GamerTab That was an excellent one.

Titreenp SERIOUSLY. This is what the crap Hollywood still puts out?

Nayan Gough A great movie, one of the best of this year. There was a bit of confusion at one point in the plot, but nothing serious.

Marva-nova Amazing worth wacthing. So good. Biased but well made with many good points.

Turfseer "My Mother's Castle," also known in French as "Le Château de ma mère, is the sequel to a two-part series of films based on famed playwright, novelist and filmmaker Marcel Pagnol's childhood memoirs set in turn of the century France. "My Mother's Castle," is a continuation of the story of Marcel, Pagnol's protagonist, a young boy who grows up under the tutelage of his father, Joseph, a public school teacher in Marseilles. Unlike the first film, "My Father's Glory," the sequel focuses more on Marcel, instead of the uninspiring conflict between father Joseph and Uncle Jules, one a confirmed atheist and the other, a devoted Catholic. Of the two films, I found "My Mother's Castle" superior to "My Father's Glory," not only because it moves at a brisker pace, but there are more interesting things happening to Marcel and his family (instead of the long-winded tale involving hunting).We find out first that the family's trip to the country home outside Marseilles takes place mostly on foot. This becomes an important piece of information later on which will be discussed in a moment. Marcel soon becomes smitten with an eccentric young girl, Isabelle, who orders him to dress up in different outfits. Isabelle's parents are as eccentric as she is, and soon the children's relationship ends when Joseph decries that Marcel isn't allowed to see them again. Interestingly enough, the family is forced to give up their expensive digs after the father, a newspaper columnist, insults his boss and is presumably let go.The encounter with Bouzigue, Joseph's former pupil, leads to some even more interesting complications. Bouzigue is a canal worker, who offers a key to Joseph, that opens various doors along the path next to the canal; this allows the family to take a shortcut and save them hours of traveling to the country home. The only problem is that while taking the shortcut, the family ends up trespassing on the private property of various noblemen who own houses along the waterway. At first, Joseph refuses to even consider the idea, but wife Augustine persuades him to take the shortcut, as it enables the family to make the trip to the country house every week.Joseph ends up rationalizing his decision to accept Bouzigue's offer but deep down knows he's going up against his moral code. It's a fascinating quandary Joseph finds himself in, and I'm sure Joseph's decision will remind most of us that we've occasionally been guilty of an ethical lapse or two in our lives. The family's encounter with the first property owner ends up quite benign as the man turns out to be a thoroughly gracious and helpful fellow. A groundskeeper on another estate allows the family to pass through unimpeded. On the family's second trip, things go completely awry as they find the last door padlocked, and a surly caretaker at the last estate threatens to write an official report that could lead to Joseph being fired and losing his pension. Unlike the first film, there's a real dark moment here, and it's nicely resolved in the third act when Bouzique and his co-workers get the caretaker to tear up his report by threatening him with violating the canal company's rules about padlocking their doors. The story also takes us back to Marseilles where Marcel must pass a big exam to obtain a scholarship at the most prestigious school in the country. Marcel's Mom has a little more to do here than in the first film where she plays the part of a stay at home Mom."My Mother's Castle" ends on a sad note. We learn that Augustine dies five years later and leaves Joseph bereft. Marcel's childhood friend from the countryside, Lili, dies in World War I and brother Paul not long afterward, at the young age of 31. Marcel eventually becomes a film director, and while checking out an old house his company has bought for a film studio, he discovers it's the very same house where his family met the unpleasant caretaker and almost ended Joseph's career."My Mother's Castle" is a wistful remembrance of the childhood of author Pagnol. If we think back, I'm sure there are a few extraordinary tales we can recall about our childhood. The narrative is put together in such a way that it reminds us of how impressionable we can be as children and that the events of those times leave a lasting impression that can never be forgotten, even when one reaches the last days of old age.

Andreas Niedermayer The sequel to My Father's Glory. The story itself is not as developed and interesting as in part one, as it mainly deals with the short cut the Pagnols use to reach their summer domicile. Still, it's the end that makes this sequel a very good movie. The end symbolizes the transitoriness of life and bliss. Nothing stays the same. Time goes by. We grow older. The magic of childhood diminishes. We lose loved ones. Our hearts break in two. Kids don't know such things. Life, as it proceeds, changes everything. And then, sometimes, we stop and look back, just as Marcel did at the very end, when he walked the path of his childhood, accompanied by tender shadows of the past. We look behind our shoulder and... what do we see? We see shadows of our own past, maybe we hear the laughter of young voices, so full of joy and energy, and maybe we wonder what has happened to the kid who used to laugh that way? Why don't we laugh that way today? Because this is one part of our life that's inevitably gone. That's what's so superbly symbolized by the last few shots. When I first saw this, I felt tears in my eyes. This is an eternal story of how fading life is, and therewith this movie has achieved its place in my heart.

LeRoyMarko I first saw Le Château de ma mère and La Gloire de mon père shortly after their release in 1990. At first, I gave a higher ranking to Le Château. I just saw the two movies again, and now it's La Gloire who's coming on first.But it is not to say that Le Château is not a good movie. It's an EXCELLENT movie. The saga of Marcel continues. Young Marcel Pagnol that is. The cast is again great: Philippe Caubère and Nathalie Roussel shine, Juline Ciamaca does a great job as Marcel.And, once again, we get a taste of life in France's countryside, its colors, its ways of doing things. Great!Too bad, there was not a third movie to follow La Gloire and Le Château.See this one!Out of 100, I gave it 86. That's good for ***½ out of ****. I gave La Gloire de mon père the same star rating, but 87 out of 100.Seen again at home, in Toronto, on August 11th, 2002.

dramis A poetic as well as realistic look at the life of a family in la Provence at the beginning of the century. Charming, delicate and so far from the usual American movies.