Mr. Jones

2013 "If You See Him... Run"
4.6| 1h30m| PG-13| en
Details

Scott (Jon Foster) is a filmmaker in need of inspiration. He and his girlfriend Penny (Sarah Jones) move into a desolate house hoping to make a breakthrough. Then they discover their neighbor, the elusive Mr. Jones. Famous for his haunting sculptures, Mr. Jones has remained a mystery to the world. Scott and Penny, convinced that they have found the perfect film subject, sneak into his workshop and realize that their curiosity may have chilling consequences. Who is Mr. Jones?

AD
AD

Watch Free for 30 Days

Stream on any device, 7-day free trial Watch Now

Trailers & Clips

Reviews

Supelice Dreadfully Boring
SeeQuant Blending excellent reporting and strong storytelling, this is a disturbing film truly stranger than fiction
Kinley This movie feels like it was made purely to piss off people who want good shows
Edwin The storyline feels a little thin and moth-eaten in parts but this sequel is plenty of fun.
shanellelacrista The camera work was bad even for found footage and the story was all over the place. This was just bad.
Addie Joy I believe the reason a lot of people dislike this movie is because it really isn't a conventional horror. It's nothing like Slenderman or the Blair Witch Project. But it's got themes that I find very enjoyable. It's disturbing more than it is scary, and it's so aesthetically pleasing that I found myself wanting to move into the woods too - at first. The fact that the main characters were nature photographers really sets up the movie to have some wonderful scenery. Penny and Scott were a beautiful couple, and I loved the portions of the movie where they were peaceful and happy together. You expect the movie to start out happy and then fly off the deep end, like most horror movies do, but this one doesn't do that. Rather, it's set on a gradual increase, from peaceful to stressed to scary to insane. That might bother some people, but I found it very pleasing, simply because it wasn't quite like most horror movies. I absolutely love the way the conflict was carried out. For the first half of the movie, you genuinely expect Mr. Jones to be the main antagonist. But as time goes on, and you see the way he interacts with the main characters, it doesn't feel that way anymore. In fact, at some point, we find that the real antagonist is more of a concept than a physical being. The way that was developed was completely unexpected for the viewer. Again, that might bother people - they want a real antagonist, like an alien or a ghost or Mr. Jones himself. But in this movie, the closest thing we have to a physical antagonist is actually the protagonists. It's a complex idea, and I find it to be beautiful. I usually don't like found-footage films. They seem to always have the same concept. However, this one really resonated well with me. The aesthetics are beautiful, the concept is complex, the characters are well-executed, and the scary aspect is psychologically disturbing. If I had to name what kind of movie this even is, I'd call it an Aesthetic Thriller.
TheRedDeath30 A young man convinces his wife to give up everything so that they can move to a shack in the middle of nowhere that will enable him to film the best nature documentary ever. They discover that their neighbor may be an enigmatic artist named Mr. Jones who creates creepy scarecrows. As they dive deeper into the mystery than they should, they discover that Mr. Jones may be creating totems to protect them from the dream world and they may have just ruined that protection and unleashed nightmare forces upon them.What a great concept, right? I was drawn into what could have been a great movie, but ultimately doesn't have the creative forces behind it to bring that idea to any sort of reasonable fruition. It does start off pretty good. The acting from the only two real characters in the movie is pretty good for a low budget horror film, though we are not really given any background or development that truly makes us learn anything about these people so that we'll care about them down the road. They are just an anonymous couple who seem to have given up life to be artists. They discover Mr. Jones cabin fairly early on in the film and there's some promise there as the scarecrows are pretty effectively made and lend some atmosphere to things, though let's not pretend these are original in any way. They're essentially more twisted versions of the policeman scarecrow in CHILDREN OF THE CORN.The first big problem in the movie is the found footage style. I'm not a hate of found footage, like so many others seem to be and I do not think it makes a movie garbage right off the bat, but you have to be using it for a reason, and you have to be consistent with it to give it the right feel. There's no reason for this to exist as found footage. Nothing is gained by the pretense of this being filmed by the characters, rather than just admitting it's a movie. Worse, it's really inconsistently shot. There are voice-overs, text overlays to introduce characters in interviews and shots that just plain could not have been created by the characters' filming at all. It breaks up the illusion of "found footage" even more and destroys it pretty much. They would have been much better off just telling this as a straightforward narrative.The biggest problems with the movie come once things start getting strange. Basically, things are just getting strange for the sake of being strange featuring a lot of random imagery and sounds, quick cuts from shot to shot and scene to scene and nonsense storytelling. It quickly becomes very hard to tell what's going on, or for that matter to even see what's going on in a lot of shots. It's all done under the pretense of being "dreamlike", but the reality is that it's a convenient excuse to not have to actually tell much of a story, to not have to create an actual narrative that makes sense, to not have to back up your plot with any events that would support what happens. You can just fill your fun time with anything you want to and say "it's a dream". A 4-year old's scribbling may be images in their mind, but few of us know what the picture is supposed to be and that's basically what this movie is.It all leads to a climax that I'm sure the director thinks is very clever and people who want to feel artsy will tell you has some grand meaning to be discussed in length. It means nothing because nothing that happened in the movie proceeding it has any real value. Random images leading to a random conclusion. That is all.
Helena Rix Warming This movie is really thought through and the details are to perfection! - but you have to get it just right, and I think I did. Its all filmed by handhold camera and they did a great job! In the beginning we meet Scott and Penny, a happy young couple there just sold their apartment and moved away from family and friends, because Scott wanted to make a documentary about nature. They gambled it all and moved into a forest far away from civilization. Scotts interest is lost fast and this create troubles in their relationship.One day they run into Mr. Jones, a gateway keeper who keeps nightmares out of our world. He do this with these creepy "totems", he places around the woods, they make some sort of force. They will now make a movie about Mr. Jones and his art, because he is known as a mysterious artist and such a movie could bring in a load of money! .... Scott and Penny disturbs Mr. Jones force and now they will fight the consequences.You have to listen carefully when you see the interviews Scott do. This movie is a masterpiece and the "totems" are beautiful!