emotional moments, the movie becomes irresistibly relatable

museumofdave If someone wants to understand what happened between the end of the silent period and the beginning of sound, to experience an immersion in the sort of lyrical romance that people responded to at the time, there are few better films than Lucky Star. Both of the featured players, Janet Gaynor and Charles Farrell had already established themselves as audience favorites in films from Seventh Heaven on, and this simple tale of a crippled soldier finding love with a rustic local girl allowed both of them to give rich, likable performances without gross exaggeration or hysteria. For contemporary moviegoers, accustomed to multiple layers of irony and a cynical take on romance between a man and a woman, this film may be laughable, but for those willing to transport themselves to another world (which is what film can do so well!) director Frank Borzage's magical, shadowy, soft-focus rustic never-never land creates a sweet, idyllic romance

Michael_Elliott Lucky Star (1929)*** (out of 4)Entertaining silent drama has Timothy (Charles Farrell) and poor farm girl Mary (Janet Gaynor) meeting under bad circumstances before the start of WWI. After the war Timothy returns home as a cripple and soon he and Mary strike up a strong friendship, which doesn't sit too well with people in town or Mary's mother due to their prejudice against him being cripple. LUCKY STAR should have been a complete disaster but director Frank Borzage and the two stars do a remarkable job at building up the drama and there's no question that the message really packs a punch. The film is incredibly dark and this is especially true when it comes to the message of how people were pretty much throwing cripples into a lonely shack and forgetting about them. The message of this not being right is certainly well told here and especially because there's no melodrama preaching but instead it's perfectly built into the story. I was really surprised to see how dark this part of the story was told and it's pretty darn grim. Some of the best moments in the film deal with the blossoming relationship between the two stars. They made several films together and it's easy to see why because their chemistry just jumps right off the screen. The romance here is quite good and manages to keep a smile on your face throughout. Gaynor, as you'd expect, has no trouble playing the charming farm girl and Farrell is just as great and especially during his more dramatic scenes dealing with not being able to walk. Guinn 'Big Boy' Williams is excellent as the rival for Gaynor's attention and Hedwiga Reicher makes for a great villain as her mother. The ending is incredibly far-fetched but it's so perfectly executed that you can't help but get caught up in the drama.

MartinHafer I noticed that one reviewer referred to this as a 'perfect film'. Well, there are some serious problems with the plot towards the very end that, to me, make it less than perfect. But, aside from this, the film abounds with charm and is among the better silents I have seen--and I've seen a lot.A couple notes before I go on with the review. First, while this film originally was a part-talking picture with sound effects, the sound has been lost. However, I don't think this was a bad thing, as many such hybrid films aren't that great due to poor sound and integration of this. And, frankly, had you just assumed it was always a silent, you'd never notice the difference thanks to the excellent restoration. Second, if you get the film from Netflix, you'll find that their summary of the film's plot is very wrong.The film begins in a small town just before the US gets directly involved in WWI. Charles Farrell is a nice guy who decides to enlist. But, before he does this, he has a run-in with a tom-boyish girl (Janet Gaynor). There is no hint of love on either of their parts and Gaynor appears to be way too young anyway.In the war, Farrell is badly injured and his legs are paralyzed. He returns home after two years and is relatively upbeat considering everything--but he's also quite lonely. Gaynor begins to visit him and he assumes she's just a girl. But, slowly they both help each other--he gets the needed companionship and he cleans her up and reveals her to be a pretty young lady--a lady of almost 18. At this point, it's obvious both are starting to fall in love, but he's afraid to allow his feelings to show, as he sees himself as a cripple.Later, a horrible person (Guinn Williams) returns to town from the war--the same guy who may have contributed to Farrell's injury and the same guy who has no compunction about getting a girl to sleep with him by promising to marry them! When Williams starts to show the now prettified Gaynor attentions, Farrell cannot sit back in his wheelchair and acts. Now this action on Farrell's part was fun to watch but 100% ridiculous--no man can make a recovery THAT fast! His hopping out of his wheelchair and going on crutches for the first time--and in the snow--is ridiculous. Yes, it made for a fun finale...but one that makes no logical sense. It's a shame, actually, as up until then it WAS the perfect film. Still, the ending does not ruin the film and is well worth seeing even with its flaws.

evanston_dad This was my first exposure to Janet Gaynor, and I fell in love with her. She plays a poor, ragamuffin country girl who begins a timid romance with a wheelchair-bound WWI veteran (Charles Farrell), against the stern wishes of her mother, who wants her to marry instead a swaggering bully. Director Frank Borzage keeps the potential mawkish sentimentality at bay, and pulls achingly beautiful and naturalistic performances from his actors. When you watch Gaynor's face in this film, able to convey heaps of emotion (just get a look at her when she first realizes Farrell is confined to a wheelchair) with the most nuanced of glances, it's no surprise that she was able to make a successful transition to sound film and continue as a huge star and box-office draw throughout the 1930s.The forbidden love storyline is the stuff of standard silent film melodrama, as is the suspenseful race-against-time finale that finds Charles Farrell willing himself to walk so that he can get to Gaynor before her husband-to-be takes her away forever. All of that is as silly as it sounds. But it's the quieter moments that give this film its gentle appeal: like the surprisingly erotic scene in which Farrell decides Gaynor needs a makeover and washes her hair with the yolks of a dozen eggs; or the beautiful bittersweet moment when Farrell gives Gaynor a gold bracelet that looks like an over-sized wedding ring.A film center in Chicago is showing a festival of Gaynor and/or Borzage films, and I look forward to seeing more of both of them.Grade: A